Sentences with phrase «than birth control»

These methods of birth control can prevent unwanted pregnancy up to 20 times better than birth control pills, patches and vaginal rings.

I guess all these years of faith based, science - free Republican politics (abstinence education reduces unwanted pregnancy more than birth control info does!

In fact, when we hear the word «hormonal problems», we are conditioned to think of solutions going no further than birth control pills, hormone creams and pallots.

Much more than a birth control method.

Pregnancy (while normally a normal process) actually poses much greater risk to the average woman's health than any birth control pill because estrogen and progesterone levels are MUCH higher during pregnancy than when any woman is on BC.

They last for much longer than birth control shots or pills, and most IUDs work for at least 3 years or up to 5 years.

Babies cost a lot more than birth control pills!

Although the hormonal IUD has a significantly lower dosage of progestin than the birth control pill, there's a possibility that it can still negatively affect vulnerable women, according to Millheiser.

Not exact matches

«Women saved more than $ 1.4 billion in out - of - pocket costs for birth control in 2013 alone,» the senators wrote on May 25, in a letter to Mulvaney.

Splinter News spoke to several OBGYNs from the Mayo Clinic and the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists who all said the same thing: The levels of hormones introduced to your body via hormonal birth control are far lower than what your body naturally produces, and especially lower than what it produces while pregnant.

Specifically, women on average have higher core body temperatures than men, especially women using hormonal birth control.

Like pregnancy, combination hormonal birth control methods increase the risk of serious blood clots (see graph below), especially in women who have other risk factors, such as smoking, obesity, or age greater than 35.

In fact, most American Catholics disagree with some of the Vatican doctrines (birth control, for example); there are Baptist Churches that don't treat women as less than men in God's eye, etc..

More than 50 % of abortions are women who did use birth control.

Speaking purely from a who has to pay perspective — birth control is FAR cheaper than 9 months of prenatal care and a hospital delivery, which these days is in excess of $ 10,000.

I don't think that its feasible to expect everyone to follow NFP, though I'm personally a huge proponent and believe women need more education on their bodies and menstrual cycles, and condoms while not «moral» persay or in line with the church's teaching are a much better option than hormonal birth control or Plan B as they are simply a barrier method not an abortificant.

The public has had more than enough of the service Ms. Fluke offers in exchange for benefits, but for the time being she can still get birth control at no cost if she chooses a plan that doesn't offer it.

These women want Jesuit priests to pay for their birth control... what could be more sleazy than that?

It's cheaper to pay for birth control than an unwanted pregnancy if you can't afford to take care of the child.

I see religion driving it's political tools in congress and the states to control women's reproduction more than any time since the 1970s, even trying to turn the clock back and put the kybosh on BIRTH CONTROL.

I'd rather pay for birth control than children.

In other words, I make the choice to do something that might alter my physical being if something goes wrong... can I make the birth control argument, since birth control is not 100 % full proof, that this gear is cheaper than the medical cost of my injuries if I fall?

Going to church weekly made black Protestants less likely to say birth control coverage should be mandated (64 %) than not (25 %).

You can't argue that Hobby Lobby can object because they're paying for it, it's actually the employee's benefit and the insurance company is paying for it, it's no different than an employee taking their paycheck and using it to buy birth control.

I had a Catholic priest look me in the eye no less than 3 weeks ago and tell me that birth control give you a 30 % chance to get cervical cancer (which is a straight up lie).

The psychological impact inside marriage of excessively limiting se.x could be quite harmful, and the health impact of accidental pregnancy by using imprecise methods for occassional se.x are much higher than the affects of any form of birth control.

Their old recruiting method of no birth control and huge families is less popular than it used to be.

Beside that it is not like that named self as» «pre-ci-se»» proving him self ig - nor - ant but it is that Muslims merry more than wife and not believe in birth control as to the number of children they get, they consider ab - or - tion is a sin... and believe that each child is born, comes to life along with his sub-sis-ten-ce and that God provide that for him and that parents should not fear poverty or the in - abil - ity to support...!

