Not exact matches
The complaint notes that
before the investment committee changed the Intel TDP allocations in 2011, the fees for the Intel TDPs ranged from 65 basis points to 71 basis points — already higher
than index - based target - date
funds such as those offered by Fidelity.
«Far more money
than before (about $ 9 trillion of assets, which represents about 30 % of total mutual
fund long - term assets) is managed passively in
index funds or ETFs (both of which are very easy to get out of).
For example, if you would have had 100 % of your non TSP investments in the Vanguard Wellesley Income
Fund (VWELX)
before the last bear market started in 2008 your investment would have only decreased approximately 9 % compared to a more
than 50 % drop in the DOW & S&P
indexes and you would have recovered all of your losses in less
than a year!
Conversely, had you had 100 % of your private accounts invested in an S&P 500
indexed fund or invested all of your TSP account in the C Fund just before the last recession in 2008 you would have experienced more than a 50 % drop in va
fund or invested all of your TSP account in the C
Fund just before the last recession in 2008 you would have experienced more than a 50 % drop in va
Fund just
before the last recession in 2008 you would have experienced more
than a 50 % drop in value.
I read a lot of books
before I started investing three years ago, and the data clearly show that
indexing usually leads to higher returns
than typical mutual
funds.
And since both types of
funds — active and passive — earn market - average returns
before expenses, investors who own actively managed
funds typically earn 1.75 % less
than those who own
index funds!
This is something that hasn't happened
before when so many people were invested in
index funds (more
than 42 percent of
fund investors now hold
index funds, a percentage that has never been larger in history, and that has almost tripled in the last 10 years).
In fact, a recent Fidelity survey found that many investors think
index funds, which attempt to match a market benchmark like the S&P 500 (
before fees), are less risky
than active
funds, which attempt to outperform a benchmark.1 That may help explain why during 11 weeks of heightened market volatility in 2015, investors bought
index funds but sold active
funds at seven times the average rate during nonvolatile weeks.2
Because of that, the Baa
index of Moody's may lag longer
than ordinary versus Fed
funds... but Fed policy has been called impotent
before, and usually just
before it shows its bite, as in the tech bubble of 2000, or the liquidity rally of spring 2003.
For both the actively managed
fund and the hedge
fund, those expenses more
than ate up the large amounts — 3.5 and 9 percentage points a year, respectively — by which they beat the
index fund before expenses.
Although one would expect using a professional adviser to improve an investor's performance, instead the investor pays a significant penalty... We found that load
index funds charged substantially higher fees — even
before counting the fees paid to the broker —
than true no - load (no 12b - 1 fee)
funds.
A new Morningstar study shows that investors are paying less in annual mutual
fund fees
than ever
before, in large part because they're increasingly moving to low - cost
index funds and ETFs.
• Far more money
than before (about $ 9 trillion of assets, which represents about 30 % of total mutual
fund long - term assets) is managed passively in
index funds or ETFs (both of which are very easy to get out of).