In contrast, single individuals of an older age felt less comfortable with closeness
than the coupled individuals (see Table 3 and Figure 1).
Furthermore, the interaction between partnership and age, F (2, 1663) = 5.70, p = 0.003, η2 = 0.01, revealed that single individuals aged between 31 and 60 had less faith in others
than coupled individuals (see Figure 2).
Single individuals between the ages of 18 and 30 were more comfortable with closeness
than coupled individuals similar in age.
Schachner et al. (2008) argued that the singles were older
than the coupled individuals since the singles needed more time to find a partner but in case of the present study this is not possible.
The singles in the representative study were generally younger
than the coupled individuals which contradicts the findings of Schachner et al. (2008).
Not exact matches
The estate tax, also known as the death tax, is currently a 40 percent levy on estates greater
than $ 5.49 million for
individual filers or about $ 11 million for married
couples.
Individuals with a net worth of close to or more
than $ 11 million ($ 22 million for
couples) can still lower the tax hit to their heirs with the use of trusts and estate - planning strategies.
(
Individuals who make more
than $ 75,000 or
couples who make more
than $ 150,000 would be phased out of receiving the credits.)
Besides, even if you are eligible to contribute directly to a Roth IRA (which means a modified adjusted gross income below $ 112,000 for
individuals and $ 178,000 for married
couples filing a joint tax return), the maximum you can set aside this year is just $ 5,500 if you are younger
than 50, and $ 6,500 if you are older.
He wants to roll back Bush - era tax cuts for
individuals making over $ 200,000 and
couples making more
than $ 250,000.
High earners —
individuals making more
than $ 200,000, or jointly filing
couples earning $ 250,000 or more — also pay an additional 0.9 percent Medicare tax on all income.
Additionally, there will be a Medicare surtax of 3.8 % on all investment income for
individuals with Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) greater
than $ 200,000 or
couples filing jointly with MAGI greater
than $ 250,000.
Individuals filing as single and making less
than $ 114,000 this year and married
couples who make less
than $ 181,000 and file taxes jointly are eligible to contribute the full amount to a Roth IRA.
Deism is the recognition of a universal creative force greater
than that demonstrated by mankind, supported by personal observation of laws and designs in nature and the universe, perpetuated and validated by the innate ability of human reason
coupled with the rejection of claims made by
individuals and organized religions of having received special divine intervention.
Now we have this wonderful choice (or free will): We can either believe that these desires we were created with had everything to do with a terribly gruesome human sacrifice a
couple thousand years ago and plead for forgiveness through that murdered innocent
individual in order that we might be chosen to be forgiven for being born this way; or we can be tortured for a ridiculously longer period of time
than we were actually alive in this sinful state (that we were unwillingly, unknowingly, forcefully thrust into).
When people read a newspaper or watch the nightly news and hear about a Colorado baker refusing his services to a gay
couple, the letter of the law and the dogmas of his church count less
than the determination of which
individuals suffer more from the law.
Deism is the recognition of a universal creative force greater
than that demonstrated by mankind, supported by personal observation of laws and designs of nature and the universe, perpetuated and validated by the innate ability of human reason
coupled with the rejection of claims made by
individuals and organized religions of having received special divine revelation.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less
than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a
couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one
individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant
individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last
couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two
individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future
than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!
He's won just about every
individual honor, accolade and prize there is to win, as well as a fistful of league titles in England and Spain, more
than a
couple of Champions League trophies, Euro 2016 with Portugal and a partridge in a pear tree.
The sheer talent and
individual skill of AFC's players ensured a
couple of goals and victory rather
than our flowing style and the chances that are automatically created.
I am a Licensed Clinical Social Worker with more
than eighteen years experience working with
individuals,
couples and groups.
For more
than 25 years, Debbie has offered compassionate and effective therapy and coaching, helping
individuals,
couples and parents to heal themselves and their relationships.
And while Mayor Bill de Blasio has proposed a «millionaire's tax» (which would increase the income tax rate for
individuals making more
than $ 500,000, and
couples making more
than $ 1 million) as a means of generating transit funding, it has yet to gain steam.
Skelos conceded that high - income earners —
couples who make $ 2 million a year and
individuals who make $ 1 million — will see less of a tax reduction under this new structure
than they would have had the so - called millioniare's tax been allowed to sunset at the end of the month as scheduled.
