The women's reunion rapidly rekindles a passion that — with stolen kisses and progressively steamier intimacy — disturbs this world's scrupulous order, a disruption that is more about hidebound tradition
than about religious belief.
So you are more concerned about a group of people trying to keep baby Jesus off the off the capitol lawn
than about some religious fanaticals trying to fly an airplane into the capitol?
Not exact matches
Will Bunch's CNN.com tirade earlier this week against television host Glenn Beck and David Barton - the founder and president of WallBuilders, a national pro-family organization that emphasizes history's «moral,
religious and constitutional heritage» - for allegedly creating «pseudo history» reveals more
about Mr. Bunch
than it does
about what Mr. Beck and Mr. Barton are presenting.
Why are you listening to black clerics over this issue, Blacks are having more kids out of wed lock
than whites, they are also like white, living in sin, but the church's say nothing
about having babies without a husband or sitting in church and living in sin, talk
about glass houses, and besides the marriages are Cival marriage not
religious marriage, what a bunch of hipocrites..
I personally hear the atheists I know complain more
than the
religious people
about others talking
about their beliefs, could just be the people I know though.
Keeping in mind that believing a dead man came back to life and ascended bodily into heaven is no more plausible
than anything Mormons believe, you have to wonder what Barnum would say
about all
religious people.
But it's nice to see
religious people are bigotted
about things other
than religion too, like other nationalities.
How
about we throw out Constantine and his pals excluding books from the Bible that teach how to develop a direct personal relationship with God, rather
than submitting to
religious authority?
Stevens offered not a word of concern
about whether
religious students might feel themselves to be less
than full members of the political community if, by order of the nation's highest court, their messages and only their messages are categorically excluded from the school's public arena.
We can assume that all the Justices sitting on the Court today, like other humans, have their own preferences and biases
about religion, but the judicial opinions of one of them, Justice John Paul Stevens, raise more
than a slight suspicion that some of his actions on the bench stem from animosity, if not to animal sacrifice, at least to certain less exotic
religious beliefs and practices.
This is more
about the free money they were getting
than anything to do with
religious freedom.
Yet as someone who cares
about religious liberty, I remain nervous, for there appears to be more
than one Mitt Romney.
Later, when interviewed in a 2006 article in the New York Times Sunday magazine
about current
religious thinking on artificial contraception, Mohler elaborated: «I can not imagine any development in human history, after the Fall, that has had a greater impact on human beings
than the Pill....
The Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C., with which I am pleased to be affiliated, was founded in the 1970s in large measure to combat the perception that an intellectually and morally impoverished understanding of the dominant American
religious traditions had rendered those traditions useless, or (as in the lamentable presidency of Jimmy Carter) worse
than useless in guiding Americans» thinking
about a sensible and responsible foreign policy.
I've posted more
than once
about the Obama Administration's often rather weak and sometimes contradictory attitude toward
religious freedom.
He cared
about people more
than His own reputation with the
religious establishment.
At least that way, the wedge of divisiveness between politicians can remain
about politics rather
than include their
religious views as well.
I have far more confidence in the ability of this system to find the truth
about the universe
than I do the
religious one.
Atheism is simply a lack of belief in god and says nothing
about how we raise our children (other
than implying that we don't brain - wash them with
religious indoctrination).
its not really atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking
about, you assume to know what something is
about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better
than religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more
than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its
about being aware of who you are?
It found that very successful scientists are
about 5 times as likely to have no current
religious affiliation (it's arguable if that equates more to atheism or agnosticism)
than the general population.
Catholics attended
religious services an average of 18 days per year more
than mainline Protestants in 1972, but by the first few years of the 21st century, the difference had dropped to
about six days per year.
You guys are hilarious, not only do the
religious argue
about which religion is better
than their own but they even argue
about practices within a specific religion.
(CNN)- Muslim Americans are more optimistic
about their future
than members of any other
religious group in the United States, according to a Gallup report released Tuesday.
About 40 % of evangelicals between the ages of 18 and 29 are likely to say homosexuality should be accepted by society, compared to 24 % of evangelicals who are older
than 30, according to the 2007
religious landscape survey by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.
