Not exact matches
This recommendation comes
from finance professor Anat Admati, who says: «Economists tend to think that
beliefs and behavior are guided by incentives and rational processing of information, but I know that there is more to it
than this simple model, and that other disciplines have much to say.
Expanding on this
belief, they assessed over 15,000 leaders
from more
than 300 organizations across 20 industries and 18 countries to determine which conversational skills have the highest impact on overall performance.
This line
from the musical Cabaret is emblematic of a entire cluster of
beliefs about how money is way more important
than anything else.
«That JJ raised more
than $ 37 million
from people across the country and around the world in the wake of Hurricane Harvey is confirmation of that
belief.
Running a trade surplus means that a country sells more to foreigners
than it buys
from them, and there seems to be an implicit
belief that exports are what a hard working country produces, and imports are the equivalent of its consumption, so that a trade surplus means that the country earns more
than it spends, and the larger the surplus, the more likely the ants in that country are especially productive, thrifty, morally upright, and perhaps fond of sensible clothing.
[50:40] Don't fall in love with your product or service [51:55] Fall in love with your customers [52:00] Become and owner, not an operator [52:30] Hire people smarter
than you [55:20] Advice for a passion project [55:35] A
belief is a poor substitute for experience [55:50] Give people an experience [56:00] Branding is identity [56:05] Identity is the strongest driving force we have [57:50] Hunger trumps intelligence any day [58:40] Where does your hunger come
from?
Since the fundamental value of an asset in a financial market is an aggregation of the stochastic stream of future dividends, trading at prices higher
than the fundamental value is only profitable when there is a widespread
belief that other traders will continue to buy at prices even further away
from fundamental values.
This higher
than average level dates
from the 1960s, when French governments promoted diesel in the mistaken
belief that it was cleaner
than gasoline.
Ken and I always held the
belief that rather
than wanting to take vacations to get away
from life all the time, we wanted to build a life we didn't want to escape
from.
I had in my heart and tongue the Name of Allah when ever I had fears, troubles or depression of any kind but
from Jan 05 1995 when had lost my father and second brother in a car accident, it was the time I really felt am alone at age of 33 to face all the challenges my father has left upon me to run and manage among other partners therefore had been investigating the Quran as to understanding every word of it rather
than to memorize it, have been did a lot of reciting verses of prayers begging God to look upon me and give me strength... am sure through such difficult times if I had no faith in God I would have perished and lost every thing long ago... Another thing my heart always gave me signs and my mind gave me logic of what to believe although have read many books abroad in my youth of many
beliefs out of curiosity but could not
belief in other
than that God is one and Muhammed is his last prophet in all
belief of the Quran he brought upon me / us in all that it says... Should mention at times had experienced dreams seeing signs and warnings long in advance of things going to happen A year or more before losing my father in a car accident I had seen him in my dream good bye wearing white cloth and going to board a tourist ship all crew dressed in white uniform rolling a red carpet on front of him and when was on the top of the stairs weaver smiling good bye... seen in another dream how or wealth will be stolen and what I will hold... so many things like that..
So how do you go
from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my
beliefs on no other evidence
than «it just can't be accident».
I was lucky enough to find the church that accepted me and my
beliefs as different
from the mainstream but valid and no more right or wrong
than anyone else's
beliefs.
Many people in the pews have different
beliefs than the people collecting
from them.
No, I think he meant the
belief that suffering is a «kiss
from Jesus», that women can't make decisions about their own bodies, that the RCC's wealth, power and reputation are more important
than doing what is right, and that children are there for the pleasure of the clergy.
As a result, evangelical liturgical practices tend to be far more fluid
than the practices of more high church traditions, as the practices flow
from a
belief that spiritual regeneration precedes liturgical practice — and regeneration can not be reduced down to easily identified physical characteristics.
The only thing further
from God
than these
beliefs, is to not believe at all.
