They think that they own god, rather
than god owns all of us.
Not exact matches
Those put into question your belief in the characteristics of the
god, perhaps even the existence of the
god itself, but it is still more comforting to assume something more powerful
than yourself has your best interests in mind vs. the idea that we are left to our
own devices — especially when you are surrounded by people that agree with and reinforce that idea and shun you when you do not agree with it.
But I believe
God is so much bigger
than something I may say that is not quite right as I walk out my
own personal spiritual journey.
It means
God is not dependent on a nature other
than himself, because he is identical with his
own nature.
For me as a Calvinist, that suggests that rather
than spending a lot of time defending the doctrine of total depravity or of election I would do best to share my deeply felt sense of my
own unworthiness, and to point people to the way in which I have experienced
God's gracious workings in my life.
Could submitting ourselves fully to
God's power over us rather
than relying on our
own skills and perceived gifts be the key that unlocks the door to discernment?
In other words, «Rather
than consider the wisdom and authority of
God, I'll be my
own ultimate authority.»
You are supposed to love this
god more
than your
own family!
The church is not authorized to represent the reign of
God, his justice and peace, in any other way
than that in which Jesus represented it, namely by being partners with him in challenging the powers of evil and bearing in its
own life the cost of the challenge.
It is as if they place their faith in their faith (which is scarier
than placing it on our
own efforts) and not on
God.
When we give in to this need for self exaltation, and organize others around our cause, then we recognize it as the warped type of social engineering you describe, where the goal is uniformity, not unity — promoting our
own agenda, rather
than participating in
God's mission.
The human desire to be perfect means we push
God to the side, opting to tap into our
own limited power resources rather
than drawing from the fountain of life.
these extremists are perverting
God to thier
own means rather
than actually following his teachings.
Worse
than that, the apostles made us worship Jesus - who in reality was punished by
God for his
own wrongdoing!
I am happy that the writer had the choices that she did... She is also free to decide whether or not she is a Catholic... She however, took an available medication for a health problem... most Catholic facilities recognize such health problems and allow for that treatment... I am completly puzzled, though, that she would not want other Catholics to be able to choose differently
than she did... for those people who wish to use contraceptive services and medication, options are open to them... I am not Catholic, did not grow up in a faith based family, and don't know whether a
God exists or not... However, to leave a relgious group with no option but to contradict its
own tenets is an attempt by those who don't believe in those tenents to mock them, certainly, but more to erode them... this seems the aim of many and when those folks operate from inside the government... that intrusion is an overreach of the govenrment...
His «formal exposition of the concept of
God's self - communication» in terms of four pairs of interrelated concepts, that is, (a) Origin - Future; (b) History - Transcendence; (c) Invitation - Acceptance; (d) Knowledge - Love, by his
own admission is more a brief sketch
than a full - scale presentation of a new interpersonal understanding of the
God - world relationship.
Philippians 3:8,9 «More
than that, I count all things to be loss in view of the surpassing value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them but rubbish so that I may gain Christ, and may be found in Him, not having a righteousness of my
own derived from the Law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which comes from
God on the basis of faith,»
You say you will never see if you don't take your hands off your eyes and yet refuse to look at the world from any other perspective
than your
own Hebrew
God derived universe and you will make or accept any excuse that allows you to keep believing you are right.
The effect of such radically transformative grace, according to the Augustinian tradition and the young Luther, is that the heart loves
God above all things for His
own sake; in Augustine's terms, we come to enjoy
God and use created things for
God's sake, rather
than attempting to «use»
God for the sake of created enjoyments.
When I talk to
God in prayer, I am talking to something deep within the fabric of my
own being and asking for a better way, a better idea, and intuitive thought rather
than to have some trivial thing of substance delivered to me on a platter.
But, we've got more missionaries coming into America from Korea and all other parts of the world because they're seeing more of
God in their
own country
than they are here.
Like all idolaters, we have so deified our culture - forming abilities that we believe we can shape our world in ways subject only to our
own desires, rather
than to the norms
God has built into his creation.
Bible: Deuteronomy «Kill any friends or family that worship a
god that is different
than your
own.»
If everyone agreed to contribute by their
own sweat to the gain of the rest of the world rather
than standing at the altar lecturing how
God will show us «non-believers» rapture, suffering and pain is then worth wondering at that moment, how many other faiths at that moment are saying their
God will do the same to you?
Well, it seems to me that you're interpreting the Bible for your
own reasons rather
than in terms of
God's will.
