By the end of a long day of critique, her «protective cloak» was at best in tatters, and perhaps that's the ultimate fate of most attempts for a media figure to live aggressively as a character rather
than an honest person.
Not exact matches
People trust eloquent speakers more
than honest ones — which doesn't mean you should start lying.
Let's be
honest, it takes more
than knowledge, position, and popularity at work to convince
people to see things your way.
Expect a few spammers, bots and trolls, but for the most part
people will be more
honest than normal.
And, to be
honest, I'm not the type of
person who ready to tackle the day at 4 a.m. I have, however, made it a point to wake - up no later
than 6:30 a.m. every day.
I don't see Christians as more
honest, more faithful in marriage, less violent, more giving, more polite, or more anything
than the millions of
people who are indifferent to religion and who only go to a church if there is a wedding or a funeral.
The loudest factions of Christianity and atheism aren't the largest, which presents the occasion for mutual understanding: open,
honest, introspective and rational discussion between groups of
people who share more in common
than not.
People should practice their religion at home or at their church and leave it out of the workplace other
than setting a good example of
honest behaviour.
To be
honest, it's more
than a little scary when the
people who are supposed to be spiritual role models for the next generation are seemingly lost in a sea of self - righteous, politicized sin that seems to be so far removed from what Jesus represented.
Just because YOUR disbelief was not
honest, doesn't mean that the disbelief of others is also dishonest, and it is arrogant of you to assume so and project your dishonesty on to other
people of whom you know nothing about at all other
than what they say in a few messages on an Internet blog.
I'm no stranger to
people - watching during service, but to be
honest it's more along the lines of «let's gauge all my dating prospects» or «let's take surreptitious pictures of the guy trying to stay awake»
than the things Powell was telling me about.
Would you consider a
person making a declaration of certainty one way to be more or less
honest than one making a declaration of certainty the other?
As well, it drives me crazy when sincere
people veer away from sincere «church talk» and out of habit or influence, start using the buzz words and «churchy» talk... I want to shake them and remind them they are better
than that... to go back to their most sincere and
honest use of language.
Other
than a few major cities, (not mentioning) most are incredibly safe and the
people very
honest.
They may go on a «mission» trip where their fellow churchgoers can see them, but put them in dealings with hardworking,
honest people and they behave worse
than the
people one would expect to swindle or harm them.
In fact my
honest opinion
people today are more uneducated and more uninformed
than ever.
And NAH, it seems you're more interested in putting
people down
than having an
honest debate.
«Zach has probably impacted more
people than all of us combined because there is something unique and special and
honest about these individuals that see it like it is and call it like they see it,» Kurt says.
One
person said that if Christians would be
honest (and stop cherrypicking their favorite passages to live by while ignoring the difficult ones), they would come to the conclusion that God is nothing more
than a giant hand that gives and takes away.
I know a great many Mormons
than just two and I can say that they are
honest, decent, hard working
people who have many positive attributes.
An
honest person who openly disagrees with you on a few things is a better choice
than a dishonest
person who claims they believe everything you do, and secretly disagrees with you... or even disdains you for your gullibility.
He will enter into
honest (and sometimes painful) encounters with his
people rather
than stay in the detached safety of professionalism.
I agree with the other reply here: IF there were a god with any real integrity, then he / she / it would probably prefer the
honest person who had followed their beliefs (and who had tried to live a «good» life based on those beliefs)
than a two - faced shyster who was trying to cover all the bases.
When it comes to
people who have been historically mistreated, abused, and sinned against, any attempt at whole relationship that skips this step of
honest understanding of history and heartfelt confession will be little more
than assimilation.
Then I feel better knowing that I am smarter, nicer, and more
honest than at least some
people.
Haven't we had lying Texas governors who use faith to win elections and are no more
honest about anything
than people in prison.
People who have spent time in real religions (eg: Mormonism, Scientology, Jehovah's Witnesses, evangelical Christianity, and Islam) realize though that it's more important to be
honest than it is to be strategic.
The temptation of our current culture is to cast the Church as a bureaucratic obstacle to wounded
persons» desire for God, and her pastors as «cold warriors» — but this, to put it kindly, is less
than honest.
These
people are sick no doubt but an
honest, objective, unbiased
person would find them no sicker
than your average liberal Democrat.
They also pledged to maintain their reputation for being «more spiritually
honest than the millions of
people who attend institutionalized churches every week and blindly go along with the programs, sermons and mindset that make American Christianity the colossal failure it is today.»
To be
honest sometimes I talk to them more
than people in real life these oats look deeelish!
To be
honest, I am not really a «salad»
person, the healthy ones at least — I can think of nothing better
than taking a plain salad and adding a whole heap of not so healthy additions; maybe tomatoes, avocado, capers, olives, cheese (s!)
To be
honest, I'm not a die - hard vegetarian or vegan, but we do eat FAR less meat and animal products
than most
people.
And keep being
honest with
people - there are more of us with «former food fears»
than you think.
