Not exact matches
The
fossil fuel divestment campaign began on university campuses in 2011 but the new report reveals that concerns over investments in coal, oil and gas have now entered the financial mainstream,
with more
than 80 % of the funds now committed to divest being managed by commercial investment and pension funds.
In the U.S., the cost of solar energy is now about on par
with — and in some cases, cheaper
than — energy from
fossil fuels.
With economies of scale the cost of solar power has plunged much faster
than many people expected — and some are actually arguing that solar will become cheaper
than fossil fuels within the next few years.
Making Solar Cheaper
Than Fossil Fuels In the long run, all this wrangling
with utilities won't do Rive much good if he can't beat them on price.
As he stated flatly in an exclusive interview
with Fortune: «The core mission of the company is selling clean energy at a lower cost
than fossil fuels.
Today the company works
with a bio - and
fossil -
fuel blend, which Shepherd insists is still kinder to the environment
than importing salt from overseas.
Investment in clean energy set a new record last year,
with more money invested globally in new renewable power
than in new power from
fossil fuels.
``... to wean our economy off its overreliance on high - cost carbon
fuels...» And how do you propose to do this
with fossil fuels representing more
than 80 % of the energy budget?
And
with clean energy investment globally hitting a record - breaking US$ 367 billion last year — nearly 50 per cent more
than was invested in
fossil -
fuelled electricity — it's a great time to buy into this particular market.
That might explain why the
fossil record is much more consistent
with progressive creation
than it is
with neo-Darwinian evolution, or why
fossils and
fossil fuels have detectable carbon 14 when they should have absolutely none.
Industrialized countries
with less
than a quarter of the world's population are responsible for about three - quarters of the carbon dioxide released by burning
fossil fuels.
For a
fossil fuel - driven vanity project
with more money
than Scrooge McDuck and ambitions of global domination, Manchester City have got a surprising number of quite likeable footballers.
It is no coincidence that the citizens of Arab countries
with limited
fossil fuel reserves have enjoyed greater freedom over the years
than their oil - rich neighbours.
Moving forward
with a campaign pledge to unravel former President Obama's sweeping plan to curb global warming, Trump today is set to sign an executive order that will suspend, rescind or flag for review more
than a half - dozen measures in an effort to boost domestic energy production in the form of
fossil fuels.
Having the Belleayre, Gore and Whiteface ski centers join The Climate Reality Project's «I Am Snow 100 %» program is in line
with Cuomo's Clean Energy Standard, which requires that half of all electricity used in New York come from renewable sources, rather
than fossil fuels, by 2030, the governor's office said in a press release.
A 2016 report by energy research firm Corporate Knights estimated that by sticking
with fossil, rather
than clean,
fuels, New York pensioners missed out on roughly $ 5.3 billion in added earnings in 2015.
«What's more, biorefineries have trouble competing
with low oil prices» — since biofuels are two to three times more expensive
than fossil fuels.
There is now adequate empirical evidence available around the world: Wherever people have brought about more efficient use of energy and greater use of renewable energy, you generate many more jobs
than if you were to continue
with conventional technologies and
fossil fuels.
In short, the analysis showed that storing solar energy today offers fewer environmental benefits
than just sending it straight to the grid, because the energy lost to storage inefficiencies is ultimately made up
with fossil -
fuel electricity from the grid.
Amalgamated, a left - leaning bank
with roots in the labor movement that manages more
than $ 40 billion in assets under management, said it would adopt new policies about lowering its exposure to the
fossil fuel industry in its own investments and its loans.
The EIA says world energy consumption is likely to grow by more
than 50 percent over the period 2010 to 2040,
with fossil fuels supplying 80 percent of the total, despite a growth in renewables and nuclear power.
A Columbia University study linked greater proximity to
fossil -
fuel exhaust
with greater learning disabilities in children — making them better candidates for jail
than higher education.
The authors argue that the large emerging economies are clearly
fuelling themselves
with renewables and nuclear as well as, rather
than instead of,
fossil fuels, for various reasons, and that this will not change soon.
Eighty to 167 per cent more greenhouse emissions would be released from 2011 to 2020
than if the EU were to stick
with fossil fuel.
«When it comes to life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, wind and solar energy provide a much better greenhouse gas balance
than fossil - based low carbon technologies, because they do not require additional energy for the production and transport of
fuels, and the technologies themselves can be produced to a large extend
with decarbonized electricity,» states Edgar Hertwich, an industrial ecologist from Yale University who co-authored the study.
CIGS on glass panels can drop that cost to $ 1.50 per watt, Guha says, but he also acknowledges that solar energy will not be able to compete
with fossil fuel — based electricity until it costs less
than $ 1 per watt.
