Sentences with phrase «than evolution does»

Not exact matches

We stand at the beginning of the next evolution of marketing — one that has more in common with the past than it does the present.

«In our evolution as investors, one of the things we have discovered is that it is often the things that don't get measured that have a greater magnitude on investment returns than what is measured.

Just my opinion that the evolution debate on behalf of churches does more harm than good for the congregation.

Just because the universe appears ancient, doesn't mean than evolution had time to create the diversity of species it says occurred.

I personally feel that the theory of evolution has just as many questions, if not more, than my faith does.

= > I cant puzzle out what you're trying to say with «this question has nothing to do with evolution other than it the most cosmetic sense that dna worked because it everything else didn't.»

However, this question has nothing to do with evolution other than it the most cosmetic sense that dna worked because it everything else didn't.

Yet, how did these «kinds» produce observable biodiversity in only ~ 4000 yrs, well, they won't state it as such, but creationists require «hyper - evolution,» that is a rate of evolution far faster than evolutionists themselves believe is possible.

This article implies that you can not believe in atoms and the wonder of evolution without being atheist or non-Christian, which is simply not true (I feel more theistic in a biochem class than I do talking to close - minded «Christian» creationist idiots, interestingly enough for the same reasons the author does).

Sounds like that might have something more to do with the theory of evolution than business.

We realize at the end that social policy can do no better (though it can do far worse) than provide conditions that will facilitate the evolution of the circumstances we wish to create.

You likely deny evolution and global warming for no other reason than it makes you uncomfortable and hold science to the impossibly high standard of having to explain every conceivable mystery about the natural World before you will accept it, but some moron at a pulpit doing magic hand signals of a Sundaymorning is enough to convince you he is communicating with some sky - god and turning grocery store bread and wine into flesh and blood.

Scientists don't have all the answers on cosmology and evolution, but they certainly have more accurate information than what is included in the bible.

Bottom line, evolution explains the evidence better than anything else does.

Evolution has more holes than cheese, when you ask questions like, how did this happen in spite of the laws of physics, the answer is I do not know.

The theory of evolution does not explain why there is something rather than nothing.

Rather than attacking with your talking points, fed to you by people adamantly opposed to evolution, why don't you sit down with a book by an expert who LIKES evolution and read their perspective?

One article suggesting that evolution would take 10 - 15x longer than the existence of the universe does not really * prove * anything.

Many accounts from the evolution based accounts of this picture did also happen as well but all these things did so at a much more rapid pace than anyone realizes and in some instances even thousands of times faster.

Furthermore, there is VASTLY more to the Berkeley evolution site than what you are suggesting, so do give it a read.

Why do some people continue to insist that the creation story in the Bible is more scientifically plausible than all the evidence pointing to evolution?

It actually takes more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe in a verifiable God.

Topher, AGAIN, how do you say there's no science behind evolution when scientists who are much more qualified than you consider evolution to be obvious?

We have more evidence for the theory of evolution than we do for the theory of gravity, but I don't see you guys trying to get gravity out of the class room.

I don't know if you're a disbeliever in evolution, but there's almost no better comparison to capitalism than biological evolution.

I do not see anyone other than you even talk about big bang theory and now you accuse someone else of not knowing it from evolution.

What I'm really going to do is to rid the gene pool of its 10,000 worst contributors, in an effort to speed up the evolution of the human race (yes: I made the system automatic, so that I didn't have to bother diddling with it at every moment: Darwin was right, but the process turned out slower than I expected, and I got bored, hence the urge to speed things up a tad).

@Hez - according to a recent Gallup poll, 42 % of Americans do indeed believe the young earth theory, and do not accept either evolution or that the earth is older than 10,000 years.

Nick Spencer, research director of the Theos think tank and author of The Evolution of the West (SPCK) argues that it is, and that it is a mistake to take the universalist message of the gospel — the good news is for everyone — as invalidation of all identifiers other than being a Christian: «I think that's problematic because it takes the universalist notion of Christianity without also taking the incarnational notion of Christianity which is local and which does have specific identities.

If you are really able to do more than «chip away» at cosmology and evolution, then provide a superior explanation of «divine orchestration» in at least same the level of detail as natural processes you are calling inadequate.

«Theistic evolution» is possible when you have a definition of God where you insist that he had a hand in things even though there isn't any evidence that he did, and even when his involvement would complicate things more than a simple, natural explanation.

Matthew knew what John knew — John did not have a higher evolution of understanding of who Jesus claimed to be than the other apostles — it is just in the wisdom of God as He used each writer to convey understanding to the folks who received the letters and for our benefit in the ages to come that Matthew focuses on different things than John.