People keep using stats to defend him because that's the only way to defend him.When you watch him most at times you he hardly wows you or is any special.Can i ask a question couldn't Chamakh or Bendtner or Aliadiere score about 15 - 18 goals with this super super creative arsenal midfield.I mean lets be honest if Chamakh in his first season should have scored 20 goals in EPL many people would still want him out you know why because watching every aspect of his game and also analyzing every aspect of his game he was below average in his time at arsenal to be honest.So its not only about stats because stats do nt tell me the whole story about a player though they are facts and don't lie the eyes do nt lie.And with this same eyes we look at players and say Aguero is better thab Bony, Costa is better than Remy, and
People keep using stats to defend him because that's the only way to defend him.When you watch him most at times you he hardly wows you or is any special.Can i ask a question couldn't Chamakh or Bendtner or Aliadiere score about 15 - 18 goals with this super super creative arsenal midfield.I mean lets be
honest if Chamakh in his first season should have scored 20 goals in EPL many
people would still want him out you know why because watching every aspect of his game and also analyzing every aspect of his game he was below average in his time at arsenal to be honest.So its not only about stats because stats do nt tell me the whole story about a player though they are facts and don't lie the eyes do nt lie.And with this same eyes we look at players and say Aguero is better thab Bony, Costa is better than Remy, and
people would still want him out you know why because watching every aspect of his game and also analyzing every aspect of his game he was below average in his time at arsenal to be
honest.So its not only about stats because stats do nt tell me the whole story about a player though they are facts and don't lie the eyes do nt lie.And with this same eyes we look at players and say Aguero is better thab Bony, Costa is better
than Remy, and so on.
@john0711 it's
people like you I don't get.Do you know Chamakh may have been a worse player
than Giroud but let's be
honest Chamakh was a better finisher
than Giroud.Even him was labelled as garbage.Can someone name a striker with exception of Gervinho (man he was awfully out of this world) who played for Araenal who Giroud had better finishing
than.Giroud is to me part of Arsenal's worst finishers ever and please let's not deny it and note I considered only «finishing»..
20,000
people tuned in while the two of them were on the Playstation and let's be
honest, it was a lot more entertaining
than what was going on on TV.
If you're
honest with yourself, you know exactly why this story plays better in Nashville
than the image
people saw when they looked at CJ2K.
I know it's hard to believe that
people might have their own opinions that might be different
than yours, but that doesn't make it any less
honest.
Tony i get what you are saying but at least when the time comes we will know who was right., As a
person it is better to be
honest and take responsibility for your mistakes.I still stand by my opinion Szczesny is better
than Ospina.
@Arsenal Girl Campbell only plays better
than Theo currently because Theo isn't in form.Having said that I think
people are over exaggerating his abilitues but I blame it on the awful performance of our wingers.Anytime Joel Campbell played to be
honest ge was nothing spectacular.All I saw ws hardwork in the form of tracking back to help the defence and being all over the place.He needs to make it this season or else he should be sold.The same is the case with Ospina who is good but his abilities are over hyped which I also blame a certain used to be 1st choice keeper here and that is» Mr. Mistake».
Your comments are very naive and idiotic.Even if he had a limited budget at that time it's not as if every player would cost him a fortune.Also it's not about the limited budget that makes him support his players to perform.It's his philiosophy.Even till this day he tends to support and persist with his players to bring out the best in them.If you think I don't know what am saying wait till they get fit.On Giroud if we are to be
honest he should have been dropped long ago even in his second season.It was never rocket science to know that the guy ws not starter quality.Tell me which team would have persisted with Giroud as a starter more
than Arsenal.He failed long ago and was really really benched like just last season.As for Szcz Wenger also did persist with him during the times he still wasn't performing.I hope
people won't deny this.He persisted till he could take no more of it.That was the reason why he brought Ospina into the starting 11.
Personally, I welcome — this being a debate site - real
people with real fan opinions and have no intention of saying less
than I mean, since to me that is hypocritical at worst or sitting on the fence at best, in true Alan Smith style (as opposed to fine proper and
honest, as they see it, pundits like NEVILLE, CARRAGHER AND SOUNESS, who are above all
honest and earn their corn - unlike Walcott - by doing the job they are paid to do.)
And if you were to stack up everyone who cares about Kettering Town, and everyone who cares about (say) Manchester United, well, there's THREE HUNDRED AND THIRTY THREE MILLION,
HONEST, DAVID GILL COUNTED THEM ALL of the latter, and there's only 81,000
people in Kettering, more
than a few of whom probably follow the red side of Manchester.
so teams that have done better
than us can see ways of improving but this guy cant see any!!!!! any
honest person knows that benzema, draxler, krychowiak, bender, etc are all obvious improvements to what we have and some possibly all of these are available for sure at a price... pedro was better
than what we have but he did nt go for that either... if he cant see we have a first team that cant win epl or reach semis of cl he should not be in the management business let alone getting 8m for spouting this kind of crap
I get what you are saying.If you watch him on televison he does not look like backup quality for arsenal but hey as
people here like it if you use his statistics he looks more
than capable as a backup.This should tell you that statistics and reality can be different.He looks terrible on television to be
honest.
(i know there are a lot of hardcore fans in the world, and let me tell you i love football and love arsenal even more but lets be
honest, its just a game)
than the rights of human called human rights if you havent heard of it and the freedom of
people, then there is something fundamentally wrong with you and your belief, like with the most
people on this world who go on babbling about conservative sh $ %
That's a lot of
people who are being less -
than -
honest in their relationships.
Your adopters may have been told that by the agency, however, many
people find that agencies have been less
than honest with all parties concerned.
On the positive side, a huge influx of cash and worldwide distribution channels beyond anything that a small business could ever dream of means that more
people than ever will have access to
Honest Tea, and thus, a healthier option
than soda or other high fructose corn syrup beverages.