A report by the NYC - based and labor - backed Center for Working Families overlaid state income tax data on top of Senate Districts and found fewer
than four percent of residents in 29 of the 32 districts are currently being impacted by the income tax surcharge, which kicks in at $ 200,000 for
individuals and $ 300,000 for
couples.
And get this logic, courtesy of Senate Finance Chairman John DeFrancisco: «The only people who [will] have... a greater tax [
than in] 2008 are those earning a million as an
individual, $ 2 million as a
couple.
Nothing could be sadder
than seeing some of the men and women in law enforcement, some of whom are in this room, who have saved
individuals because of the use of Narcan, only to have that
individual die, just a
couple of months later.»
During his fifth State of the City address, the mayor said his administration would «redouble» its efforts to increase the income tax rate for
individuals who earn more
than $ 500,000 a year and for
couples who make more
than $ 1 million.
The proposed city income tax hike would raise the rate for
individuals making more
than $ 500,000 and married
couples earning over $ 1 million from 3.876 percent to 4.41 percent.
There have only been a
couple of dozen instances since 1999 in which state - level candidates have received donations from more
individuals in a six - month filing period
than Cynthia Nixon did in just 24 hours.
«We also found that
couples in which both
individuals have equal levels of education are now less likely to divorce
than those in which husbands have more education
than their wives,» said Christine R. Schwartz, lead author of the study and an associate professor of sociology at the University of Wisconsin - Madison.
Schwartz and Han found that
couples married between 2000 and 2004 in which both
individuals had the same level of education were about one - third less likely to divorce
than those in which husbands had more education
than their wives.
«The strong evidence that abnormal TDP - 43 protein is involved in the development of ALS,
coupled with models that may replicate ALS more faithfully
than other tools, may speed development of therapies for the thousands of
individuals diagnosed with this devastating disease.»
It is the first study looking at the effects on fertility of fat
couples, rather
than just
individuals.
•
Couples» health insurance may work out to be less expensive per head
than individual policies.
When researchers studied the genetic material of 825 white American
couples, they found fewer differences in the DNA between married people
than between two randomly selected
individuals within the same race.
A
couple of the markers also can indicate whether the
individual is on the «Celiac Disease spectrum» (rather
than just simply having a non-celiac gluten sensitivity).
Since then, I've been with lots of
individuals, but nothing gets me more turned on
than having sex with a
couple that I've met online.
There is a restriction to the number of dating preferences, this could be an issue as some
individuals and / or
couples do have more
than a single dating preference.
But it's not just married
couples - a 2009 study from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill found that after studying 7,000
individuals over a period of a few years, those who were in relationships and moved in with their significant others were twice as likely to be overweight
than their single peers.
Whilst your judgement and comparative judgement will tend to match up, there will always be a
couple of
individual pupils whose outcomes diverge — pupils who do much better or worse on comparative judgement
than you'd have predicted.
In 2017, 85 percent of benefits to
individuals with provisional income of more
than $ 34,000, and married
couples with income greater
than $ 44,000, are taxed.
The deduction amount begins to phase out for
individuals with MAGIs of more
than $ 65,000 and
couples with more
than $ 165,000.
To be eligible,
individual filers with modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) below $ 80,000 and
couples filing jointly with incomes of less
than $ 165,000.
Under current law, an
individual earning less
than $ 80,000 (or $ 160,000 for married
couples filing jointly) may claim up to $ 2,500 as a deduction for interest paid on qualified education loans during the year.
If you're on Medicaid because you've qualified for Supplemental Security Income, for example, your income must be less
than $ 674 for an
individual and $ 1,011 for a
couple.
If you've made a profit, that gain may be taxable (generally only if the profit is more
than $ 250,000 for an
individual or $ 500,000 for a married
couple filing jointly).
It's obviously impractical for an
individual investor to buy shares of every company in the market without the use of exchange traded funds (ETFs), but you can understand the advantages of owning more
than just a
couple of companies.
Individuals who earn no more
than $ 80,000 and
couples earning no more
than $ 160,000 are eligible for the full American Opportunity Credit, which basically expands on and replaces the Hope Credit.