Sentences with phrase «than a structured interview»

There will always be skeptics about this approach to hiring, people who believe their gut tells them more than any structured interview or test could.

Not exact matches

In the interview, Schrank hastens to acknowledge that American scientists also cheat, but, he adds, «We simply think that the incentive structure and the organizational structure in Northeast Asia are much more conducive to this type of fraud than either the incentive structure or the organizational structure in the United States.»

Without commercial breaks, the mini-doc is less than 20 minutes long; it consists of insightful interviews with the crew about - literally - the structure and setup of a single scene within the film.

After analyzing data from written tests and structured interviews of average - and above average - performing fourth graders, Thompson (1992) concluded that the computer version of Dienes» blocks led to stronger student understanding of number system structure and algorithms than use of wooden blocks did.

In a brief interview the author comments on the book's structure: «There are little bits of connection between the five sections; but it's really going to be a bit like listening to a symphony in five movements or, if you like, an LP, an album, a CD in which the tracks are separate, but the whole thing adds up to more than the sum of its parts.»

The findings and, more importantly, the focus have set off a wave of criticism accusing the university panel of failing to interview key people, neglecting to conduct more than a cursory review of allegations and structuring the inquiry so that the outcome — exoneration — was a foregone conclusion.

Believe it or not, more than 80 % of interviewers are not professional trained to conduct an objective and structured interview.

A «one size fits all» approach rarely works with cover letters or letters of interest so tailoring to fit the company you are contacting is really important.A letter of interest for a secretary position, for example, is more of an introductory letter than a teaching or geologist cover letter which is in response to a job advert.Follow our structure and take the time to proofread your work and you will reap the benefits through the interview for a job!

«Structured interviews are much better and subject to less bias than unstructured interviews,» HireVue founder Mark Newman told Fast Company.

Structured interviews are more effective than unstructured ones.

Well - structured interviews, skill and experience assessments combined with accurate and effective background verifications, are the employer's best defense against costly hiring mistakes — and as we know, some hiring mistakes can be far more costly than others!

Candidates that can not only put words to paper, but can present that information in a well - structured and consistent format are much more likely to get interviews than those who haphazardly put content on to a page.

While it is true that engaging a professional resume writing service to author a well structured and strategically crafted resume can significantly increase interview opportunities, the client should know that there is no magic set of «Key Words» or «Key Phrases» that will make your resume more effective than another.

In general, clinical interviews are more open and less structured than formal evaluation because this part of the evaluation allows for the client to convey information and experiences in their own words.

Analyses from FFCWS suggest that exits from cohabitation or marriage between the year - one and year - three interviews are associated with deteriorating mental health for men, but not for women, whose mental health seems to be less sensitive to family structure changes (except that women who exit from cohabitation do have larger increases in anxiety than other groups).

It is similar to CBT in its time - limited approach, structured interviews and assessment tools, but also differs from CBT in that it focuses on the client's affect, rather than cognitions, and the development of a more supportive social network.

Many of the scales demonstrated weak psychometrics in at least one of the following ways: (a) lack of psychometric data [i.e., reliability and / or validity; e.g., HFQ, MASC, PBS, Social Adjustment Scale - Self - Report (SAS - SR) and all perceived self - esteem and self - concept scales], (b) items that fall on more than one subscale (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version), (c) low alpha coefficients (e.g., below.60) for some subscales, which calls into question the utility of using these subscales in research and clinical work (e.g., HFQ, MMPI - A, CBCL - 1991 version, BASC, PSPCSAYC), (d) high correlations between subscales (e.g., PANAS - C), (e) lack of clarity regarding clinically - relevant cut - off scores, yielding high false positive and false negative rates (e.g., CES - D, CDI) and an inability to distinguish between minor (i.e., subclinical) and major (i.e., clinical) «cases» of a disorder (e.g., depression; CDI, BDI), (f) lack of correspondence between items and DSM criteria (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version, CDI, BDI, CES - D, (g) a factor structure that lacks clarity across studies (e.g., PSPCSAYC, CASI; although the factor structure is often difficult to assess in studies of pediatric populations, given the small sample sizes), (h) low inter-rater reliability for interview and observational methods (e.g., CGAS), (i) low correlations between respondents such as child, parent, teacher [e.g., BASC, PSPCSAYC, CSI, FSSC - R, SCARED, Connors Ratings Scales - Revised (CRS - R)-RSB-, (j) the inclusion of somatic or physical symptom items on mental health subscales (e.g., CBCL), which is a problem when conducting studies of children with pediatric physical conditions because physical symptoms may be a feature of the condition rather than an indicator of a mental health problem, (k) high correlations with measures of social desirability, which is particularly problematic for the self - related rating scales and for child - report scales more generally, and (l) content validity problems (e.g., the RCMAS is a measure of anxiety, but contains items that tap mood, attention, peer interactions, and impulsivity).

Using structured interviews, coping and adjustment measures, self - rating behaviour scales, and anxiety and depression scales, these authors found significant differences in the prevalence of eating disorders, with displaced children exhibiting more eating disorders than non-displaced and refugee children.

In general, clinical interviews are more open and less structured than formal testing because this part of the evaluation allows for the client to convey information and experiences in their own words.

Subsequent research, based on a structured interview method more reliable than the psychoanalytic approach, has confirmed the existence of these representations.10 This mental representation of the attachment relationship is called an «Internal Working Model of Attachment.»

The reliability and validity of this structured interview are well documented in studies of outpatient and inpatient samples, 27 and 5 psychometric studies have shown mean sensitivities of 0.66 to 0.83 and mean specificities of 0.78 to 0.88.22,23 Combined diagnoses were generated via the Silverman - Nelles28 procedure for integrating youth and parent reports, in which all diagnoses generated by both informants are accepted: all diagnoses generated by the child's report are accepted if internalizing (and thus potentially more evident to youths than adults [eg, anxiety or depressive disorders]-RRB-, and all diagnoses generated by the parent's report are accepted if externalizing (eg, oppositional defiant disorder).

The NIMH DISC - IV is a structured interview to asses more than 30 common child - and adolescent psychiatric diagnoses, according to the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders IV (DSM - IV).

Psychiatric assessments relied on the Kiddie SADS - E (Epidemiologic Version), a DSM - III - R - based structured interview.30 Diagnoses were based on independent interviews with the mothers and direct interviews of children, except for those younger than 12 years of age who were not directly interviewed.