If you don't have ten kids than you are practising birth control on your own anyway so quit being hypocrites.

In the US most Catholics treat Catholicism as a cultural club more than a religion with over 80 % having no issue with «artificial» birth control.

Modern contraception is, however, a much more pleasant alternative, and, used properly, can be more effective than the traditional methods of birth control (such as coitus interruptus, the rhythm method, or the local contraceptive potion).

More than two weeks ago, the Department of Health and Human Service issued a mandate instructing all employers that provide health insurance to their employees include the option for paid birth control, the morning after pill and intrauterine devices.

The United Nations conferences on population have called for social changes, such as more education and opportunities for women, as well as birth control clinics rather than reliance on the demographic transition.

Leading up to the issues of birth control and abortion he declares that marriage is a natural right of man rather than a religious or civil institution.

Although Pope John Paul II has made clear his disagreement with the revolutionary approach of liberation theologians, Catholic social teaching is more radical than the popular opinion of the present Pope, based on his views about birth control and sexual morality, might suggest.

1) Charities spend their income on necessities, such as food and utilities, which ever - so - slightly re-orients our economy toward recession - resistant products, rather than luxuries 2) Charities spend their money quickly, but on independent schedules, making for a smoother stimulus effect on the economy 3) Charities make purchases tax - free, meaning that $ 1 spent by a charity generates a full $ 1 of private economic activity; furthermore, much of those tax revenues are recovered as income tax on the grocery stores, utility companies, etc. that might not have received that income otherwise 4) Charitable giving is by far the most democratic way to improve society; from birth control to bombers, government assuredly spends money on something you don't like, and charitable giving restores your say - so 5) Charitable donations are tax deductible, meaning you keep those tax dollars in your local community 6) Charitable donations provide the funds necessary for volunteers to serve the needy, thus giving «the average citizen» a chance to meet and interact with the needy, breaking down stereotypes

@Gaunt «Between them they represent the main choice of birth control for women» = > less than 2 % is the main choice?

But a CNN / ORC International survey also indicates that you shouldn't expect them to pay any more attention to the new pope's teachings on issues like birth control than they paid to his predecessors.

Birth control shouldn't be necessary, but condoms are better than abortions.

More than two - thirds of Americans support mandated coverage of birth control in health plans Date: April 22, 2014

Just like they want to say that women want the taxpayers to pay for birth control, rather than the truth which is that insurance would cover it like other health issues.

Catholic hospitals MUST be held to the same standards as other hospitals in the USA, that means if they must offer other options including birth control, or morning after pill than so be it.

Birth control is far more than simply a quality of life issue.

The phony pro-lifers now drop health care, (which is needed for life) are against birth control (Never offer any money to help the kids they want so badly to be born) The catholic church is no different than taliban, al queda, kkk or other terrorist organizations.

Dreweke pointed to a study detailing the increased use of long - acting reversible contraceptives (such as IUDs and implants) among teens; although the study was only conducted among women who already used contraception, the efficacy of longer - acting contraceptives is higher than those of other birth control methods.

gerald, birth control pills do more for women than prevent pregnancy.

Birth control is cheaper than babies.

Guess what, alot of those Catholics wind up cost the taxpayer more than the cost of birth control.

They see it in the birth control legislation in Massachusetts and Connecticut; they see it in the Catholic pressure to remove welfare agencies that have birth control clinics from local community chests elsewhere; they see it in the Catholic objection to divorce laws that are much more flexible than the law of the Church; they see it in the attempts to have non-Catholic hospitals adopt the Catholic ideas of medical ethics in the field of obstetrics.

Although no contraception is 100 % effective, the IUD is one of the most effective forms of birth control available according to Planned Parenthood, with less than one out of every 100 women getting pregnant each year.