Sentences with phrase «than average results even»

But considering the capture quality, you can manage to get better than average results even on the 5MP module of this Zen device.

Not exact matches

The results were pretty shocking, even to the researchers: Those who saved the bread for later had far more stable blood sugar levels (an average, peak blood sugar levels were as much as 30 % lower, a very significant change) than the volunteers who are the bread first.

Average prices are likely even higher than the figures shown above, as a result of high - end homes.

But even if you are able to qualify based on better than average credit, you could reduce your credit card rate by two to three points, which would result in significant interest cost savings over the term of the loan.

To be fair, I was steaming twice a day, more frequent than the average facial steamer, but even with a weekly steam, I still see great results.

Miller is averaging 16 pitches per inning — not a strenuous pace at all, and in fact, just one more pitch per inning than during the regular season — and even his state on Tuesday, when he seemed a little tired and with less control than usual, resulted in two scoreless innings.

The first study to test the skills of FBI agents and other law enforcers who have been trained in facial recognition has provided a reassuring result — they perform better than the average person or even computers on this difficult task.

Even for Complete Genomics downsampled to 30x average coverage, the coverage distribution is still wider than the one resulting from HiSeq2000.

Though three years» worth of improvements in compression techniques might have enabled the film to look even better here than it did on the Vault Disney DVD, the apparently simple porting yields favorable results nonetheless, in spite of the presence of a second film which leaves the original having an average bitrate a shade over 1 Mb / s less than the Vault Disney's 5.94 average.

The impact of even a slightly better - than - average quality teacher — one whose effectiveness ranks at the 60th percentile, for example — still has significant economic results, raising an individual student's lifetime earnings by $ 5,300, or a class of 20 students» aggregate lifetime earnings by a total of $ 106,000.

The results for the typical student in a Harlem public charter school — approximately 25 percent of the city's charter students — were even more pronounced in math, on average gaining seven more months than his or her peer in a district public school, but less than a full additional month in reading.

Operating mostly in Memphis with mixed results, ASD has selected two middle schools in Nashville, Madison and Neely's Bend, for potential takeover even though data shows the number of students scoring proficient or advanced at the schools are nearly seven points higher than the ASD average.

As a result, the average high - wealth district raises more than three times as much I&S revenue as the average low - wealth district, even at a lower average tax rate.

In my small unique book «The small stock trader» I also had more detailed overview of tens of stock trading mistakes (http://thesmallstocktrader.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/stock-day-trading-mistakessinceserrors-that-cause-90-of-stock-traders-lose-money/): • EGO (thinking you are a walking think tank, not accepting and learning from you mistakes, etc.) • Lack of passion and entering into stock trading with unrealistic expectations about the learning time and performance, without realizing that it often takes 4 - 5 years to learn how it works and that even +50 % annual performance in the long run is very good • Poor self - esteem / self - knowledge • Lack of focus • Not working ward enough and treating your stock trading as a hobby instead of a small business • Lack of knowledge and experience • Trying to imitate others instead of developing your unique stock trading philosophy that suits best to your personality • Listening to others instead of doing your own research • Lack of recordkeeping • Overanalyzing and overcomplicating things (Zen - like simplicity is the key) • Lack of flexibility to adapt to the always / quick - changing stock market • Lack of patience to learn stock trading properly, wait to enter into the positions and let the winners run (inpatience results in overtrading, which in turn results in high transaction costs) • Lack of stock trading plan that defines your goals, entry / exit points, etc. • Lack of risk management rules on stop losses, position sizing, leverage, diversification, etc. • Lack of discipline to stick to your stock trading plan and risk management rules • Getting emotional (fear, greed, hope, revenge, regret, bragging, getting overconfident after big wins, sheep - like crowd - following behavior, etc.) • Not knowing and understanding the competition • Not knowing the catalysts that trigger stock price changes • Averaging down (adding to losers instead of adding to winners) • Putting your stock trading capital in 1 - 2 or more than 6 - 7 stocks instead of diversifying into about 5 stocks • Bottom / top fishing • Not understanding the specifics of short selling • Missing this market / industry / stock connection, the big picture, and only focusing on the specific stocks • Trying to predict the market / economy instead of just listening to it and going against the trend instead of following it

Even though using the 5 - year average FCF yield on mid cap companies (third best single factor we tested) over the test period would have given you a higher return than the 12 - month FCF yield, the results for the other market size companies would have been a lot lower.

This is borne out by their 2012 results — the management fee component of total revenues was $ 7.0 mio, which appears to be a little better even than I mentioned, at an estimated 2.16 % of average AUM.

Think of a picture of a population pyramid — as the widest / youngest part of the pyramid, the bottom, grows up to the age of reproduction, there are so many of them that even having a lower average of children than the generation before can result in an increased population, or a boomlet.

«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.

The older than Mauna Loa results of CO2 contents used in the models adopted by IPCC are ice core proxy values of carbon dioxide content, which are incompatible with any one of directly measured values, already therefore that, even at their best, they are averages of some centuries.

As the results show none of the average correlations for the various monthly series are even close to being statistically different than the months used in the Gergis paper and namely the series in the table for Sep - Feb.

say it has been predicted that «the average temperature in the semiarid northwest portion of China in 2050 will be 2.2 °C higher than it was in 2002,» and they report that based on the observed results of their study, this increase in temperature «will lead to a significant change in the growth stages and water use of winter wheat,» such that «crop yields at both high and low altitudes will likely increase,» by 2.6 % at low altitudes and 6.0 % at high altitudes... Even without the benefits of the aerial fertilization effect and the anti-transpiration effect of the ongoing rise in the air's CO2 content, the increase in temperature that is predicted by climate models for the year 2050, if it ever comes to pass, will likely lead to increases in winter wheat production in the northwestern part of China, not the decreases that climate alarmists routinely predict.»

According to the research results, the small monocrystalline solar cells (22 % efficiency) used in the study were able to generate «much more» than the typical 5 to 10 microwatts that typical cardiac pacemakers use, as even the lowest power output measured by the devices was an average of 12 microwatts.

The study has a number of interesting results: it demonstrates that the average non-pecuniary damages award has more than doubled between the two periods studied — even when adjusted for inflation.

«While the LexisNexis study points out that legal professionals are even more inundated than your average white collar professional, the results also suggest some possible ways technology can help them cope with the ever - increasing amount of information coming through their doors,» said Allan McLaughlin, senior vice president of research, litigation and business information solutions for LexisNexis.

I suspect that election by the diverse Bar of Ontario produces a more diverse group of Benchers than the average or even well - meaning shareholders of private corporations — and given how public the campaign is, we members have only ourselves to blame if we don't like the results.

May I suggest that: a) «the MLS game» (list low, hold offers 5 - 15 days & scramble to get your own offer in the meantime); b) the prevalence of simultaneous presentation of 5 - 50 competing bids (full info on all bids only known by Seller Agent); c) the new - prominence of Teams / mega-Teams / office - within - an - office sub-Brokerages; d) the often «coached - from - afar» suggestions about how Registrants can maximize GCI, minimize expenses and offset competition - induced, listing - fee discounts; e) Average Prices resulting in everyday Co-op Brokerage fees of $ 15K, 20K and more and f) the high percentage of Registrants who have not experienced any market conditions other than «Prices perpetually Up, Seller always Wins, Buyer puts - up or Shuts - up»; g) Electronic signification — you can no longer look in the whites of your competitor's eyes, because half of them aren't even physically present.