We expect interest rates to gradually rise against a backdrop of sustained economic expansion, and high - yielding dividend stocks typically suffer more when rates rise
than dividend growers, our analysis shows.
Not exact matches
While some of these newer metrics show
dividend stocks and / or
dividend growers performing slightly better
than the broader market, it's certainly not the slam dunk for
dividend stocks that was initially implied by the Ned Davis graph.
Guest contributor Tony DeSpirito explains a «
dividend stock paradox» in which higher - quality
dividend growers are less expensive
than the interest - rate sensitive (and arguably riskier) high yielders.
Post spin - off we'll end up owning two high quality companies and more
than likely two
dividend growers.
RBC research found that U.S.
dividend payers and
dividend growers outperformed the S&P 500 between January 1994 and November 2015 by a modest margin and with volatility only slightly less
than the benchmark.
She highlighted ProShares Russell 2000
Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400
Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL), which «jumped more
than 30 % apiece in 2016 to become the top diversified ETFs of 2016 in their respective categories.»
As you know I have filled my portfolio almost exclusively with
dividend growers rather
than chase current yield.