April 15, 2015 • The Common Core math standards say students need more
than a textbook understanding of concepts like the Pythagorean theorem.
Not exact matches
The first detailed genetic comparison of purebred domestic dogs promises to rewrite the
textbooks with new information about breed classification and insights that may improve canine health by boosting
understanding of the more
than 350 inherited disorders, including cancer, heart disease, epilepsy, blindness and deafness, which affect dogs.
Textbooks often make sure students
understand what multiplication means rather
than offering exercises for learning multiplication facts.
It's easy to
understand the differences between Ionic and Doric architecture here: rather
than relying on
textbook descriptions, those differences come to life before her eyes.
A 2009 study found that eighth - grade students who were involved in hands - on science projects demonstrated a deeper
understanding of concepts
than students who were taught with traditional methods such as
textbook readings, lectures, and tests (Riskowski et al., 2009).
They are inclined to rely on prescribed
textbook scope and sequences to determine the curriculum calendar, rather
than on a foundational
understanding of the mathematics series.
Most of the time, it's easier to
understand grammar issues and writing techniques
than English
textbooks and writing manuals make it seem.
Which one is more likely: All basic thermodynamics and stat mech
textbooks are wrong, including the ones that make showing that there is no lapse rate a homework problem or that do it in the actual text, or some people who have a really hard time
understanding what a degree of freedom is or how to do an integral or mess with logarithmic expansions have made a mistake, the biggest of which is assuming that the DALR worked out in climate systems is stable in the absence of a driving thermal gradient and that air is locally truly «adiabatic», instead of just having a thermal conductivity that is slower
than convection?