Sentences with phrase «than dividend stocks»

Okay, so this applies to all stock investing, but I'd argue that it's more difficult to determine when to buy and sell growth stocks than dividend stocks.
New government debt notes will be more profitable than old ones, and they'll be safer than dividend stocks.
Rental properties have four advantages though that make them more appealing than dividend stocks.
And I'd rather invest in stocks with higher capital appreciation than dividend stocks for now (since I'm younger).

Not exact matches

Allan Small, a senior investment adviser with DWM Securities, likewise recommends growth - with - income stocks because they can beat inflation with a one - two punch, rather than just with capital gains or dividends.
This Toronto - based property and casualty insurance company has increased its dividend by more than 50 % over the past three years while its stock price has climbed from $ 35 to $ 62.
While retirees shouldn't abandon dividend stocks, many investment experts are now looking for companies that provide a little growth with that income, rather than just a high yield.
That means weighting stocks in an index by qualities such as earnings, cash flow, dividends and book values rather than the sheer size of their market caps.
«The potential for the declaration of a special dividend sooner than expected could represent another catalyst for the stock,» the firm's analyst writes.
«The potential for the declaration of a special dividend sooner than expected could represent another catalyst for the stock
The biggest losers were energy (XLE), consumer staples (XLP) and materials (XLB), all down more than 7 percent amid riding bond yields — which makes dividend stock yields less attractive and overrode other factors, like stronger oil prices and a weak dollar.
Since 2012, when the company launched the largest share repurchase program ever, Apple has returned a little more than $ 100 billion to shareholders in stock buybacks and dividends.
Buying back stock is, for example, Warren Buffett's preferred way of returning cash to shareholders (rather than paying a dividend).
The tax cut and excess federal spending may boost some areas of the economy, but thus far, it has not produced anything more than a modest boost in capital spending (most of it from capital intensive technology companies) but a surge in stock buybacks and dividend increases, Apple being a case in point.
Buffett is right that, for most of his stock - picking history, shareholders have likely been better off leaving their money in his care rather than siphoning the cash into their own accounts by way of dividends: Since 1965, Berkshire Hathaway stock has delivered annualized returns of nearly 21 %, more than double the S&P 500.
This year, just two of the 10 dividend companies we list here have yields that low, which should reinforce the notion that there is more to picking dividend stocks than seeking out the company with the highest yield.
The stocks that hedge funds have largely ignored tend to be much larger than the hotels, have less debt, grow earnings more slowly but consistently, and pay bigger dividends (an average yield of nearly 3 % for the S&P 500 constituents, compared with 2 % for the index overall).
Known for building tanks and nuclear submarines, General Dynamics has been focusing its funds on investing in R&D, repurchasing stock, and kicking back steady dividends to shareholders rather than shelling out on big acquisitions.
There is also opportunity abroad: Non-U.S. stocks with the highest dividend yields (average price / earnings ratio of 15.8) are cheaper than domestic counterparts (23.1), according to O'Shaughnessy Asset Management.
Think about it; if you were unlucky enough to buy into the stock market at the peak in 2008, just before the financial crisis hit full force, your gains (excluding dividends) wouldn't buy you much more than two loaves of price - fixed bread at Loblaws and a bag of President's Choice sour grapes.
That could benefit the Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund, which has more than 55 % of its portfolio in U.S. dividend stocks.
But in the more than 10 years Kelly has been CEO, Southwest's stock has climbed from the mid-teens to the $ 40 + it is today, with consistent dividend payouts.
These risks and uncertainties include: Gilead's ability to achieve its anticipated full year 2018 financial results; Gilead's ability to sustain growth in revenues for its antiviral and other programs; the risk that private and public payers may be reluctant to provide, or continue to provide, coverage or reimbursement for new products, including Vosevi, Yescarta, Epclusa, Harvoni, Genvoya, Odefsey, Descovy, Biktarvy and Vemlidy ®; austerity measures in European countries that may increase the amount of discount required on Gilead's products; an increase in discounts, chargebacks and rebates due to ongoing contracts and future negotiations with commercial and government payers; a larger than anticipated shift in payer mix to more highly discounted payer segments and geographic regions and decreases in treatment duration; availability of funding for state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs); continued fluctuations in ADAP purchases driven by federal and state grant cycles which may not mirror patient demand and may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; market share and price erosion caused by the introduction of generic versions of Viread and Truvada, an uncertain global macroeconomic environment; and potential amendments to the Affordable Care Act or other government action that could have the effect of lowering prices or reducing the number of insured patients; the possibility of unfavorable results from clinical trials involving investigational compounds; Gilead's ability to initiate clinical trials in its currently anticipated timeframes; the levels of inventory held by wholesalers and retailers which may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; Kite's ability to develop and commercialize cell therapies utilizing the zinc finger nuclease technology platform and realize the benefits of the Sangamo partnership; Gilead's ability to submit new drug applications for new product candidates in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes in its stock price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
