Not exact matches
Rather
than go with the same old
explanation offered by the
religious that has proven itself false in the past?
A similar approach has been employed in recent catechetical courses, such as Anchor and Evangelium, in which
religious ideas and understandings are approached initially through paintings rather
than verbal
explanations.
You take someone else's
explanation for scripture because: a) Everyone else does, b) The person explaining is a
religious «leader», or c) It's easier
than thinking for yourself.
Consequently when in the life of the church cultural forms triumph over
religious content and faith disappears, and when in the course of time men begin to wonder what content these forms were originally intended to symbolize, the historic
explanations which they will advance will be given in terms of national or racial destiny rather
than in terms of a rediscovered
religious truth.
This is true, not because it contains, as it does, more exalted
religious ideas
than any other book, or expresses them better (this would be an
explanation of the Bible's superiority, not of its uniqueness), but because it stands in a unique relation to some unique and supremely significant events.
If the conservative churches are producing more personal
religious vitality
than the others, the
explanation is not likely to be found in one quarter only.
They are however, most certainly closer to an
explanation than the bible or any other
religious book.
Or consider the
explanations for
religious belief proposed by evolutionary psychologists, now recognised by most philosophers of biology as involving more theoretical assumptions
than empirical evidence.
One
explanation for their optimism is that Muslim Americans were hurt more
than other major
religious groups by the recession and have experienced more improvement in the recovery, the report said.
The
religious emphasis on otherworldly beliefs evolved, Wilson says, because supernatural
explanations seem to motivate human cooperation better
than factual ones.
That finding offers a new
explanation for past research showing women tend to hold more
religious or spiritual worldviews
than men.
In her review of Barbara Hepworth: Sculpture For a Modern World, Sue Hubbard expressed her view that the Tate had missed the opportunity to build a more revelatory show
than was actually achieved by choosing not to use in the show
explanations of Hepworth's work in terms of her
religious beliefs which Lucy Kent had explored in a catalogue essay.
There is no «proof» that these are more
than natural occurrences (or, admittedly, neither that they are not) and require, for now, really contorted tortuous
explanations (snow / ice getting covered with soot, Arctic really getting lots warmer
than the few tenths of a degree of the global average just the past 2 - 3 decades, etc.) why AGW is causing them — though they are professed with
religious conviction.