The basic idea is that countries would agree on a carbon price rather
than an emissions limitation.
Not exact matches
Further, it is not obvious to us that there are physical or economic
limitations that prohibit fossil fuel
emission targets far lower
than 1000 GtC, even targets closer to 500 GtC.
It is a more profitable
than advocating
emissions limitation and clean energy.
But the requirement that the developed countries «should continue taking the lead by undertaking economy - wide absolute
emission reduction targets» is vastly more stringent
than the provision by which developing countries are merely «encouraged to move over time towards» reduction or
limitation targets.
-- Not later
than 2025 and at 5 - year intervals thereafter, the Administrator shall review the standards for new covered EGUs under this section and shall, by rule, reduce the maximum carbon dioxide
emission rate for new covered EGUs to a rate which reflects the degree of
emission limitation achievable through the application of the best system of
emission reduction which (taking into account the cost of achieving such reduction and any nonair quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements) the Administrator determines has been adequately demonstrated.
For the avoidance of doubt, Gross Revenues shall (A) exclude monies received from any source other
than the sale of electric energy and capacity, including, without
limitation, any of the following: (i) any federal, state, county or local tax benefits, grants or credits or allowances related to, derived from, or granted to the Wind Energy Project or Grantee, including, but not limited to, investment or production tax credits, or property or sales tax exemptions, (ii) proceeds from financing activities, sales, assignments, partial assignments, contracts (other
than the power purchase agreement) or other dispositions of or related to the Wind Energy Project (such as damages for breach of contract or liquidated damages for delays in project completion or failures in equipment performance), (iii) amounts received as reimbursements or compensation for wheeling costs or other electricity transmission or delivery costs, and (iv) any proceeds received by Grantee as a result of damage or casualty to the Wind Energy Project, or any portion thereof and (B) include any revenues derived from Grantee's sale of carbon dioxide trading credits, renewable energy credits or certificates,
emissions reduction credits,
emissions allowances, green tags, tradable renewable credits, or Green - e ® products, any of which are allocated to Grantee, if applicable, through its participation in any voluntary registry, association or market - based exchange.
Further, it is not obvious to us that there are physical or economic
limitations that prohibit fossil fuel
emission targets far lower
than 1000 GtC, even targets closer to 500 GtC.
We propose here a new paradigm of anthropogenic impacts on seawater pH. This new paradigm provides a canonical approach towards integrating the multiple components of anthropogenic forcing that lead to changes in coastal pH. We believe that this paradigm, whilst accommodating that of OA by anthropogenic CO2, avoids the
limitations the current OA paradigm faces to account for the dynamics of coastal ecosystems, where some ecosystems are not showing any acidification or basification trend whilst others show a much steeper acidification
than expected for reasons entirely different from anthropogenic CO2
emissions.