Sentences with phrase «than developed countries did»

In fact, 2015 marked the first year that developing countries saw more money invested in clean energy than developed countries did.

However, developed countries always have higher levels of private debt than developing countries do, partly due to very low access to credit and credit cards in developing countries.

Not exact matches

Currently, they pay less than developed countries for drugs, so companies don't make as much money there.

We're doing better than the average country in the G20 — a group of the world's most developed countries.

There are more than 220 million women in developing countries who don't want to get pregnant, but who lack access to family planning information and contraceptives.

These uncertain times call for different measures and communication tools than we have used in the past... There are more than 65 million citizens of the world recognized as refugees by the United Nations, and we are developing plans to hire 10,000 of them over five years in the 75 countries around the world where Starbucks does business.»

There are more than 65 million citizens of the world recognized as refugees by the United Nations, and we are developing plans to hire 10,000 of them over five years in the 75 countries around the world where Starbucks does business.

If hunger (responsible for more deaths every year than war or disease and the loss of more lives than AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis combined) is not attributable solely to inadequate production of food, but rather insufficient availability of food, why isn't more being done to reduce the shameful levels of food loss occurring in developing countries?

@ larryking listen jock wenger could never coach anyother club because no big club would go six season without a trophy there is no way wenger could go to madrid and go two season without a trophy no way in hell he would be fired in no time bmunich fired klinsman less than half season look at the real madrid coach grave yard pelligrinie made 95 + points last season that amount would win the league in almost any country yet he got fired i can go on if fergi goes two seasons without a trophy am sure he gone i love arsenal but football is about winning trophies wenger has hypnotize you i do nt care arsenal have gone five years without a trophy and six witout the league not even a carling cup or fa cup and loosing all our best players all for money all this talk about wenger and his youth policies i can count on both hands all the players that came through arsenal youth system that went on to be world beaters look at the current crop walcott nasri diaby denilson bedtner clichy none of these are world class they have improve minimal @ arsenal compare that to barca their youths pedro and co are world beaters event the great vanpercy who we rate he would never leave arsenal because all that chance wenger gives him he would» t get at other big clubs this does not make sense we buy young players they take ages to develop most do nt» t then we sell them or they leave because they want to win things that how you grow pretty soon that top four will become very hard to stay in if we get out of that then what i wish all you wenger fans luck am all out of patients with him last chance this year................

Although diarrhoea is less common in the UK and often less serious than in developing countries, a number of babies do die every year in the UK as a result of diarrhoeal dehydration, deaths which could easily be prevented by the timely use of ORT.

Asking candidate countries, as it has been done with Turkey by the current French and German administrations, to develop a looser coordination rather than giving them EU membership, is simply the «outsourcing» of a primarily EU domestic problem.

The logistics of doing science in Turkey can be harder than in countries with scientific infrastructures that are better developed.

«Disasters occurring in developing countries, whether human - caused or natural, cause more numerous and severe mental consequences than do disasters in developed countries,» she says.

Many scientists and environmentalists warn that the government's present strategy of simply storing the plutonium could do more harm than good because it does nothing to reduce the risk of environmental disaster, and, rather than discourage other countries from developing nuclear weapons, it could provoke them to increase their efforts.

More than 200 million women in developing countries are sexually active without effective modern contraception even though they do not want to be pregnant anytime soon, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive health research group.

The results, Thompson points out, would likely differ in less - developed countries where children don't have equal access to education; academic achievement in these places is shaped more by opportunities than genetics.

Yet, even if every planned reactor in China was to be built, the country would still rely on burning coal for more than 50 percent of its electric power — and the Chinese nuclear reactors would provide at best roughly the same amount of energy to the developing nation as does the existing U.S. fleet.

Some of them include: carefully monitoring one's diet in order to keep blood sugar levels in check; using insulin injections as needed to maintain optimal levels in those whose bodies don't produce the hormone; keeping a close eye on blood sugar levels by using special kits that measure insulin and sugar in the blood; and following an exercise routine in order to keep blood pressure levels in check.As with any disease or condition, doctors and researchers are constantly seeking new ways to treat and manage diabetes.People are more concerned about using harsh, synthetic medications than ever before, but now there are a growing concern across the globe to as how cure it.people in many developing countries — particular in Africa — have been using herbs to treat and cure diabetes for years.I have never believed it till i was cure of diabetes.I came in contact with Mr.Clifford who told how he was cure of his diabetes through a herbal doctor in Africa, i made a contact to Dr.ASIEGBU ODIGWE after wish i explain my condition to him, he prepared a herbs for me, today the lab result is negative.i'm sharing this for people that are in my formal condition.Williams Jeffrey is my name, you can contact Dr. ASIEGBU ODIGWE through Email: [email protected] or call [phone].

So, if we believe these OECD numbers (which the WSJ apparently did in this blog post), U.S. teachers work 15.3 % more hours per year than do their colleagues in other developed countries.

Basically, they include a large chunk of the industrialized OECD countries that are the ordinary reference group for the United States, along with a smattering of developing countries that also do better than us in math.

This is largely due to poor starting salaries, however, the report did find that after 10 years experience teachers in England do earn more than average compared to other developed countries.

We can not paper over the fact that a large number of other countries have shown that it is possible to develop considerably higher skills in their youth than we are doing

The district level is adjusted a second time based on the extent to which the U.S. does better or worse than students in a set of countries with developed economies, as measured by the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA).

