Although a few members have been prominent supporters of charter school expansion, the group has tended to support traditional public - school interests like greater funding for struggling schools and pay raises for teachers rather
than choice proposals.
Not exact matches
The Tier 6
proposal is nothing more
than a false
choice of accepting severely reduced pension benefits or joining an inefficient 401k style pension system.
City Councilman Robert Jackson told the standing - room - only crowd at Thursday's meeting that he has many questions about the
choice proposal and how to improve the neighborhood's schools, and he urged parents to work together to find answers rather
than battling each other.
Education Week quoted a former associate superintendent of the Cincinnati schools, who blamed the
proposal's failure on the fact that it «would have applied to nearly all teachers, rather
than allowing veterans the
choice of opting into the new system.»
When they insist that ideas like school
choice, performance pay, and teacher evaluations based on value - added measures will themselves boost student achievement, would - be reformers stifle creativity, encourage their allies to lock elbows and march forward rather
than engage in useful debate and reflection, turn every reform
proposal into an us - against - them steel - cage match, and push researchers into the awkward position of studying whether reforms «work» rather
than when, why, and how they make it easier to improve schooling.
While charter schools and digital learning are thought to be the safest
choice options for political elites to promote, tax credits are even more popular
than charters, and vouchers, the most controversial
proposal, also command the support of half the population when the idea is posed in an inviting way.
Moreover, independents are more supportive
than members of either party of expanding private school
choice for disadvantaged students, the centerpiece of Governor Romney's
proposals for K — 12 education reform.
The conservative House's opening bid, produced back in July, calls for trimming the education budget by $ 2.4 billion — less
than four percent — while ignoring Trump's school -
choice proposals beyond a modest bump (of $ 28 million) for charter schools.
Smarick has attempted to devise an accountability regime that is more nuanced and sensitive to the unique missions of private schools
than other
proposals to impose state regulations on private educational
choice.
The most common
proposal for school
choice at the federal level would send federal money for schools educating low - income students directly to students and families themselves, who could then spend it anywhere they want, rather
than to the schools, as is currently the case.
Their budget
proposal would slash the Education Department's budget by more
than 13 percent, or $ 9 billion, while providing $ 1.25 billion for school
choice, including $ 250 million for private school vouchers.2
The major principles undergirding charter schooling —
choice, deregulation, and so - called accountability — had already attracted significant attention long before 1988, and
proposals to break up the «monopoly» of school districts had been building for more
than a decade.
According to Department budget documents, the
proposal «would support LEAs in establishing or expanding student - centered systems that: (1) differentiate funding based on student characteristics, providing disadvantaged students more funding on a per - pupil basis
than other students; (2) offer a range of viable school options and enable the Federal, State, and local funds to follow students to the public school of their
choice; (3) make school performance and funding data easily accessible to parents; and (4) empower school leaders to use funds flexibly to address student and community needs.
This, along with wildly exaggerated climate damage scenarios, is needed to justify aggressive short - term interventions such as the Al Gore or Stern
proposals.14 Since calculated net benefit results for a two - hundred - year horizon are extremely sensitive to the
choice of a discount rate, the debate over the discount rate is far more
than technical.
This was a safe
choice for her in some respects, especially since counsel for both parties had expressed that it viewed the DoJ
proposal far less negatively
than that of the respective adversary.
Radio Canada has reported that the
proposals of the Justice Minister have received a tepid response from some groups who feel that imposing the
choice of a single expert on parties will create more debates
than it seeks to solve.
Dominating more
than 70 % of the life insurance industry, the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), has incorporated third gender as a
choice in its
proposal forms.