The reason: such biofuel may end up causing rather
than curing climate change, according to recent studies.
Not exact matches
There's nothing more important
than engaging the brightest young minds in science to
cure disease, work on
climate change, and find new energy sources.»
In effect, it is treating the symptoms of
climate change rather
than curing the underlying condition.
Many scientists think green pressure groups and the IPCC exaggerate the perils of
climate change, and many experts regard cap - and - trade and the like as a
cure worse
than the alleged disease.
Economic models that fail to include the benefits of CO2 and the serious exaggerations of
climate models and are being used to advocate «
cures» that are much worse
than the non-existent disease.»
If it happens that I am wrong and the
climate experts are right, it is still true that the remedies are far worse
than the disease that they claim to
cure.
-LSB-...] you can accept all the basic tenets of greenhouse physics and still conclude that the threat of a dangerously large warming is so improbable as to be negligible, while the threat of real harm from
climate - mitigation policies is already so high as to be worrying, that the
cure is proving far worse
than the disease is ever likely to be,» Ridley said in the 2011 Angus Millar speech on «Scientific Heresy,» reposted in its entirety at the skeptical blog Watts Up With That.
In your opinion, given the progress to date, do think that a total expenditure of 30 billion dollars on so called
climate science, for no results to date — no breakthroughs, no predictive ability, no benefit to mankind — was a better use of funds
than, say, trying to find a prophylactic for Ebola, or even a
cure?
The prescribed
cure is worse
than the disease; the mitigation policies proposed to date would deliver no measurable change to the
climate or sea levels but would cost the world dearly.
We are supposed to believe their declaration of a global
climate catastrophe based on trivial changes in world temps, while ignoring the evidence that their claims lack actual data and that their
cures are far worse
than the potential problem.
He genuinely believes he has
cured HIV, and knows more
than every other
climate scientist combined, and that he is entitled to a seat in the House of Lords.
So while alternative facts won't
cure life - threatening diseases or stop them from spreading faster
than ever as the crisis continues, together, real
climate scientists and medical professionals will.
Usually these overpriced snake oil
cures are worse
than ineffective, they are in fact to the detriment of the environment /
climate / health that politicians and officials claim will be improved.