For unsubsidized solar power to be competitive
with coal - or natural gas — powered electricity, it needs to cost $ 1 per watt — today, solar is three to five times more expensive
than fossil fuels, Atwater said.
Hydrogen can also be split from water in high - temperature nuclear reactors or generated from
fossil fuels such as coal or natural gas,
with the resulting carbon dioxide captured and sequestered rather
than released into the atmosphere.
In convincing the public of the dangers of climate change, nothing would be more powerful
than being able to link extreme weather events
with our unbridled love for
fossil fuels.
The People's Republic now produces more
than three billion tons of coal a year, and the
fossil fuel has played a key role in accelerating the nation's growth, along
with its carbon dioxide emissions, dating to the early 20th century
In some ways, energy regulations to curtail
fossil fuel burning may be an easier sell in developing countries
than in the United States, said Rachel Cleetus, senior economist
with the Climate and Energy Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
THE Paris climate agreement, sealed last December, was a first in many respects: the first truly international climate change deal,
with promises from both rich and poor nations to cut emissions; the first global signal that the age of
fossil fuels must end; the first time world leaders said we should aim for less
than 2 °C of warming.
We are never going to go back to having 50 percent of America farming but we definitely need more
than 1 percent of America farming if we're going to do [
with] out vast quantities of
fossil fuel, which we can no longer for many reasons continue to do, and I think that will be altogether healthy, and I think there'll be lots of people who will enjoy it immensely.
But calculating the costs associated
with premature death caused by air pollution is complex and has resulted in very different estimates: because of the different methodologies used, the cost of air pollution related to
fossil fuel consumption is estimated to be three times higher in the US
than the EU.
The shift back to
fossil fuels, combined
with rapid growth in the number of cars on the roads (see «
Fuelling Brazil's transport boom»), has worsened city smog and caused emissions in the transport sector to spike at about 170 million tons of CO2 in 2011, up from less
than 140 million tons in 2008.
I mentioned this to executives at Exxon before it was Exxon Mobile many times back in the 1990s when I was working
with you all that if you were an energy company rather
than a
fossil fuel extraction company you could be part of the future instead of part of the past.
Nevertheless, «it's still better to heat
with wood
than to burn
fossil fuels,» says Cherubini.
As a result one long - standing criticism of renewable energy may no longer apply, namely that mandating increased use of renewable energy for electricity generation will be more costly in the long run
than sticking
with fossil fuel energy.
In a letter being delivered to the White House on Thursday, nearly 400 scientists from more
than a dozen countries are urging President Obama to stop future oil and gas drilling in the Arctic Ocean because of the significant environmental and climate risks associated
with further
fossil fuels exploration there.
Third,
with our ∼ 1 °C scenario it is more likely that the biosphere and soil will be able to sequester a substantial portion of the anthropogenic
fossil fuel CO2 carbon
than in the case of 2 °C or more global warming.
Air and water pollution from
fossil fuel extraction and use have high costs in human health, food production, and natural ecosystems, killing more
than 1,000,000 people per year and affecting the health of billions of people [232], [234],
with costs borne by the public.
That is true, but both goals, extracting 100 GtC from the atmosphere via improved forestry and agricultural practices (
with possibly some assistance from CCS technology) and limiting additional net change of non-CO2 forcings to zero, are feasible and probably much easier
than the principal task of limiting additional
fossil fuel emissions to 130 GtC.
Let's discuss: Investors
with a time horizon of more
than 5 years should avoid
fossil fuel - related companies, mutual funds, and ETFs.
For example, we have replaced more
than 60 percent of our
fossil fuel requirements in our manufacturing process
with renewable energy sources.
I would dare humanity to live in a world where are the
fossil fuel energy is instead produced by nuclear power: our «date
with destiny» would be just around the corner; in less
than geologic time.
I agree
with SA that, once the transition is well advanced, there's no reason why energy from renewable sources has to cost more
than energy from
fossil fuels, when all costs are counted.
All it demonstrates is that there is more
than one causal factor, as is well known,
with aerosols (from
fossil fuels and volcanoes), land - use changes (through affecting CH$ and CO2 levels and albedo) and solar irradiance all playing a role.
In the meantime, the world's poorest two or three billion people, emitting less
than one ton of carbon dioxide per person per year (compared to the 20 tons per - capita average of the United States), could be propelled out of poverty
with additional
fossil fuel use without substantially interfering
with efforts to rein in the richest populations» emissions.
McCain is far more honest
than any leading Republican in this regard, but his party is of course joined at the hip
with fossil fuel interests.
One article I was recently reading stated that hemp seed oil produces a cleaner buring
fuel (nearly 90 % burn,
with considerably less ash and CO2 production)
than any
fossil fuel (33 % burn at the most efficient)