I also was aware of the hypocrisy of how «gay» sin, or «non-virgin» sin, or other «moral» issues, were regarded far far differently
than sins of omission, white lies, tax fudging, white collar crime in general (who is more sinful, the girl that has sex before marriage, or the CEO that knows his company is lax on pollution standards that affect the health of hundreds / thousands of people and animals that live nearby)
In reality, how much pointing out of sin is being done in our churches other
than the sin of homosexuality?
The sins of... pride and self satisfaction, are more deadly...
than the sins of the flesh ever were, or can be.»
What goes unsaid, and what Brutus and Cassius discover soon enough, is that a sin of commission is deadlier
than a sin of omission.
Not exact matches
And, for what it's worth, its name often autocompletes on Google ahead
of «the 7 deadly
sins» and «the 7 dwarfs» — which prompted one Twitter user to observe, «You're more popular
than the Bible and Disney.»
Likewise, a 132 - page Task Force report was released which found CEO Jamie Dimon guilty
of no greater
sin than being too reliant on information from below.
For Congress, it's a chance for politicians to bare their teeth and hold somebody accountable for the
sins of the internet — diminished privacy, fake news and the polarization
of ideas, issues that Facebook deals with more often
than most.
Both companies generate more
than half their revenue from the Chinese special administrative region
of Macau — and not
Sin City.
(For instance I'm fairly confident that promiscuity is sinful, especially when it comes from a place
of lust, but I'm less convinced that my committed same - sex friends are
sinning by expressing their love physically any more
than I am
sinning when my wife and I express our love physically — even though I think we can be if we are acting out
of lust or as a means
of asserting power over one another, but that is another story).
5:29,30; «If your right eye causes you to
sin, pluck it out and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one
of your members perish,
than for your whole body to be cast into hell.»
Why are you listening to black clerics over this issue, Blacks are having more kids out
of wed lock
than whites, they are also like white, living in
sin, but the church's say nothing about having babies without a husband or sitting in church and living in
sin, talk about glass houses, and besides the marriages are Cival marriage not religious marriage, what a bunch
of hipocrites..
By commenting on sexuality as an aspect
of our lives in which we can live for God, this seems to imply more
than simply refraining from sexual
sin.
As a matter
of fact, those are mentioned more
than other
sins.
The songs on this two - cd set are arranged thematically rather
than chronologically and reflect many
of the recurring themes
of Cash's oeuvre: love,
sin, redemption, life, death... Adding to the intimacy level, many
of the songs feature spoken introductions by Cash, as if he were introducing the songs to an audience, in which he talks about his history with the song, how he learned it, or wrote it and, more personally, why he feels such a deep connection with the composition.
Chesterton once said that God «has the eternal appetite
of infancy; for we have
sinned and grown old, and our Father is younger
than we.»
Today we have science dictating our Lives when it is the tool
of the devil and leads to more
Sin,
than ancient torture methods ever did.
Several others point to Berry's lack
of attention to the good
of politics, especially what co-editor Nathan Schlueter calls «formal mediating institutions,» and Schlueter himself comes closer
than anyone to an outright rebuke
of Berry for his disregard
of «the original
sin narrative, with all that it implies» in his pacifism.»
Animals, as you know, do not
sin, so for you, being godless is your choice to become animal like rather
than a child
of God.
What could be more comforting to modern consciousness
than to discover that «ultimate concern» and «
sin» are essential and unavoidable characteristics
of the human condition?
Rather
than viewing it as a sign
of sin or mistrust, let's view it as a temporary messenger, designed to slow us down and reorient our minds, bodies and souls towards the peace and the freedom that Christ promised.
a vermin shirt remits venial
sins Whipping yourself with a switch erases having dirty thoughts Putting gravel in your socks for four days makes God happy Going to church and donating on Holy Days
of Obligation is better
than other days?
According to Schiller, Lycurgus» chief
sin was to deny that «the state is never an end in itself (Der Staat selbst ist niemals Zweck); it is important only as a condition under which the purpose
of mankind can be attained, and this purpose is none other
than the development
of all man's powers, his progress and improvement.»
7) This god is the Judeo - Christian god 8) It made the entire Universe less
than 10,000 years ago, complete with Adam and Eve and later there was a Worldwide flood and Noah and his ark is actual factual history 9) about 2,000 years ago, it impregnated a Greco - Roman Jewish virgin with itself gave birth to a human being and then had it sacrificed to itself to forgive the original
sin of Adam and Eve.
Also, if you believe that God created them, you must also concede that he warned Adam & Eve not to make certain choices, but gave them freedom to do so, and that the consequences they were warned
of have come to fruition for both them and all their progeny, and that
sin hurts more
than just the sinner, and so our lives (all
of us) become increasingly more complex and painful with each new
sin introduced, such that the choice to do right is often painful for us, which is not as it should be, nor as God would have it, but as we have made it.
That is largely the result
of a soteriology that begins with Original
Sin rather
than Original Blessing [mankind created in the image
of God with the potential for aquiring «godlikeness» over time through cooperation with Grace].
But more
than 1.5 billion Orthodox and Catholics, 75 percent
of Christendom, believe that Christ Himself gave the apostles, their successors and priests the ability to forgive
sin on His behalf and His Church.
A systematic theology that begins with Original
Sin rather
than Original Blessing can not be reconciled with the witness
of Jesus to God as recorded in the Gospels.
