A recent study presenting different accident scenarios found that people were less likely to blame an automated car, even when it was at fault,
than a human driver at fault.
The race by automakers and technology firms to develop self - driving cars has been fueled by the belief that computers can operate a vehicle more
safely than human drivers.
For starters, regulators will have to come up with a definition of «safe» — whether that means the machines must drive flawlessly or simply break fewer laws and get into fewer accidents
than human drivers do.
Since current self - driving safety assurances aren't exactly airtight, Koopman argues that self - driving cars should be held to a way higher
standard than human drivers — say, 10 times safer than the average human — before they're given the green light.
A new autonomous Audi RS 7, dubbed «Robby,» recently lapped California's Sonoma Raceway in 2 minutes, 1 second — a time that Audi says is
faster than a human driver managed at the helm of the RS 7.
Additionally, self - driving car technology will be so good that these robotic automobiles will posses driving skills that «will be indistinguishable from humans except that robot drivers will be safer and more
predictable than a human driver with less than one year's driving experience.»
Sure, they may occasionally do
worse than a human driver would, he concedes, and their imperfections will inevitably even kill people.
And Volvo's Coelingh notes that a study of the European version of Pilot Assist revealed that the computer maintains safer follow distances and has fewer harsh braking
incidents than human drivers do.
Autonomous vehicles should only have to be moderately
better than human drivers before being widely used in the United States, an approach that could save thousands of lives annually even before the technology is perfected, according to a new RAND Corporation report.
Since current self - driving safety assurances aren't exactly airtight, Koopman argues that self - driving cars should be held to a way higher
standard than human drivers — say, 10 times safer than the average human — before they're given the green light.
Systems like frontal collision alerts, lane drifting alarms, rearview cameras, drowsiness detection, night vision enhancement, automatic braking assistance and more all come into play to anticipate and think
faster than the human driver, preventing human error versus enhancing it.
In an interview with The Verge, Krafcik said the Uber crash reinforced his mission to build cars that can operate more
safely than human drivers.
Self - driving cars are most likely safer
than human drivers, as Wired transportation writer Alex Davies argued after the crash.
The fallout from the accident could stall the development and testing of self - driving vehicles, designed to eventually perform far better
than human drivers and to sharply reduce the number of motor vehicle fatalities that occur each year.
Eventually, full autonomy will enable a Tesla to be substantially safer
than a human driver.
Based on current facts, the Google car doesn't seem a lot better
than human drivers 2.
Templeton argues that once auto - drive systems are proved much safer
than human drivers, it may be downright immoral to let humans drive at all.
When — or if — self - driving cars are proven safer
than human drivers, the vehicles will still have to contend with other questions, such as whether to take steps to protect passengers or pedestrians in a collision (SN: 12/24/16, p. 34).
He asks, «Will people accept a self - driving car that is safer
than a human driver but that requires them to constantly monitor the automation in anticipation of the rare occasions when intervention will be necessary?»
Yet for consumers to accept driverless vehicles, the researchers say tests will need to prove with 80 percent confidence that they're 90 percent safer
than human drivers.
We might have to wait many years for a fully autonomous electric car from GM to hit the dealerships, in part because the technology still has to mature, but also because legislation isn't ready and it's not quite clear yet how fast - or slow - regulators will move on this (if it can be convincingly shown that it saves lives and is safer
than human drivers, things might go fast).
The fallout from the accident could stall the development and testing of self - driving vehicles, designed to eventually perform far better
than human drivers and to sharply reduce the number of motor vehicle fatalities that occur each year.