Scholasticism Theology moved
from the monastery to the university Western theology is an intellectual discipline rather
than a mystical pursuit Western theology is over-systematized Western Theology is systematized, based on a legal model rather
than a philosophical model Western theologians debate like lawyers, not like rabbis Reformation Catholic reformers were excommunicated and formed Protestant churches Western churches become guarantors of theological schools of thought Western church membership is often contingent on fine points of doctrine Some western Christians believe that definite
beliefs are incompatible with tolerance The atmosphere arose in which anyone could start a church The legal model for western theology intensifies despite the rediscovery of the East
We can assume that all the Justices sitting on the Court today, like other humans, have their own preferences and biases about religion, but the judicial opinions of one of them, Justice John Paul Stevens, raise more
than a slight suspicion that some of his actions on the bench stem
from animosity, if not to animal sacrifice, at least to certain less exotic religious
beliefs and practices.
In truth Intelligent Design is really nothing more
than a Relgious
Belief given the cloak of Science, but
from a Scientific perspective it is only a Hypothosis at best.
You share the same
belief as them, and the fruit
from that
belief is the same, judge mental holier
than thou, etc..
Michael «As a gay man I appreciate there efforts and support, but I think putting up this sign isn't really the best way to get through to people, all it does is create more hate, intolerance, and separation, I am not a christian but I am very spiritual, and putting up this sign implies that all gay people are atheists which is the furthest thing
from the truth, I have no problem with religion, I have a problem with those who use there religions to control and hate others, same applies with atheism, if you don't want to believe in anything
than fine, just don't push your non
beliefs on me.»
Woods writes: «The structure of the novel suggests that Clarence Wilmot's fall
from faith has somehow caused this carnage and confusion; that the failure of
belief will not have awakened modern America to reason, only delivered her to more craziness
than anyone can bear to contemplate.
It was written by many people over the span of hundreds of years, it is tribal rules
from the infancy of our development and arguably is not a good book at all but full of hatred, spite and unspeakable violence, and you arent allowed to use «faith» as your proof of existence... faith is nothing less
than the throwing away of reason i.e.
belief without evidence.
As a gay man I appreciate there efforts and support, but I think putting up this sign isn't really the best way to get through to people, all it does is create more hate, intolerance, and separation, I am not a christian but I am very spiritual, and putting up this sign implies that all gay people are atheists which is the furthest thing
from the truth, I have no problem with religion, I have a problem with those who use there religions to control and hate others, same applies with atheism, if you don't want to believe in anything
than fine, just don't push your non
beliefs on me.
If a politician expressed a
belief in a supernatural force other
than God would Christians respectfully decline
from commenting?
Being with my husband for all these years has definitely made me shift over closer to his side
than before, but my
beliefs are best defined as nebulous so he's never been able to get enough grasp of them to pull them
from me, lol.
Nor will you ever get any «proof» Niknak... other
than maybe a lighting bolt and a voice
from the heavens which are incredibly rare The
belief in any god is based upon faith and faith can not be proven.
No portrait is more radical and disturbing to traditional Christian
belief than that put forth by the Jesus Seminar, a group of scholars who regularly meet to sort out the historically valid
from the invalid in the New Testament narratives.
It takes more
than a few seconds to recover
from such strong addictions that have not only been bred into our DNA but reinforced over many years of
belief and practice.
This objection is, for the lack of a better name, nothing more
than «egg mysticism»: the
belief that eggs are somehow so potently driven to create zygotes that no scientific manipulation will prove capable of deflecting the egg
from its preordained path.
It wasn't the summer that brought an end to my doubt, but it was the summer I encountered a different Jesus, a Jesus who requires more
from me
than intellectual assent and emotional allegiance; a Jesus who associated with sinners and infuriated the religious; a Jesus who broke the rules and refused to cast the first stone; a Jesus who gravitated toward sick people and crazy people, homeless people and hopeless people; a Jesus who preferred story to exposition and metaphor to syllogism; a Jesus who answered questions with more questions, and demands for proof with demands for faith... a Jesus who healed each person differently and saved each person differently; a Jesus who had no list of
beliefs to check off, no doctrinal statements to sign, no surefire way to tell who was «in» and who was «out»; a Jesus who loved after being betrayed, healed after being hurt, and forgave while being nailed to a tree; a Jesus who asked his disciples to do the same...
