Homebirth is safe or safer
than hospital birth because when you exlude women who midwives shouldn't have taken at all and those who doctors and real miwives couldn't save after homebirth clowns botched deliveries — well, it totally works!
Not exact matches
I have to first admit that I've been a little reticent to post about this, not
because I'm not excited about it, but
because homebirth in our culture is not seen as a safe or wise choice (though in reality it is as safe or safer
than hospital births in most cases — there are a number of studies that indicate as such).
Another lengthy scan with very little discussion between the technician and us, again our worrying about our being steamrolled into a management plan without through evaluation of the risks and benefits, or being essentially pushed into a
hospital birth because it would be best for the baby but also mean that I would not have the option of birthing vaginally was all a little more
than my tear ducts could bear.
And most of all,
because there are NO guarantees, one way or the other - the numbers on safety and well being with home
births are better
than those in the
hospital.
while being coerced to push even though I wanted to breath the babies down, I didn't get to see them at all for 15 hours after they were born
because the
hospital staff didn't get their act together, not
because it was medically necessary, etc., so much so that the head of OB (my office doc) later admitted they had me on suicide watch
because what happened was so different
than my
birth plan... I wasn't stuck on exact details, especially
because twins throw a loop in all of it, but it was nothing like I had hoped for, at all.
Home
Birth on the Rise by a Dramatic 20 Percent One mother chose home birth because it was cheaper than going to a hosp
Birth on the Rise by a Dramatic 20 Percent One mother chose home
birth because it was cheaper than going to a hosp
birth because it was cheaper
than going to a
hospital.
Birth centers tend to be cheaper
than hospitals not only for the time that mothers spend but
because hospitals use more resources, such as IV line, belly monitors, electricity, pain drugs, etc..
But it wasn't safer
than a
hospital birth, at least not if the definition of safety is was your baby more at risk of dying
because she was born at home.
By the way, a great book by another skeptical OBGYN is called «Born in the USA» only he's skeptical of medicalized
birth because he's a clinical scientist as well, unlike our author here and he's realized that home
birth is safer
than hospital birth according to peer - reviewed large scale studies.
Ericka, there are more cases of infant death in
hospitals only
because hospital birth is so much more common
than out - of -
hospital birth.
The FACT is... more women DO die in
hospital births (from things that could be prevented, or from unnecessary interventions)
than in home
births, and that women were NOT «dying in droves» from home
births back in the day... death during
birth was fairly uncommon until women were forced into dirty
birth centers with doctors knocking them out and delivering their babies without being held to any sanitation standards
because promiscuity was on the rise and we had to keep the «dirty women» separate from the rest of the
hospital.
In other words, I would not conclude that C - SECTION «dramatically decreases»,
because it would seem that MORE babies have brain injuries with c - sections
than hospital births.
Because Amy Tuteur, MD didn't describe the core beliefs of the cult I can't tell whether she means that the beliefs are unfalsifiable (undetectable goodness of vaginal
birth) or whether she means that the cult members are resistant to evidence (home
birth is as safe as or even safer
than hospital birth) which is NOT what unfalsifiable means.
Because many people who want a home
birth believe it's just as safe as
hospital birth if they have a midwife and transport to a
hospital, and given that belief they'd prefer to manage on their own — just like many people prefer to make their own bread without strictly adhering to a belief that the B - vitamins in home - baked bread are somehow better
than the B - vitamins in storebought bread.
Great care was taken to control for pregnancy risk status
because the «intended a
hospital birth» group contained proportionally more «high - risk» pregnancies
than the «intended a home
birth» group, and
because «high - risk» pregnancies were more likely to have PPHs.
«The reason studies consistently show midwifery to be as safe or safer
than hospital births is
because it's about preventive care and good nutrition during pregnancy,» Cornia said.
The incidence of PPH for planned
hospital births would be expected to be higher
than the incidence for planned home
births,
because nulliparous women are more likely to experience PPH (see Table 2), and are also more likely to plan a
hospital birth [28].
Women are choosing Homebirth
because they are told it is safe or safer
than hospital birth.
Personally, I think that
hospital births (even though I do believe women are often forced into interventions that are unnecessary) are on average safer
than homebirths
because of the conditions that can happen all of a sudden, even though some would say those conditions are rare.