My reasoning: Return would be lower than Dividend Investing above because index funds need to hold stocks yielding 1 and 2 % as well as those yielding > 3 %.
That strategy seems waaaayyyy less risky than actively picking stocks of supposedly «reliable» stocks that issue dividends, which could be cut at any time due to shifting industry trends and company performance.
Companies in the S&P 500 are on track to give investors more than $ 1 trillion in stock buybacks and dividend increases this year, according to Howard Silverblatt, a senior analyst at S&P Dow...
I absolutely do not believe that mutual funds are a better investment than individual stocks (companies that pay rising dividends over time) over the long run, so I invest the rest of my savings in a taxable account (as well as maxing out my Roth IRA every year, of which individual stocks are purchased).
If you've ever had occasion to look into the academic research comparing different types of returns from stocks that have different characteristics, as a class, dividend stocks tend to do better than the average stock over long periods of time.
While stocks are riskier than bonds or cash investments, they have much higher returns over the long run and many issue dividends on top of this.
Of course, in recent years, stock prices have grown much faster than earnings and dividends, driving the P / E far above its historical average and the dividend yield (D / P) far below its historical average.
Pass - throughs will counter that in many cases, people who own stock through 401 (k) s and IRAs don't have to pay capital gains or dividend taxes, and so their profits are only taxed at the corporate rate, which is lower than the top individual rate (and would be much lower under this plan), putting pass - throughs at a potential disadvantage.
It's common to object to the dividend yield as a measure of valuation, given that companies have devoted more of their earnings to stock repurchases than dividend payments in recent years.
These are defined as stocks that historically paid a persistently higher - than - average dividend (as a percentage of their share price) over time.
There are alternatives that can protect investors from future inflation that are less volatile (TIPS) or offer a better return profile (REITs and even high quality dividend stocks) than commodities.
creation of additional shares of Series C convertible preferred stock; or (iii) effect a change of control, liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company in which the holders of Series C convertible preferred stock would receive an amount per share less than the original issue price plus any declared but unpaid dividends on such shares of Series C convertible preferred stock.
With rates at historic lows, many investors have used high - dividend stocks, rather than low - yielding bonds, in pursuit of income.
When the stock market dividend yield yields more than a 10 - year US treasury bond yield, it's generally a good sign to invest in equities.
As noted, it is a bit of a gamble, and we see it more as that than a long term dividend stock.
These funds invest in stocks that pay dividends in line with or higher than the broader market.
The purchase price of each Share will be (i) not less than the net asset value per Share (the «NAV Per Share») of the Company's common stock (as determined in good faith by the board of directors of the Company or a committee thereof, in its sole discretion) immediately prior to the Expiration Date (as defined in the Offer to Purchase)(the date of repurchase) and (ii) not more than 2.5 % greater than the NAV Per Share as of such date, plus any unpaid dividends accrued through the expiration date of the Tender Offer.
(5) Except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split - up, spin - off, combination, or exchange of shares), the terms of outstanding awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Options or stock appreciation rights or cancel outstanding Options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for cash, other awards or Options or stock appreciation rights with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options or stock appreciation rights without stockholder approval.
Can dividend investing help smoothing this out, so you will not be pressed that much selling your stocks for income (4 % rule) and using dividends rather than your principal.
You may not have added to your positions but you stayed on course which is more than most people have done and if you held quality dividend stocks you were still getting paid during that rocky period.
Longrundata.com is wrong more often than not with dividend info on Canadian stocks.
Dividends on its $ 3bn of preferred stock will be taxed at the 35 per cent rate for foreign dividends, rather than the 14 per cent rate that would prevail in the US, according to people familiar with the arraDividends on its $ 3bn of preferred stock will be taxed at the 35 per cent rate for foreign dividends, rather than the 14 per cent rate that would prevail in the US, according to people familiar with the arradividends, rather than the 14 per cent rate that would prevail in the US, according to people familiar with the arrangements.
Those who are willing to purchase it presumably will be compensated by a lower per share price than full voting rights stock would command and / or by a higher dividend rate.
As you can see, there was a lot more movement around the stock price than the dividend payment.
Historically, for shareholders participating in the DRIP, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (the «Plan Agent») used cash dividends to purchase shares of NHF in the secondary market when the price of NHF's shares, plus estimated brokerage commissions, was less than NAV, or distributed newly issued common shares when the price of NHF's shares, plus estimated brokerage commissions, was equal to or greater than NAV.
This Model Portfolio only includes stocks that earn an Attractive or Very Attractive rating, have positive free cash flow and economic earnings, and offer a dividend yield greater than 3 %.
The end result of this is that portfolios consisting of more cash - generating dividend stocks tend to have far less volatility and suffer gentler falls than their counterparts.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z