American middle and high school teachers report spending more time at the front of the classroom than teachers in nearly every other country in the developed world.9 While U.S. teachers deliver instruction for about 80 percent of their workday, the international average is around 60 percent — and teachers in high - performing nations like Japan, Korea, and Singapore spend only about one - third of their time providing instruction directly to students.10 We know that it does not have to be this way for U.S. teachers.

For that, the U.S. health system generally delivers worse health outcomes than any other developed country, all of which spend on average about half what we do per person.

The International Fund may invest in emerging markets, which are generally more volatile and can have relatively unstable governments, social and legal systems that do not protect shareholders, economies based on only a few industries and securities markets that are substantially smaller, less liquid, more volatile and may have a lower level of government oversight than securities markets in more developed countries.

As for the international developed market stocks, a basket of different countries will likely do better than a simple US exposure, even if the dollar continues to fall.

Before the 2008 crash, emerging market did much better than developed countries.

In the shelter setting, the decision to use a treatment protocol other than the AHS protocol can be a deliberate «war zone» approach to treating HWD — in human medicine, treatment options in war zones or developing countries do not always reflect the best recommendation available, but are better than no option.

It is very important that different countries DO NOT adopt different standards for tails and that those standards, when developed, reflect what is typical of the breed rather than what prominent individuals might prefer.

Rather than spending money in remedial programs, we would do well to help developing countries with their infrastructures: sewage treatment, clean water, minimal electricity, agricultural supplies, etc...

Nowhere are the benefits of the lighting that developed countries take for granted more achingly on display than in a recent post at The Lede blog by Patrick Lyons, which focused on an Associated Press story and photograph from Conakry, Guinea — where kids were gathered like moths around streetlights in an airport parking lot to do their homework.

But Mr. Revkin, I actually think this question is off — it is impossible to really answer it without getting into the debate, which comes up a lot on DotEarth as elsewhere, about what right we have to dictate to developing countries that they pursue more expensive growth strategies than we ourselves did.

Rather than spending time talking about what emissions reductions would do to the wealthy in the developed countries lets address the poverty stricken in developing countries.

Now, the United States, as a highly developed country, as I said before, per capita, consumes much more energy and emits much more greenhouse gases for each individual than does China.

Higher density sources of fuel such as coal and natural gas utilized in centrally - produced power stations actually improve the environmental footprint of the poorest nations while at the same time lifting people from the scourge of poverty... Developing countries in Asia already burn more than twice the coal that North America does, and that discrepancy will continue to expand... So, downward adjustments to North American coal use will have virtually no effect on global CO2 emissions (or the climate), no matter how sensitive one thinks the climate system might be to the extra CO2 we are putting back into the atmosphere.

«The possibility that a country like India could move to a fully renewable electricity system within three decades, and do it more economically than the current system, shows that the developing countries can skip the emission intensive phase in their economic development.

Coalescing around the finance issue, developing countries appeared more united in Bonn than at previous talks this year and collectively rejected a 20 - page draft agreement they said didn't address their concerns.

There's been a sense this year of developed countries hiding behind negotiations on other issues, such as agricultural policy, to avoid reaching the point where money has to be talked about, but developing countries want to see that richer nations are doing more than just expressing sympathy and empathy and instead are putting their money where their mouth is on climate action.»

A global median of 54 % say that rich countries such as the U.S., Japan and Germany should do more than developing countries to address global warming, because they have produced most of the world's greenhouse gas emissions so far.

But only four - in - ten Americans say rich nations should do more to address climate change than developing countries, while half of U.S. respondents say developing countries should do just as much.

Why would a developing country do as much or more (proportionally with its size or capability) than an already developed one?

And this is not easy for the majority of the developing countries, I recognize that, which is why climate finance, tech - transfer, and capacity building are so crucial because if we don't meet this goal, we will be living in a world much warmer than the 2ºC target.

When mitigating anthropogenic global warming is projected to require greater than 80 % lower fossil energy use, how do we provide the transport fuel and energy for rapid growth by developing countries while sustaining OECD economic growth when the Available Net Exports of crude oil — after China and India's imports — have already declined 13 % since 2005, and Saudi Arabia may need to import oil by 2030?

(maybe most of you are too cool to remember that sort of moment... but think of something equally bad like the time you accidentally set something on fire and it started getting out of control...) I think it will be worse than that... Seems like to me we need to be much, much, more certain before we go making policy all over the earth that could actually harm us... or maybe not quite so bad, but really not desirable, harm many developing countries and distract them from addressing real environmental land use and energy production problems that would actually help the environment and save human lives now, today... but keep an eye on the future... not suggesting head in the sand stuff... just let's stop the panic... if you have to panic it's probly too late... most people don't behave terribly rationally while panicing...

Developed countries would have to achieve a reduction of more than 85 percent (relative to 2005 emissions) in 2050 to stabilize CO2 at 450 ppmv if the developing countries don't begin participating until 2020.

However, it is unlikely that the world will address climate change in this wholly cooperative fashion — more likely, it will be years before developing countries are willing to comprehensively price their emissions, and even when they do, it may be at a lower rate than prevailing in the European Union and United States.

Energy consumption is growing faster in developing countries than in developed countries and is forecast to continue to do so.

He said India would not have reached even two tonnes per capita by 2030, and emissions per head would always be less than the average in the developed world, which needed to do more on finance and technology for the poorer countries.

Each person living in a developed country does far more damage to the planet than any poor African; every extra Briton, for instance, has the carbon footprint of 22 more Malawians — and the poor will suffer first and worst from climate change.