When we lose faith in the essential goodness of life and our
own humanity, seeing that which we judge «evil» to be more prevalent
than that which we judge to be «good», then we have lost faith in either the goodness or the power of
God to sustain that goodness and our God has become too small or just another Baal, a false god of our own vain imaginings, a projection of our own finite limitations and disordered desir
God to sustain that goodness and our
God has become too small or just another Baal, a false god of our own vain imaginings, a projection of our own finite limitations and disordered desir
God has become too small or just another Baal, a false
god of our own vain imaginings, a projection of our own finite limitations and disordered desir
god of our
own vain imaginings, a projection of our
own finite limitations and disordered desires.
To exclude violence completely, especially from
God's expressions of love, would be to make his care for us less passionate
than our
own parents, who disapline us for our
own good, and protect us as needs be.
For
God would be less
than perfect — that is to say, less
than God — if either his holiness or his love had come into being at a certain point within
God's
own divine life.
I think his inability to take accountability for his
own life and destiny (rather
than «placing it in
god's hands») has a lot to do with what he has «lost.»
Over a little more
than 2000 years man has developed his
own idea of a religion that he claims pleases the
God represented by the Bible.
If the church would encourage it's members to be charitable on their
own, then they could be giving glory to
God, rather
than letting the Federal Government get it for their taxation and redistribution.
Jesus» original disciples likely never thought of him as anything more
than a great rabbi, and some might have thought him a good rallying point for a revolt, they could have even whispered that he was anointed by
God, but the idea of his being divine only seems to enter into the gospels around the time many Greek educated folks had converted, bringing their
own views of what a «son of
God» means into the faith.
I grew up with more faith in
God than I do have in people, even people in my
own Church!
At first glance it might seem appealing to argue that the mystery of
God outstrips our capacity to delineate it, that every theology in its
own way must fall so short of the truth that no position can, however seriously maintained, be markedly any more or less true
than any other.
Lower beings exist for the sake of the higher — grass for cows, cows for hungry humans — however, men and women exist for no other reason
than God's
own delight.
No, it is something that happens as a result of choosing our
own way rather
than God's.
Then why do we believe that
God, who we say is infinitely more loving
than we are, could do that to
God's
own children?
Lamenting that there was almost any amusement he would rather take up
than dwelling on
God he cried out «Give me grace, my Father to be utterly ashamed of my
own reluctance.»
But more
than just pray for them, and more
than just believe that
God will give them food and clothes, why don't you actually be an answer to your
own prayers and your
own faith, and give them food and clothes!?
Cain becomes angry when
God accepts Abel's sacrifice rather
than his
own (Gen 4:5), and after he kills Abel, claims that it is not he who is supposed to take care of Abel, that he is not his brother's keeper (Gen 4:9).
This full view of
God lifts up a
God who is more
than a Creator who made the world out of nothing, more
than the
God of the big - bang theory who began the universe and then left it to run on its
own -
There can be no better work for us
than — in our
own way, in our
own place — to testify to the fact that
God rules the world; nations do not.
To think that my patient, kind, and tender father who loves
God and people more
than anyone I know, served as a supportive deacon to these scumbags, and began to question his
own observations when they put their spin on the situations... SICKENS ME.
Wright criticizes Reformers for failing to stress «the great narrative of
God, Israel, Jesus, and the world, coming forward into our
own day and looking ahead to the eventual renewal of all things» so that their readings of the gospels «show little awareness of them as anything other
than repositories of dominical teaching, concluding with the saving events of Good Friday and Easter but without integrating those events into the Kingdom - proclamation that preceded them.»
Much better to say there is no
God or, as Abraham Lincoln did, «The Almighty has his
own purposes,»
than to flatter ourselves with knowing what those purposes are.
Examples are common enough — individuals and congregations whose vision is no bigger
than their
own interests, whose personal agendas have displaced
God's bigger, scarier and less manageable purposes.
Rather
than insisting that scripture make the doctrine of the Trinity explicit, perhaps we should allow the Trinity to remain implicit and affirm it out of our
own experience, our
own living with
God.
In order to truly know that there is no
God, or believe it as true (as vehemently as some Atheists do, verily defining a religion of its
own), an Atheist has to know a lot more
than all of the rest of us on this world.
And once this recognition is at the heart of our ministry, our preaching will become effectual — not that we are ever more
than unworthy and «unprofitable» servants, but that
God in Christ can and does use our unworthiness for his
own great ends and makes even our imperfections to serve him.
And even if there is generally an improved understanding of
God, to say that this is because of a progressive divine revelation rather
than because of our
own increased understanding through the years is tantamount to saying that our earlier ignorance is
God's fault for not revealing more sooner, It hardly seems necessary to blame human ignorance on a divine coyness, or to picture
God rationing out carefully increased doses of self - revelation.