Sentences with phrase «than enough chances»

Of course, his fearlessly assured, haunting performance as an emotionally scarred teenage prostitute in Gregg Araki's «Mysterious Skin» remains his career high thus far — but with names like Christopher Nolan in his Rolodex, he's going to have more than enough chances to improve on it.

I was lucky enough that my table only had two other journos at it, so we all got more than enough chances to ask questions that actually interested us.

With two of their best attackers off the pitch, the Sounders struggled with the final ball, despite creating more than enough chances.

With four Premier League matches and a two - legged Champions League semifinal to come, Salah has more than enough chances to set a new milestone having already made the most prolific debut for the club.

«We had more than enough chances to score the goals and get a result here and that is the disappointing thing.

They were somewhat unlucky to lose at Stamford Bridge after creating more than enough chances to take at least a point off Chelsea but they were out - of - sorts away at Stoke, going 3 - 0 down before half - time.

Real Madrid are holding an advantage in this epic duel, but there should be a fightback to come from PSG who had more than enough chances in the first leg to get themselves in front.

That was a wide - open game and the Blues created more than enough chances to win it, Alvaro Morata missing three one - on - one chances in the fixture.

They've had more than enough chances to impress, but failed to do so.

I think he has been given more than enough chances...

You had more than enough chances mate, and no matter how many you got you still looked like a chicken that had just had it's head cut off!

In my opinion Ox has had more than enough chances to prove himself and although injures have no doubt hindered his progress, his statistical return for a player who is no longer considered a youth prospect, are just simply awful for a player in his position.

Furthermore, olivier G - round has been given more than enough chance to save his sloggish reputation.

Those chances add up to more than enough chance to apply the precautionary principle.

Not exact matches

If you're willing to work hard, persevere, and take a chance on yourself, who you are is more than enough.

Chances are you're more concerned than ever about whether you'll have enough to retire.

Other economists don't agree that you need $ 350,000 to be considered rich, however an amount of money that exceeds $ 200,000 per year is enough for a family to lead a more than comfortable lifestyle; this means having the chance to live in a big house, send the kids to private schools, have enough money to travel internationally, own at least 2 cars, and have no debt except a mortgage which will help them build equity.

That can be more than enough to wipe out any chance of a rebalancing bonus.

Chances are, when you feel jealous of your friend's opportunity, job or vacation, what you're really feeling is fear — fear that you aren't good enough, that they're more valuable than you are, that you're somehow missing out.

-- it's OK if the girl is older than 9 and likely to be able to conceive (with apologies for perhaps being offensive: «old enough to bleed, old enough to breed»)-- it's OK if the girl says it's OK (and what are the chances an indoctrinated child is going to say No!?)

Trump's chosen intercessor is therefore a beautiful microcosm of America, the land where showbiz is more important than real life and where everyone gets a second, third, fourth, etc. chance — as long as they have enough money and the right friends.

I get only one chance to do this right, and I've made more than enough mistakes in my life that I can never make up for them and it pains me daily.

In a world built up by chance, God would no more be responsible for the success of his «offspring» than a father whose children got fed and dressed because they were lucky enough to find scraps of food and clothing in the neighbors» trash bins.

I don't yet know enough about the different kinds of cocoa powder to make any definitive statements on what kind might be better than another, but my natural inclination would be to purchase an organic powder if given the chance.

+ wenger out is more than just lack of spending; its not studying the opposition, not rotating players, not addressing why we have so much more injuries than others, not subbing early enough to give incoming players a chance to influence the game, not playing players in their best positions. . . .

You are spot on on Perez being better than ozil if he's given the chance, but neither of them are at wilshere's level when fit Wilshere is aggressive, you can't get the ball off him unless you foul him which gives us enough set pieces, he's a big game player, watch our games against Bayern, barca, Chelsea, man city, man utd e.t.c when he plays, he creates more chances You just need to watch his games even at Bournemouth against Chelsea, which brings me back to the point that, no coach will ever play ozil while Wilshere is fit except wenger............ Plus, ozil is a pu ** y or a weakling rather

The former Southampton youth product will now have the chance to hit the ground running for Everton, who are said to have completed his arrival for a # 20 Million, and he should more than fit and fresh enough to get going straight away for his new team.

Wonder what you lots would be saying if we have bought fabregas and chelsea got ozil with costa in front.and to all «if chelsea win the bpl, its cos of fabregas» announcers here, i say if chelsea win the league its cos of their whole team and most importantly costa.the thing that prevented them from winning it last season was lack of a proper striker like costa which jose testified to and not because they did nt create enough scoring chances (they created more scoring chances than us last season).

He's done more than enough during his time at his current club, and with Reading's relegation, this seems like the best chance for West Ham to grab the Irishman.

Like to see AMN and Willock get some chances as has shown enough to me to believe they are better than FC....

«The performance at Stoke was much better than the result, because we had enough chances and opportunities, but we couldn't find the final pass or finish moves off.

hehe well u r the one who is delusional talking about arsenal is in ur bloods well for us arsenal is our blood.whats this with wenger support if its top four that u guys value so much and hve made it more appealing than a epl title wow shame on of all us see what we hve turned aarsenal into.THIS IS ARSENAL.the moment someone becomes bigger than a club then no way are things okay.ill end with asking my question which has not been answered yet... do u believe wenger will win title with arsenal nxt yeat (epl), do u believe we will be among the strong contenders for the title untill the end when it matters most???? wenger is a smart guy he knows nxt season automatic arsenal will be struggling even for fourth so that is our target and its a shame we fans r ready to waste another year.I am done with this saga we will find out soon enough and I hope and pray we don't regret giving this so called legend another chance coz I hve screamed, cried, and pple dare call pple who want change not arsenal fans or not die hards.cheers guys seems top four is safe our annual top fourbparade is in place

Wenger has always aimed to get in creative midfielders and there is no doubt that we have more than enough of quality in those positions, but is there any chance of Jack supplanting any of his competitors unless we have another wave of injuries?