For by this theory, if a real power of love does not arise at the heart of Evolution, stronger than all individual egotisms and passions, how can the Noosphere ever be stabilized?

You see people who try and disprove God are only tickling your ears they don't have solid evidence only their words and their equations of age using carbon dating if you actually look up whats involved in carbon dating you will see that it's the same as flipping a coin the fossil record has many many holes in it more than most people who believe in evolution will admit.

There's a difference at laughing at actual science (evolution, atheist articles) than laughing at how easy Christians are manipulated, how they don't truly know what they believe, instead they just believe what their parents and churches tell them to think.

According to evolution things are made by themselves things just happen by chance to say that evolution knew than humans would need to eat to survive suggests that something would have to know this are they considering evolution is a thinking force that knows what a creature needs to do to adapt ti certain things or that evolution knew that spiders needed to make webs to catch flies?

My parents, who, though we don't always agree on all the political or theological details, have modeled Christian compassion and grace better than anyone I know and who have supported me through every «evolution» of faith

You do not sound like an uneducated person, use your intellect to look at the evidence for evolution... you will find it is far more satisfying than just assigning things that appear complicated to a god.

The programs taught me about (1) admitting I was beat, (2) coming to believe in something greater than myself (eventually a higher power)(many evolutions and concepts of HP, all of these at one time or another: nature, the 12 steps, creator, Love, spiritual principles)(Step 3) applying my low self worth and gigantic Ego to these spiritual principles (4) write down my liabilities and assets (5) share them with another and my higher power (6 & 7) ask for the liabilites to be removed and be patient with the process (8) Make a list of all that were harmed by me (9) make amends to such folks except whn to do so would injure them or myself (10) take a daily inventory of my day, checking for snafus, mean temperment, arrogance etc (11) meditation and prayer to communicate to my higher power and quiet reflection to listen for the Truth (12) after having a spiritual awakening as a result of working these steps, help others if they wish for help because now I am in the position to assist.

But it is here, in my view, that the importance becomes manifest of an intuitive notion which, timidly evolved less than fifty years ago by a small group of human minds, is now beginning to pervade twentieth century thought as rapidly as did the idea of evolution in the nineteenth century.

Chad, do yourself the disfavor of continuing to argue the stupidity that you do that does more harm to your position and the position of creationists than it does to the theory of evolution that you claim to be against.

The vast majority of people who are educated beyond the level of high school know that evolution is far more reasonable and has more evidence to support it than do creationism or intelligent design.

The future multi-billion year collapse of the universe has no more to do with the Revelation mythology than does the multi-billion year evolution of the universe have to do with the Genesis mythology.

While I do not believe that Genesis 1 speaks directly against the theory of evolution, I do believe that the theology behind the theory of evolution has been around a lot longer than the theory itself, and Genesis 1:24 - 25 speaks directly against some of these theological ideas.

I don't want to give my whole creation / evolution backstory here (although I may do that in another post), but I can't imagine that the Creation Museum could have a more receptive «unbeliever» (in their particular story, at least) than me.

By this we do not mean just the temporal development that historical criticism discerns in the redaction of these codes, the evolution of moral ideas that may be traced out from the first Decalogue to the Law of the Covenant, on the one hand, and from the Decalogue itself through the restatements and amplifications of the book of Deuteronomy to the new synthesis of the «Holiness Code» in the book of Leviticus and the legislation subsequent to Ezra, on the other; more important than this development of the content of the Law is the transformation in the relationship between the faithful believer and the Law.

For this reason I have realized this: a chimpanzee does not understand math (regardless of how many hours I spent trying to teach them this) because of it's anatomy, yet I do understand math because of my anatomy (and education of course), I as a mere mortal (unlike yourself) know that my faculties must be somehow limited and that there are concepts that no matter how much I try to use my retarded brain I will never understand them because I don't have the god lobe in the ole brain like you do, none the less I keep on thinkin» in a finite fashion hoping that my future children might have a little more range than I since they too will be a «tarded snapshot in a timeline of cognitive evolution.

Quantum Mechanics is WAY weirder and more complex than, say, evolution (though I like how you threw the big bang in there — separate theories, dude), but you won't really hear any religious nuts complaining about the exact same process that gives us QM because it doesn't conflict with their ancient mythology.

The evolution of such resistance does not cause the organism to be more intrinsically virulent than strains of Staphylococcus aureus that have no antibiotic resistance, but resistance does make MRSA infection more difficult to treat with standard types of antibiotics and thus more dangerous.

Don't get me wrong, there are people that I was suprised to find dismiss evolution and believe the earth to be less than 10k years old, but they certainly don't make up enough votes to justify making yourself look foolish.