Sentences with phrase «than any position right»

We need a cf more than any position right now.

Not exact matches

«I think that networks are in a tough position right now, where they have shows that a lot of people watch — much more than cable shows that are considered «hits» — but they're not allowed to call them hits because they're up against an old system.»

And then there's the idea that this is a bipartisan problem - of extreme positions and uncompromising rhetoric - rather than one the anti-environmental right created.

People who have developed the right mental disciplines make more money, stretch their abilities more than their peers, enjoy higher positions at work, command more respect and form more meaningful pro...

However, right now we're in a better position than ever and there are some super exciting things on the way for Buffer users.

In an English - language publication, or any other left - to - right language, the right - facing page is a better position than the left - facing page.

The uptick in the shares reflects a belief that Netflix is now in a position to sign up more subscribers this year than analysts had previously anticipated, generating additional revenue that the company can spend on TV series and movies as it bids against rivals such as HBO, Amazon.com, YouTube and Hulu for licensing rights.

The performance goals upon which the payment or vesting of any Incentive Award (other than Options and stock appreciation rights) that is intended to qualify as Performance - Based Compensation depends shall relate to one or more of the following Performance Measures: market price of Capital Stock, earnings per share of Capital Stock, income, net income or profit (before or after taxes), economic profit, operating income, operating margin, profit margin, gross margins, return on equity or stockholder equity, total shareholder return, market capitalization, enterprise value, cash flow (including but not limited to operating cash flow and free cash flow), cash position, return on assets or net assets, return on capital, return on invested

Therefore, our best plan of action right now is simply to focus on managing our existing open positions, rather than taking on additional risk exposure.

Right - wing party Les Republicains in particular performed better than its center - left rival Parti Socialiste in the presidential first round and is likely to be keen to secure a stronger position when negotiating with Macron for key government positions.

No question, there's evidence that this relationship is alive and well, but given the uncertainty, the responsible analytic position right now is to be far more data - driven than model - driven.

Those with grandfathered unlimited plans just recently won an FCC case barring them from being throttled, so I'm in the best possible position right now — truly unlimited data, on a fast network, with no throttling, and because I'm willing to sign a contract and don't have a need to be able to break my contract at a moment's notice like a plebian, I also get phones cheaper than said plebians.

I'll be adding positions in Royal Dutch Shell plc (RDS.B), Chevron Corp. (CVX), Exxon Mobile Corp (XOM), ConocoPhillips (COP), BP plc (BP), Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) and Total S.A. (TOT), with BP yielding more than 6 %, right now.

Male MBAs are hired into higher - level positions right out of school and earn, on average, $ 4,600 more per year in their first job than their female counterparts.

I am not sure if superior is the right word, but if you don't feel that a position you hold is superior or perhaps more correct than the opposite position why would you hold it?

Mark and Tony are both in those positions (the fact that Mark has a bigger network right now than Tony doesn't erase the fact that they share an office into which most of us implicitly push them).

You are a sad, small - minded, individual and right now my sole consolation is that the content of your comment assures me that you yourself will never hold a «key position» and become anything more than the irrelevant hatemonger you are today.

However, with all this we have not yet got any further than the Socratic position; for, as Socrates would say, if this comes about, then it only shows that such a man had not understood what is right.

I find myself in the perverse position of wishing the paleocons were more right than they are in insisting on neoconservative distinctiveness.

The Church opposes contraception, and the approach at the time seems to have simply to stress the duty of Catholics was to obey this — a position which was, of course, entirely right, but which emphasised obedience and tribal loyalty rather than an understanding of the issues and a sense of involvement in standing up for what is right.

2) You can maintain your position from a faith perspective, and say this, but then I'd have to seriously question [a] your historical integrity (for example, the historical position of Revelations as canon, although more of a debate than the other texts, was still NOWHERE NEAR contestable enough for you to draw this sort of conclusion) and [b] your philosophical integrity (for example, if you dismiss Revelations because it doesn't support your position, i'm going to ask: by what authority do you think you have the right to discern this?

If someone told you that you are less than the rest and that you would not be allowed the same rights and privileges as others, how likely would you be to want to talk and understand that person's position?

The goal of The Gay Agenda was to force opponents of sod into a position where they would be seen as attacking the rights of so - called «gay» citizens, rather than opposing a specific deviant behavior.

Women today are in a far greater position than they were years ago to follow the obedience of Christ and lay aside their abilities and their rights.

I have noticed that the people with the most correct doctrince spend more time defending their position, rather than defending other people's basic human rights.

