«At the moment the only thing rising faster
than household fuel bills are the profits of the energy companies.»
Not exact matches
That's why analysts expect the government to look for operating expenditure cuts — such as cutting remaining
fuel subsidies — even as it tries to keep up development spending and target lower - income
households, often called the B40, or bottom 40 percent with incomes of less
than around 2,500 ringgit a month.
Gasoline prices up: Americans are expected to spend an average of $ 400 per
household more on
fuel this year
than in 2016, as the rebound in crude prices is reflected in the cost of petrol at the pump.
The donation will go towards a campaign in Uganda aimed at providing more
than 12,000 refugee
households with a grant to change their life by enabling business growth and other opportunities
fueled by investment.
Growth has been
fueled by the growth of
household and foreign debt rather
than by business investment, and we have become dangerously reliant on the resource sector.
Yes,
households are being asked to contribute to the cost of developing green energy — but contrary to the claims of some think tanks and commentators, this will be far less
than the cost of staying hooked on fossil
fuels.
Improving the homes of all low income
households, rather
than «LIHC
fuel poor»,
households is required as it helps overcome the difficulty of «churn» arising from the relative Low Income High Cost (LIHC) definition and make the delivery and targeting of programmes much more straightforward.
The UK
Fuel Poverty Strategy defines a fuel - poor household as one needing to spend more than 10 % of household income to achieve a satisfactory and healthy heating reg
Fuel Poverty Strategy defines a
fuel - poor household as one needing to spend more than 10 % of household income to achieve a satisfactory and healthy heating reg
fuel - poor
household as one needing to spend more
than 10 % of
household income to achieve a satisfactory and healthy heating regime.
The Government has a commitment to eradicate
fuel poverty in all UK
households by 2016, however rising energy prices mean there are now around 1.5 million more
households in
fuel poverty
than there were at this time last year.
3)
Fuel poverty is defined as when a household is required to spend more than ten per cent of its income after housing costs on total fuel
Fuel poverty is defined as when a
household is required to spend more
than ten per cent of its income after housing costs on total
fuel fuel use.
Since 2009 we have allocated over # 500 million on a range of
fuel poverty and energy efficiency programmes, installing more
than 900,000 energy efficiency measures in homes across Scotland - nearly one in three of all
households have received energy efficiency measures.
However, a crucial fact is that only 18 % of
households in receipt of the Winter
Fuel Payment are classified as «fuel poor» - i.e. spending more than 10 % of their income on energy and therefore most likely to struggling to heat their ho
Fuel Payment are classified as «
fuel poor» - i.e. spending more than 10 % of their income on energy and therefore most likely to struggling to heat their ho
fuel poor» - i.e. spending more
than 10 % of their income on energy and therefore most likely to struggling to heat their homes.
To qualify for additional assistance, a
household must meet income eligibility requirements; have exhausted both regular and first emergency benefits during the 2010 - 11 HEAP season; and have a current shut - off notice on either heat or «heat - related» electricity or an oil, propane, wood or other
fuel supply with less
than 1/4 tank remaining.
But in November and December 2005, wind power in Colorado cost less
than electricity from fossil
fuel, and the average
household that switched to wind saved $ 4 a month on its electric bill.
«Turning homes into power stations could cut
household fuel bills by more
than 60 percent.»
And because these varieties can suit most dietary needs or restrictions, vegan protein powders are a smart choice for
households, gyms and dorms where there's more
than one person
fueling up.
Credit -
fueled conspicuous consumption keeps more
households in the red
than mortgages and college loans combined.
Now comes EIA's Winter
Fuels Outlook, with forecasts that
household heating costs will be lower
than the previous two winters.
After all, the critics say, lower - income
households spend a higher percentage of their budgets on energy
than rich ones do, and the price of energy produced from carbon - intensive
fuels is likely to rise.
For example, rooftop solar can now provide electricity to businesses and
households at a lower cost
than fossil
fuels and improvements in vehicle efficiency can easily pay for themselves.
If fossil power is cheap enough that there are only x %
households in
fuel poverty (Wiki: In the UK,
fuel poverty is said to occur when in order to heat its home to an adequate standard of warmth a
household needs to spend more
than 10 % of its income to maintain an adequate heating regime), but the alternative carbon - free power increases the percentage of
households by 10 % there are negative consequences to not using fossil power.
A
household can save between $ 150 - $ 250 a year on
fuel, which goes a long way in Kenya, especially when considering 42 % of our customers exist on less
than $ 2 a day.
It is a recipe for healthy prosperity that will save Marylanders between $ 1.3 billion and $ 7.3 billion a year (2011 dollars) in energy costs in 2050, even after making provisions for (i) assistance for low income
households to pay no more
than 6 percent of income on energy bills, (ii) proactive investments in communities now dependent on fossil -
fuel - related jobs, and (iii) new job creation in underserved areas.
«On average, the richest 20 % of
households in low and middle income countries capture six times more in total
fuel product subsidies (43 %)
than the poorest 20 % of
households (7 %),» the report says.
With drivers today saving more
than $ 550 a year in
fuel costs and
household budgets growing by $ 1,337 due to utility and other energy - related savings in 2015, it should come as no surprise that voters appreciate the positive economic impact of U.S. energy.
We must continue to improve our scientific understanding, particularly of the impacts of climate change; we must implement policies such as raising the market price of carbon to provide incentives to
households to alter their consumption so that they will have a low - carbon diet; we must also raise carbon prices to send a signal to firms like ExxonMobil that their future lies in research, development, and production of low - carbon
fuels; and we must devise mechanisms so that countries will join in a global effort rather
than one limited to northwest Europe.
Households in
fuel poverty are defined as those in which more
than 10 % of income is spent on energy.
And there's no reason to beleive that, given the recent increases in UK energy bills, there are fewer
households in
fuel poverty today
than in 2009.
Estimates for Minnesota show some alarming costs, including gross state product losses of $ 4 â $ «12 billion, average
household income losses ranging between $ 3,400 and $ 8,000 per year, heating,
fuel and electricity costs more
than doubling, and job losses between 33,000 and 74,000.
If this causes
fuel poverty (more
than 10 % of income on energy) then brits only make # 10000 / yr
household income.
It found that
households in the top quintile would pay an on average additional $ 319 per month, directly and indirectly, through higher fossil
fuel prices associated with the carbon fee; that's more
than three times the additional $ 96 per month that
households in the lowest quintile would pay.
At a time when 6.59 million
households in the UK are considered «
fuel poor» (spending more
than 10 % of
household income on heating), paying power companies to burn wood is a disastrous waste of money.
20 % of single parent families in Scotland spend more
than 10 % of their income on
household fuel Scottish Government