Not exact matches
outstanding warrants to
purchase shares of our common stock, including our Related - Party Warrants, either (i) would be exchanged for shares of our common stock depending in part on the initial public offering
price of this offering, (ii) would be exercised to the extent the exercise
price per share provided for therein is less
than the initial public offering
price of this offering or (iii) would expire or
otherwise be cancelled; and
our currently outstanding warrants to
purchase shares of our common stock, including our Related - Party Warrants, either (i) would be exchanged for shares of our common stock depending in part on the initial public offering
price of this offering, (ii) would be exercised to the extent the exercise
price per share provided for therein is less
than the initial public offering
price of this offering or (iii) would expire or
otherwise be cancelled; and
With a bit of discretion you'll be able to discard the shrunken, stained, faded and
otherwise undesirable items, and those that are deemed worthy of
purchase will typically be name brands bought at
prices as low as (or even lower
than) 5 % of the original
purchase price.
I believe that their
price point for ebooks is aimed towards the fact that ease of
purchase on the kindle tends to make kindle owners buy more books
than they would
otherwise IF those books are safely below a comfort threshold.
They are reducing the amount of their electric bill that is exposed to cost - per - kWh fluctuations from the regional utility, and building that security into the
purchase price of their new home should give them peace of mind rather
than otherwise.
«If the deposit or the
purchase price is faked by an artificial value increase, which is not substantiated by the market and if it's a fake flip, then the lender is advancing more money
than they
otherwise would because they're basing it on an artificially inflated value.»
Since this skips the centralized storefronts (which take a cut of the
purchase price), the
price is often lower
than it
otherwise would be.
Note in reality I am likely underselling the «cash flow» of the class A property because to produce 1.3 X on an assumed much higher
purchase price it would produce better
than the same «cash flow» as the C property (
otherwise it would not have achieved 1.3 X).