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Bendtner or Chamakh would still have been considered average even if they scored 25goals because they had average talent.For all the potential Bendtner had he never maximised it so as long asit wasn't developed he's still average.I mean it's possoble for an average player to score 25 goals when given the chances and possible for a world class striker to score less than that.Quality is a talent which may be linked to stats but does not necessarily show on stats.Take Ox for example, if you looked at his stats you might think he's average but he's not.Look at Lukaku, he's scored many goals for Everton yetmany people here think he's not gpod enough for Arsenal because they look at the quality and talent andnot just the goals.

I think it is fair enough for wenger to fight and give more chances to these players than buying a player who left us for his «boyhood» club at our most fragile time when he was holding the honourable, mighty captain's arm band..

Players scores Chech 8.5 top saves when needed Monreal 7 good steady game as always Mert 6 did ok The boss 6 looked tired Bel 7.5 good game needs work on crossing Walcot 5 did less than iwobi Cmpbell 7.5 worked hard, in front of ox and walcott anyway Flamini 7 steady Ox 4 poor all game not a clue how he gets a game Ramsey 5 very selfish player, if barca pay 50m take it and sigh Barkley for 35 Giroud 6.5 missed very good chance and doesn't hold the ball up at important times but had an ok performance Iwobi 7 did more than walcott in 15 mins Chambers not on long enough

At this point, we've lost chances of finishing top 2, anything lower than that is not good enough.

He reckons we have more than enough for a good run in the Europa League as well as a strong League campaign and a good chance of a top four spot, so should more Arsenal fans be as positive as Robbie Fowler and start getting behind our Arsenal?

Funny enough, even though there are less teams, I think a small market team has a better chance of winning the world series than a non-P5 does the national championship.

This and the fact that we HAVE actually tried him as a DM more than one occasion, and it didn't work out well, is reason enough not to chance it.

REMY IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR ARSENAL!!!!!!!!! 6 weeks ago no one wanted him, If that is all we have coming in this transfer window god help us, We are still way behind man city and chelsea and i see people every day saying we can win the EPL, not a chance with the team we have, we are not that much stronger than last year, we need 2/3 more top players no more wingers or 4 foot midgets please

Let me not also remind you of his chance in front of goal (why he was there don't know but he saw a decent opening when we needed to press) he had more than enough time and space to head the ball instead of that stupid flick.

And after Ospina did get some game time with an injury to Cech last year, the decision to keep him at the club rather than Szczesny could be just what he needs to make him feel wanted enough to wait for his chances without getting too frustrated.

I've had enough of this crap, look I honesty do think giroud is a good striker and he is a fairly consistant goal scorer, and every time he played for arsenal he gave 100 percent and I think we all appreciated the way he was, a true professional, but to say we as fans were too critical of him or that he didn't have enough of a chance at arsenal is just absolute bullshit, first of all he has scored more headed goals than any other player in the prem since he arrived in 2012 so we did play to his strengths and he was our main striker for four long years and every pundit on sky and motd has at one point said Giroud is not enough for arsenal to win the title ect, but, now we have sold him he is apparently the best thing since sliced bread and the best buy of the transfer window blah blah fuc * # * g blah.

I feel like 1 - 1 would be a great result, but I have a feeling we will end up losing 2 - 1, which will leave us more than enough of a chance to reach the next stage.

Telling me players are not to blame is absolutely rubbish, they are to blame, yes Monaco mission was to relax and repell Arsenal and if possible shut them down completely, this gam was ours to take, First the pressure was on Monaco, they didn't know how to go about it, whether to defend their 3 - 1 advantage or press us, we had more than enough clear cut chances but as usual we were clueless in front of goal, we tried to open them apart which is impossible, Carzolla and Alexis played as if we lead 15 - 0, holding balls, try to dribble every time they have the ball and and reduce the pace and any chance of other to get through, losing balls carelessly, poor crosses is now our style, it doesn't threatened even Charlton athletic coz everyone now knows our crosses is poorly delivered and our attackers also don't have a clue how to do it even if one get through it will be wasted, this game should have been won by range attempts which was only tried once by ÖZIL and was blocked.

GOONSTER Yes your right we did have some great players in the past and why not now??? If you think we could win the legue with this squad with NO striker then your deluded I'm hoping that AW will buy quality striker and more otherwise our hopes of wining the legue is almost impossible and as for CL no chance but all it takes is to buy couple of more right players we have more than enough funds in the bank so why why why not????? Is it because if Arsen buys quality players then there is no exuse for not wining trophies, I still belive in Wanger but I think his scared of controlling world class players so he goes for neede players or with injury history.

There's a reason why we created so many chances against Stoke, «Theo,» though he was not ruthless enough to put more than one away, Giroud is no better at that either.

It isn't enough to just claim a school like Elk Grove is better than a school like Serra - San Mateo because chances are they have a common opponent or two.