Sentences with phrase «than a striker from»

Embed from Getty Images However, it seems Theo Walcott has his eyes set on that challenge, after revealing he wants to be known as a right - winger rather than a striker from now on.

Not exact matches

We still miss obvious chances and i would feel much better if i depend on strikers to win muches than golazos from defenders snd midfielders..........

I could have understood if we had unearthed someone from Argentina / Chile / Brazil (historically have had some great strikers) but someone from Asia — its a PR gem — nothing other than that.

If only we can cry over the spilled milk, I would have take Higuain from Madrid over Ozil... The season before we bought Ozil our best player was Cazorla (AMF) and we were in a desperate need for a striker (still we are) and Higuain was availabe for less than 30M... Ozil is good (more than good but not for Arsenal) but I think it was a panic buy in the last minutes to pleased the frustrated fans due to lack of actions in that window...

To be honest Arsene, there wasn't really much football to talk about, but the fact is that every Arsenal fan knows that without a new striker we have little chance of the title this season, but according to him, the protests from the travelling fans are simply because they are being led by the media rather than making their own mind up.

Giroud scored two goals but was useless the whole game.Loan out or sell Giroud, Gibbs, Elneny, Wilshire, metersacker.Buy a tall, pacy and skillful stiker pay 85 million for striker alone Mbappe get isco or lacazette for 50 million add kolosanic that's less than 200million available for rebuild plus some more cash from Deadwoods.Get Allegri, leow or simione but, that's me not kroenke

he always misses chances from 6 yards.with giroud as our striker forget about winning anything.even akpom is better than that hair gel striker.

Sell him to Munich in the summer and buy the striker we need, on a positive note, well done Danny welbeck, have to admit I don't rate him but he was great last night really impressed me, maybe he can develop to b much better than I thought, hope so, also Montreal deserves real credit for his huge improvement from last season.

He scores more goals than your beloved striker Giroud, but scoring from the wing.

Wonder what you lots would be saying if we have bought fabregas and chelsea got ozil with costa in front.and to all «if chelsea win the bpl, its cos of fabregas» announcers here, i say if chelsea win the league its cos of their whole team and most importantly costa.the thing that prevented them from winning it last season was lack of a proper striker like costa which jose testified to and not because they did nt create enough scoring chances (they created more scoring chances than us last season).

For one thing he suffered more than once from not having a top top quality striker in front of him and teammates that let's be frank are wasteful in front of goals (Walcott, Welbeck among others).

I can give you the names of 6 unheralded strikers (4 South Americans and 2 Africans) we could have got for less than 15 mil and who would have given us another dimension All of them can give you quality through the middle and from the wings.

Isn't it ironic that when a striker moves from being a big player at a small club, they more often than not become a small player at a big club?

Aside from his fantastic play during Euro 2008, Pavlyuchenko has looked more like a one - trick pony, than a lethal striker that can play on any level.

SEE ALSO: Capital One Cup: Man City, Liverpool, Chelsea all face EPL opposition, Manchester United & Arsenal get favourable draws (Video) Tottenham 1 - 2 Arsenal: Match report & highlights from White Hart Lane as Mathieu Flamini buries Spurs 20 Excellent Strikers In Football Manager 2015 Available For Less Than # 20m

He scores more goals from the wing more than your darling striker (Giroud).

A lack of supply from his teammates could be highlighted by Lacazette's fewer shots, although he has been more clinical than Morata, converting 30 per cent of his chances compared to 21 per cent from the Chelsea striker.

All last month i stayed away from this site becouse i know this site is full of akb licker who love more arsen than the club.i new cos we won few pre season micky mouse trophy they will think we will win the world cup.youve been crying out for world class striker n dm midfielder since hendry left.but does he fix the problen no.but them akb lickers will still defend him cos they do nt care about the club they only care abt there loards wenger job.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

Its NOT just Giroud its the whole strike force that are absolutly rubbish, I mean yes Giroud misses far more than he scores and that is NOT the mark of top notch striker, but Wellbeck is not the finished article and to my mind shows no signs of becoming so, He seems to suffer from this innate lack of courage, a lot like Wallcott does, in laymans terms they sh!t out when it comes to the crunch, Giroud is just not good enough to be the striker we really need on the end of Ozil's assists.