I am highly educated (more
than one degree,
from highly regarded schools), I am skeptical and do not use the Bible as my only source for my
belief.
The motivation for this pastoral practice is clear: it is the
belief that the love generated by a spiritually coherent community is greater
than the sum total of the love emanating
from its individual members» lives.
Rather
than go highlighting or cherry picking different stories in the ancient text that point to very disturbing characteristics, (because that would bog us down away
from my point and launch a ti.t for tat against someone who has already displayed
belief over evidence is what matters to him), I will add to my «doctrine» statement that has inflamed and dominated your attention.
a set of values,
beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to give them direction and a sense of right and wrong is fine, but organized religions are no more
than large corporations, and like any large corporation are only focused on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much money as they can
from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a sense that they alone can offer salvation... for a price (although they are very cleaver about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)
Am not anti-Christ nor Anti-Jewish just like all Muslims am a monotheist so must be rather Anti-Polytheists & Disbelievers... but believe me it is not hatred but rather pityness for the innocents and hardness towards the wicked transgressors... Guess that is all about it unless few of our brother got the message wrong!?! Since we learned
from the Quran verses that there will be in paradise
from the Jews, Christian and others
from other
beliefs... and since God forgives any thing else other
than to assign for him partners as polytheists do, then that means many of Christians and Jews are monotheist towards God although might show otherwise of fears
from dominant doctrine... As it seems few Christians have realized some how they were wrong some where, then had to introduce that Trinity to correct it to show as if monotheist but made another mistake by having God the One Divided into Three then and remained Divided as Three as now and for eternity...!?
Using
belief as a means to separate the believers
from the non-believers is no different
than to separate on race or color.
There is no truer freedom
than the freedom
from the psychological conditioning called religious
belief.
I need to emphasize the actuality of the superject (or, what is the same, the superjective existence of the actuality) because the misinterpretation of the principle of process has often gone hand in hand with the mistaken
belief that «actuality» can be properly predicated of an occasion only while it is in the process of becoming.3 This widespread and deeply rooted mistake deserves more attention
than I can give it here without digressing extensively
from my main thesis.
It was a statement of
belief only the shortest step removed
from the actual experience of the church — hardly more
than a description of that experience.
The educated modern man needs no reminder how It has been of the best to «just go along» with the evangelical and his
beliefs rather
than suffer the wrath that might be so ordained against him by those who have carved out their virtuous
beliefs from an age old written scripture.
Therefore in any description of the phenomenon of Christian
belief, even when it comes
from within the Christian tradition rather
than from outside it, you must expect to find the believer's own understanding and evaluation involved.
THAT is the backlash you are feeling — the resentment that comes
from trying to force your
beliefs on others, rather
than «hatred» of you for having those
beliefs.
And Schweitzer had grasped,
from his very earliest days, the truth that all culture, all human interchange and social life, what we comprehensively call civilization, springs
from nothing more substantial
than our visions and dreams, our religious
beliefs and convictions.
There is nothing in the theory of evolution, nor in astronomy, or in geology, nor in paleontology, or any other branch of the sciences which contradicts Christianity, or any other type of theism (except Mormonism — we know scientifically that the Indian peoples of the Americas are not descended
from the Jews — which is a key point of
belief for them, much more central
than there having been a literal Garden of Eden is for classical Christianity or Judaism).
They fight because Christians have a «holy
than thou» superiority complex that stems
from the
belief that only one
belief can be right and all others are going ot hell.
I think you and I share a lot of
beliefs, opinions and attitudes, so rather
than trying to explain my self in further detail, why don't you start by explaining what you see differently, and we can take it
from there?
It is this
belief more
than any other that redeems life
from solitude and fate
from tragedy.
No theory need cover the entire range of social realities, of course, but it is worth noting that sociologists seem to have gained more mileage
from this framework for their considerations of individual
beliefs than for analyses of large - scale institutions.
In another sense the future event (which the synoptics emphasized more
than John does) is merely a completion of the movement
from sin to forgiveness, unbelief to
belief, that is going on here and now, in the person and presence of the Son of man (5:27), Jesus himself.