If I had to take a guess at why you are distorting the truth to make
hospital births look safer
than they are is
because you are scared.
I am not making the claim that
hospital births are nearly 300 % more dangerous
than home
birth, I am not making this claim
because even though some grouping of numbers taken outside of context supports the statement to make such a claim would be unethical and foolish.
I think that childbirth is safer nowadays
because of the prenatal care that women receive, not so much
because women are giving
birth in
hospitals (even though I am aware that there are problems that come up during delivery, which would make a
hospital birth safer
than, say, a homebirth).
Homebirth is in America as Homebirth in America does, yet the Homebirth advocates who are looking at the actually data are making excuses about the worse outcomes as they speculate that it is either due to the high risks
births that were included, or
because they must have been farther away from the
hospital than just 5 minutes, or just ignoring the outcomes data and focusing on the low intervention data.
This is an important finding
because it helps us interpret the case reports of poor outcomes with water
birth — poor outcomes do occur with water
birth, but they are no more likely to occur with water
birth than with conventional
hospital delivery.
While I don't put much stock in home
birth horror stories as evidence that home
birth is less safe
than hospital (
because I don't know how they compare to the number of
hospital horror stories), I put even LESS stock in «I would have died if I hadn't been in the
hospital» stories.
Because women in Gelderland more often choose home
than hospital birth, only women choosing
hospital birth were recruited in the final four months of the study.
All analyses were based on the planned rather
than the actual place of
birth because referral to
hospital during labour is usually indicative of anticipated or existing problems.
Cobedding of twins and other infants of multiple gestation is a frequent practice, both in the
hospital setting and at home.174 However, the benefits of cobedding twins and higher - order multiples have not been established.175, — , 177 Twins and higher - order multiples are often born prematurely and with low
birth weight, so they are at increased risk of SIDS.101, 102 Furthermore, there is increased potential for overheating and rebreathing while cobedding, and size discordance might increase the risk of accidental suffocation.176 Most cobedded twins are placed on their sides rather
than supine.174 Finally, cobedding of twins and higher - order multiples in the
hospital setting might encourage parents to continue this practice at home.176
Because the evidence for the benefits of cobedding twins and higher - order multiples is not compelling and because of the increased risk of SIDS and suffocation, the AAP believes that it is prudent to provide separate sleep areas for these infants to decrease the risk of SIDS and accidental suffo
Because the evidence for the benefits of cobedding twins and higher - order multiples is not compelling and
because of the increased risk of SIDS and suffocation, the AAP believes that it is prudent to provide separate sleep areas for these infants to decrease the risk of SIDS and accidental suffo
because of the increased risk of SIDS and suffocation, the AAP believes that it is prudent to provide separate sleep areas for these infants to decrease the risk of SIDS and accidental suffocation.
They're worth reading, especially
because you'll see when you do that as of July 10, 2012, the blog had not been updated in more
than six months and that some problems in these heart - wrenching stories actually arose from
hospital, not home
birth, mistakes.
✓
Because home
birth is at least as safe or most likely safer
than hospital birth.
I was at the
hospital less
than an hour before she was born,
because I knew I needed to wait as long as possible before going in to be able to stick to the
birth plan.
✓
Because home
birth is gentler
than hospital birth.
I even chose to go to a
birth center in New Hampshire, rather
than having a home
birth in Massachusetts where I live,
because the laws regarding midwifery are different in New Hampshire and I knew that should I need to transfer to a medical facility, a New Hampshire midwife would get a lot more respect at a New Hampshire
hospital than a Mass. midwife at a Mass.
hospital.
«The results of this study were of particular interest
because more
than half of the pregnant women with migraine experienced some type of adverse
birth outcome, suggesting that these pregnancies should be considered high risk,» said study author Matthew S. Robbins, M.D., director of inpatient services at Montefiore Headache Center, chief of neurology at Jack D. Weiler
Hospital of Montefiore, and associate professor of clinical neurology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
In fact, British regulators are urging women to consider home
birth because home
birth can be safer
than a
hospital birth for many women.
Not only is this unfortunate
because of a lack of people to share experiences / plans with, but the result also is that more time is spent on preparing for a
hospital birth than on the details of what it's like to be preparing for a planned home
birth.