Ever since the German midfield star became the record Arsenal transfer when signing from Real Madrid a couple of years ago, people have suggested that he needs a striker with better pace and movement than Olivier Giroud to really get the best out of him.

We've got to have full backs and wingers than can actually take they're man on and provide for a striker that can always be available to benefit from this forward momentum and that can anchor the striker to afford to stay high and in the box.

That is still 27 goals scored from open play and a better return than any off our strikers since RVP left.

Arsenal's chief made a very calculated move in targeting Henry, as he already knew his style from Monaco and had no doubts that he'd do a better job as a striker rather than a wing that he was at Juventus.

giroud, lecoq, are gud backups to hve in the squad but not a first team player for a team wanting to challenge for epl.coq has got to improve slightly on the ball but off the ball he is gud.everyone knows about giroud and I don't think a gud striker is enough for us.we need a very clinical guy not a guy who will be going through dry patches coz thats guaranteed from a gud striker.gibbs is tricky he is a gud option to hve on the bench but if we scout someone younger and better than him then I think we can sell him for both the clubs sake and himself coz he hasn't progressed as a player.what I find shocking is bellerin back up is jenkinson worth a team challenging for epl?I don't think so and we should find an able guy there than fool ourselves and next season we pay for mistakes again.

I still think Welbeck is a better player than Giroud (LOL what a shame Manchester United 4th choice striker is better than our number 1) but I think Wenger bought the wrong striker from United.

After reading some stats, in 2010, Crouch was the 3rd highest striker out of the top 100 strikers in the BPL to score more goals from headers than foot.

So Arsenal fans will be less than chuffed to hear the words of the Watford striker Troy Deeney who scored and helped the Hornets to that shock victory over us at the Emirates stadium a week ago, because he accuses Aaron Ramsey of shirking away from a tackle which could have stopped their opening goal and made it a much different game.

Don't get me wrong — I said from the beginning that Benzema wouldn't be sold unless Real Madrid were replacing him, like they and Barcelona did with Özil and Sanchez — but the fact that we have an obvious need for a striker and a cover DM, Wenger / those in charge seem to be content with the current squad makes me sympathize with Robin Van Persie for leaving when he had bigger ambitions than what those in charge had.

Wanting another striker might have more to do with Welbeck than it does Giroud but up until this latest spell from Giroud prolific isnt a word i would describe to him, hard working clever and a good standard of finishing is how i seen him before coming back.

the stand out free agent is 30 * jonas free agent 80 - 82rating prev valencia main striker worth 11m champ League 14app = 8g, 5 ass la liga113app = 36g / 16ass excellent = ball control, very good = dribble, preditor, long shots good = finishing, positioning, vision decent = free kick, speed, passing last season comparison; # ave 0.87 shots outside area better than giroud # 39 % take ons better than giroud not far from welbeck # 56 % shot accuracy would rival the best finishers in the prem.

I'm with you there mate.He's just an average player beign given many chances.A lot of average strikers can even do better because of the chances Arsenal creates.There are some strikers who are not top quality but have very good finishing that if given the same seasons and chances Giroud has had they can do better.I hate it when they make it seem like only world class strikers are better than him.He's really only improved from season 14/15 honestly speaking.He used to be so bad and waste a lot of chances.It's just that become can not see the fact that he's not as good as they think.We will surely be vindicated by his performance for another club.