... the fear often is expressed that the «rather amorphous middle position termed «evangelicalism, living between a left wing capitulation to ethnology - sociology and a right wing reaction to the same disciplines, «seems more ready to expend their time and energy in defense of older formulations of Christian truths than to grapple with the matter of reformulating these truths in terms of new conceptual frameworks.»

The attack upon Bultmann's position from the right seeks to establish closer links than Bultmann will allow between historical knowledge and faith - knowledge, between the first and third of our categories.

To most Catholics it is less acceptable to censure those who defend the right to dissent than it is to censure those who appear to reject the official position on abortion.

While there is still a very vocal and active right wins, a broad centrist evangelicalism across the church gives a more unifying position than has previously been the case.

Playing in his preferred position, he has that knack of being in the right place at the right time, and he does more than his bit defensively as well.

Mert is better than cus in positioning, passing, sweeping If anything merts covers the right back by pushing to the half way line and going wide.

Wenger will carry on playing Ramsey on the right wing, My only concern with that is that Ramsey is too selfish, He always shoots instead of passing it to someone who is in a better position than him.

Right now in terms of Striker / winger / cb position even Spurs are ahead of us Striker SPURS Kane and Janssen Winger: ARSENAL Alexis and Campb / iwobi / ox / welb Centre Back Pair: SPURS: Vertonghen and Alderweirld (even though Koscielney is better than both)

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

We need right now it's» a DM and CB, so I prefer to pay # 22m for Carvalho who can play in these 2 positions than # 5m for Rabiot who is not at all a DM and who never played as CB.

Chambers — had a great season you look at the amount of football Bellerin has played recently and chambers has hardly featured but Chambers has still played a lot more minutes of football than bellerin this season not a natural right back but did a great job earlier in the season and a more central position looks to be where he'll play in the future but he was never going to be first choice straight away.

Better than Walcott and Chamberlain put together when played out of position on the right..

You may be right about bringing another in, not necessarily to first team but an experienced player coming off the bench is less likely to make silly errors than a youngster learning what is a very disciplined position.

Those two positions are more pressing than any right now.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

He could be better than Chamberlain, if he is given the chance to play in a right wing position (as a right winger, wingback or fullback).

Currently Chamberlain is better than him in the right wingback position.

But wenger has also got to play the everyone in the right positions, like ozil should be played in his preferred central role rather than on the left wing where he is relatively ineffective, hopefully he will be once walcott is back.

Please, do not give me excuses about injuries etc, we have had those the most since 2004, who to blame than Wenger, who has overplayed and played players in wrong position and did not purchase the RIGHT players in RIGHT places during summer, defensive midfield player and center back to cover Verminator.

Given the fact that we have 10 picks and we will likely ignore QB this year (right or wrong), it's completely reasonable to believe that we will come out with most of these positions in as good or better shape than what we had last year.

Dude, the guy always bluffs on his transfer plans... however I do think we won't get more than 2 players in January, but realistically we do nt need more than 2 signings... as long as they are in the right positions (cb and cdm), he is right in that our squad will start to come right again in terms of injuries come january (provided there are no more injuries)

so let me begin: - draxler is a talented dude but right now i care muuuuuch more about the efficiency and return and walcott i statswise (only goals / assists) about x times more proficient than draxler - barkley is a worse player than wilshere, do nt know why you would want him over wilshere - okay i give you that isco over ramsey - why are you including dybala, he isnt not even a similar player to the others or a fair comparison (not the same position, price class etc..)

Well to a point they are right, maybe we are luckier than your average PL club, but then we are NOT your average PL club, we are charged the highest ticket prices of any club in the EPL for starter's and we are now apparently debt free and according to certain sources inside the clubs Hierarchy can buy any player we want, in short we are financially as big as any of our competition with regards to the ability to buy in top quality talent, and while we don't have the money to burn that Man city or Chelsea have we are in a position to spend more and spend it more often as long as there is a degree of prudence.

@Eddy, what is I tell you that the position he is playing now (Right forward) is even more attacking than the one he was playing then (box2box)??

strange how people like mediocrity, if you knew I have more reason than many to like and support Wenger but I put Arsenal love before everything and only a fool or a blind can think that Wenger is doing good with Arsenal, I would not be upset if the team was in this position if all the required signing had been done and the team was managed and rotated correctly as no one has sure right to success.It only hurts when the requirements are not dealt correctly and are dealt only with silly excuses.Fools for the fools, some claim to love Arsenal...