Almost 80 percent of Americans identify themselves as Christians, with, despite all the talk
about growing
religious pluralism, no more
than 5 per cent claiming other religions.
«There's no issue in the world I care more
about than religious liberty.
It is therefore quite significant that a recent article by Bultmann seems to be by implication a defence of Ksemarm's position against an initial criticism by the Barthian Hermann Diem: Diem had maintained that when all is said and done Käsemann has presented Jesus as only proclaiming «general
religious and moral truths»
about «the freedom of the children of God», rather
than a message in continuity with the Church's kerygma.
I'm no more inclined to accept what Jesus said
about his
religious faith
than I am to accept yours.
Diana has covered renewal in Mainline churches as both a
religious historian and journalist for more
than a decade and is optimistic
about the future of Mainline Protestantism.
The Austrian mystic, Baron von Hügel, understood spiritual dryness better
than most
religious writers have, and he gives some graphic illustrations as to what to do
about it.
As debate continues over President Obama's assertion
about the
religious nature (or lack thereof) of the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist group, a new Pew Research Center study finds that more Americans across the board believe that Islam encourages violence more
than other religions.
To the extent that they are careless
about their instruction in the faith, or present its teaching falsely, or even fail in their
religious, moral, or social life, they must be said to conceal rather
than to reveal the true nature of God and of religion.»
who are they going to talk to other
religious people
about and tell each other that they are better
than THOSE people?
Huckabee's 2008 Iowa victory and Santorum's surge suggest that, in spite of the dominant stereotypes
about evangelicals, they value
religious authenticity more
than rhetoric and care
about more issues
than gay - marriage and abortion.
Psalm 10: 3 - 4 — This talks
about the wicked men, how they do nt have God in their hearts or in their minds, which is a fine piece of scripture but it can hardly be used for either myself or the maker of the video since we both seem to advocate a deep and personal relationship with the Lord rather
than letting a group of «
religious» people ruin it for you.
But
religious leaders spend almost as much time making you feel guilty
about actually thinking,
than they do raising money from the non-thinkers.
In more
than 30 years of pastoring and dealing with pastors, I have observed that often when a public figure, secular or
religious, shouts out in anger
about or against a particular subject, it's usually a sign of the inner turmoil of the person crying out around that very issue.
They were in fact more explicit and assertive
about the
religious and moral aims of their work
than were any of its theological traducers — including Eliade and his disciples.
How
about a study, that
religious Americans are more likely to support a war or blame all troubles on God, rather
than themselves... You believe or don't all you want, but please stop misleading people, with worthless studies and instead put more energy and resources to help those in need...
It just seems to me that as a writer / researcher who clearly knows better, it is really your job to attack, debunk and tear these assinine arguments
about Obama's
religious convictions to pieces rather
than giving them some kind of legitimacy.
Furthermore, White Mainline Protestants and Black Protestants were considerably less likely
than other denominations to hear
about either
religious liberty, abortion, or homosexuality.
Built around 9600 B.C., the site predates Stonehenge by
about 6600 years and places the origins of human
religious experience much farther back in the historical progress of our civilization
than scholars previously believed possible.
They call them peddlers of religion, and they do not mean that in a positive way, but rather are referring to people they believe are trying to push their own agenda of a psuedo -
religious toxic mix of some sort of
religious something, politics, power, control, personal profit (think $ $ $) and efforts to feel good
about ones self while at the same time looking down on neighbors (condescension) rather
than loving neighbors.
It's widely acknowledged and understood that athiests / agnostics know more
about the world's religions
than the
religious.
I think the average atheist knows more
about religious doctrine
than he does
about scientific matters.
I'm not getting the part
about Wheaton being more
religious than the southern schools
WW1 and WW2 have come and gone with little more
than a whimper from the
religious clods still stammering
about the «anti» next time!
Whatever their exact number, Christians are leaven in deeply troubled Pakistan whose Muslim majority disallows increasingly the Prophet's teachings
about restraint from violence and his injunctions to honor the Ummah (
religious community) Internecine Muslim murders are a daily occurrence in Pakistan, and, whatever the discrimination against Christians, it is more social and economic in nature and far less violent
than what Muslims do to one another.
The more accurate description of these results is to say that «
religious people are more ignorant
about other religions
than non-
religious people».