I thought people here were debating about two or three seasons back why he should be our top striker.When I thought the Monaco match was the icing on the cake to show how average he was it seems just like Wenger we» will never learn our lesson.Now people our okay with him being a super sub which is debatable.Giroud was a super sub in games last season because he wasn't played when he was supposed to.He's not your ideal super sub because he very hardly creates but rather requires people to create for him.Most of the time super subs are the one's who tend to create the chances and open up spaces in the opposition defence.West ham are ready to pay and hence we should demand more from them.We can then use the money from his sale on far better players.Given the same seasons, time and chances a lot of average strikers can do better than what he did.This is because Arsenal create a lot of chances and it just needs someone who can finish.Goodbye!.

campbell or sanogo should go on loan now and replaced with 30 * brazilian jonas free agent 80 - 82rating prev valencia main striker worth 11m champ League 14app = 8g, 5 ass la liga113app = 36g / 16ass excellent = ball control, very good = dribble, preditor, long shots good = finishing, positioning, vision decent = free kick, speed, passing last season comparison; # ave 0.87 shots outside area better than giroud # 39 % take ons better than giroud not far from welbeck # 56 % shot accuracy would rival the best finishers in the prem.

not sure, but if you that's true then it's because we have no other striker than him... soft touches, double passes, hold up play are not great at all for striker... scoring goals from half chances, passing defenders, put fears into them, these are great not yours...

We may not have a world class striker, but as a unit I think our attack is as good as any other in the league, because we get goals from all over rather than just a main striker like Aguero or Costa.

Any fears that his powers as a striker are on the wane at 34 - years old should be eased by the fact that his last season in France has been his most prolific ever, with 46 goals from 49 games, including 36 in the league at a rate of more than one per match.

Aguero has notorious injury problems and was merely a talented striker before his move from Atletico, both missed more than a month through injury and both scored 20 + goals.

Arsenal can not pay money to sign quality striker because no top striker will cost less than 50 million and there is talk of 130 m bid for Mbappe from Real, Barca and PSG LOL.

Is Wenger and his flock honestly saying that that there is no other striker on planet Earth better than Giroud, apart from world class?

Finding a more mobile and more anticipating defensive midfielder would be more important than getting a tall striker, because Arsenal are often easily hit from quick counter-attacks.

There are better strikers than Harry Kane out there (although not many) and he isn't a player who's willing to keep the bench warm while someone else reaps the rewards from the fans and the manager.

Sanchez is the better striker with a more all round game, scored with his head, scored from outside the box, scored tap - ins and made his own goals and that is only after less than half a season of playing the central striker position.

He is a very hard worker, but if you are going to win titles or big trophies then you need more than that from your striker / winger.

can't we get strikers who are better than these big names from less popular leagues.

Nice to say our wise and great leader writer but whether it translates on the pitch is another matter altogether.The problems in arsenal honestly is more than 2 signings however those two signings are coming to the position where we need them the most so we will take it so.But is he really going to do that as from his actions it implies we do not need a new dmf but for a striker i think it crosses his mind at times.He just needs to do the right its like he has lost control or something.I just do not get him again.Imagine dropping Ox who is currently our most effective and best player right now as he is in form.Then he puts Gabriel on the bench for who.He is kidding.He then keeps players who should be released or sold and plays them.This is nonsense.

1 in 2 is ok, but its not like it was years ago.footballs more attacking these days, we need a striker who can do better than that like Aguero or Costa.You say that many elite european teams have sucess without a prolific striker, but you failed to name them.lol.There are exceptions but on the whole most of the top teams have a WC striker a go to man from Barca (european champiions) to real madrid to PSG and even Bayern Munich all have WC centre forwrards up front.To try an argue otherwise is facile

I'm with you Jonm Signing top striker from Dutch League had been more miss than hit 27 goals is really impressive number but if you look at the 2nd top scorer in the list is Luuk DeJong, it put thing into perspective.

Dybala is very versatile, able to play on the flanks, as centre forward or behind the main striker and he is very promising but with less than 100 Serie A games behind him he is far from being the finished article.

To win the PL we at least need to win 25 matches to be within a shout of wining it that requires a minimum of 75 goals without conceding so we need attack minded players and defensive minded players from looking at our attaching force gerouid around 20 alexis 20 thats 40 we need another 35 and than we have the champion league and cup matches on the top of it all we got to consider form fatigue knocks and injuries can the midfield score another 40 another 40 goals have to come from somewhere so physics tells me so another good striker with 25 so goals is required for the math to make any sense