Reflect on this a little: Many
of the inspirations
of the threefold system
of political economy derive from evangelical inspirations such as personal creativity, personal responsibility, freedom, the love for community through association and mutual cooperation, the aim
of bettering the condition
of every person on earth, the cultivation
of the rule
of law, respect for the natural rights
of others, the preference for persuasion by reason rather
than by coercion, and a powerful sense
of sin.
And isn't making ourselves the definers
of sin a little too close to saying we're better
than God?
I do know that if I followed the guidelines
of one liturgical commission, suggesting that I greet each penitent at the church doors with an open Gospel book and then lead a procession to a reconciliation room which looks more like an occasion
of sin than a shrine for its absolution, the number
of confessions in the middle
of the metropolis where I serve would be severely reduced.
To be honest, it's more
than a little scary when the people who are supposed to be spiritual role models for the next generation are seemingly lost in a sea
of self - righteous, politicized
sin that seems to be so far removed from what Jesus represented.
Rather
than be infected by
sin,
sin is infected by the holiness
of Jesus.
It may be that He has the eternal appetite
of infancy; for we have
sinned and grown old, and our Father is younger
than we.»
Example number three: More
than a few who deny the water baptism is for the forgiveness
of sins say that Acts 2:38 has been mistranslated.
I think the «
sin» is not in being different
than the norm, but in trying to force something that isn't right for you — sacrificing, not in a noble way but a harmful way, who you are, remaining in a relationship or trying to be something you simply can not be, because that's what's expected regardless
of the consequences to your wellbeing.
And as Cheever's confession to Hersey makes clear, the real stress lies more on the human choice between darkness and light
than on the sovereignty
of God's grace — the divine goodness which must redeem not only our grosser
sins but our noblest aspirations as well.
Jeremy it just hit me like a bolt
of lightning i am so excited about this thought that salvation has nothing to do with eternal life but is speaking
of losing the ability to be an overcomer in Christ.Having been there as a carnal christian i always believed in Jesus but i felt i did nt have the power to live a christian life so i felt like a hippocrite i was still subject to
sin and sinful desires.So in that sense i had never received salvation because i had never been an overcomer in the first place.So i can see how a christian could lose there salvation having once walked by faith but that does nt effect there eternal life in Christ.Just so others know i am now walking by faith and am an overcomer i know what it is like to experience the power
of the holy spirit and to not be overcome by my old nature that is what Jesus wants us all to experience rather
than being a victim
of the enemy.Whether we are an overcomer or not does nt effect our eternal life.brentnz
The 1975 Continental Congress on the Family (a nationwide gathering in St. Louis
of more
than 2,000 evangelicals) issued a statement declaring that «while we acknowledge the Bible teaches homosexuality to be sinful, we recognize that a homosexual orientation can be the result
of having been
sinned against.»
Personally, I can not imagine a worse judgement for
sin than to have my children brutally murdered, and the greatest gift
of this life (being a parent) taken away from me.
Christians whose anthropology is defined by Original
Sin rather
than Original Blessing will always have a pessimistic view
of people and life in general.
Here, the salvation is
of the spiritual kind, rather
than the salvation from physical enemies, because
of the mention
of sins in Luke 1:77.
The most innovative gesture in Jones's feminist remap - ping
of sin is her linking
sin to the eschatologically oriented doctrines
of sanctification and justification rather
than to creation, as many
of her feminist predecessors have done.
The concept
of once saved always saved takes a bit to get your head around but Gods grace is greater
than our
sin and greater
than our good works it just takes faith in Jesus Christ to recieve Gods grace.In saying that to continue to
sin as a christian is like playing with fire you will be burnt.Paul talks
of the sexual immorality in corinthian church
of the son and father that were sleeping with the same wife they were excommunicated from the church the members were not allowed to even eat with them until they repented.There are consequences for our actions.The other side to this is that if you continue to
sin as a christian you are not walking by faith but walking by the flesh and are really backsliding.In the backslidden state you also become powerless and open to attack by satan as long as we walk in the flesh he can influence us to get worse not better.If we are walking in Christ satan may still try to tempt us but we are empowered by the holy spirit and overcome him and our faith increases.Both are saved by grace but one is powerless because
of sin versus saved but an overcomer having been set free from
sin i think this is what Paul was trying to explain.It is better to be an overcomer
than overcome by
sin.brentnz
The most painful part
of the process, though, was when friends and well - meaning mentors dismissed my questions as silly, or, even worse, questioned whether my doubt was nothing more
than an attempt to justify some sort
of secret
sin in my life, usually pride.
Imagine being specific, both about our corporate
sins and about the love that is «broader
than the measures
of the mind.»
The media hounded Tim Farron for his Christian views; they did not regard it as acceptable for him to hold views other
than those
of the political elite, or the majority, Similarly, our belief in the personhood
of the unborn child and the sanctity
of their lives enables us to see abortion as a
sin crying to heaven for justice, not merely some privately held opinion; for us it is most definitely not «a woman's choice».
If you hear someone talking about
sin they are more likely talking about big problems like environmental degradation, economic justice, and war,
than about issues
of personal morality like adultery or gluttony.
Rather
than releasing a woman from her bondage to
sin, Luther's courtroom drama recapitulates the very dynamics
of her oppression — the «shattering she knows all too well.»
And yet, as Jones points out, no aspect
of Christian theology has a deeper resonance with feminist analyses
of oppression
than the doctrine
of sin.
'' If any one asserts, that this
sin of Adam, which in its origin is one, and being transfused into all by propagation, not by imitation, is in each one as his own, is taken away either by the powers
of human nature, or by any other remedy
than the merit
of the one mediator, our Lord Jesus Christ... let him be anathema.»