The fact of the video of her stop and her subsequent public apology afterwards both went viral, probably helping her more in town court
than in the court of public opinion.
If it is not possible to resolve the disputes ourselves, then we each agree to resolve those disputes or claims between you and Bootstrap Legal of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to those relating to use of the Site or the quality or appropriateness of services offered by the Bootstrap Legal, shall be resolved by binding arbitration before Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services («JAMS»), rather
than in a court of general jurisdiction.
To controversies between a State and citizens of another State, because in case a State (that is, all the citizens of it) has demands against some citizens of another State, it is better that she should prosecute their demands in a national court
than in a court of the State to which those citizens belong, the danger of irritation and criminations arising from apprehensions and
Not exact matches
In 2000 the Supreme Court ruled (in Christensen v. Harris County that local government can compel employees to take accumulated comp time rather than take it at any time of their choosin
In 2000 the Supreme
Court ruled (
in Christensen v. Harris County that local government can compel employees to take accumulated comp time rather than take it at any time of their choosin
in Christensen v. Harris County that local government can compel employees to take accumulated comp time rather
than take it at any time
of their choosing.
A judicial review («JR») is a type
of court proceeding
in which a judge reviews the lawfulness
of a decision or action made by a public body; they are a challenge to the way
in which a decision has been made, rather
than the conclusion reached.
The oldest law school
in Canada, McGill, ranks just under U
of T. Its highly regarded law journal is cited by The Supreme
Court of Canada more often
than any other university - affiliated journal, and McGill law graduates regularly make up a quarter
of The Supreme
Court's annual clerkships.
According to a report
in Friday's New York Times, some
of Apple's top encryption engineers have threatened to resist — or even to quit — rather
than comply with a
court order to disable the iPhone security system they created.
In fact, Dovden's 35 lawsuits account for more than a third of patent litigation filed in Federal Court in the past yea
In fact, Dovden's 35 lawsuits account for more
than a third
of patent litigation filed
in Federal Court in the past yea
in Federal
Court in the past yea
in the past year.
Subject to the arbitration provisions above, and other
than small claims actions as permitted therein, any action or proceeding arising from, relating to or
in connection with these Terms
of Service will be brought exclusively
in the federal or state
courts located
in New York, New York, and you irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction
of such
courts and agree that it is a convenient forum and that you will not seek to transfer such action or proceeding to any other forum or jurisdiction, under the doctrine
of forum non conveniens or otherwise.
CANNON BALL, N.D. (AP)-- Oil could be flowing through the $ 3.8 billion Dakota Access pipeline
in less
than two weeks, according to
court documents filed by the developer just before police and soldiers started clearing a protest camp
in North Dakota where pipeline opponents had gathered for the better part
of a year.
Managers, who are mostly male, also are
in charge
of deciding who gets promoted, leading to women being promoted less often
than men, according to
court documents.
His lawyer, a former FTC attorney himself, argues
in court documents the company had more
than six million customers, meaning the 4,000 complaints collected by the FTC comprise only 0.067 %
of the total customers.
«
In some states, the
courts will agree to tack on prior years
of cohabitating... so it's viewed as a longer - term marriage
than the legal date,» Kauffman said.
In papers being filed with the state Supreme Court in Manhattan, the restaurant group likened the rule to former Mayor Michael Bloomberg's failed effort to curb sales of sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces (473 milliliters
In papers being filed with the state Supreme
Court in Manhattan, the restaurant group likened the rule to former Mayor Michael Bloomberg's failed effort to curb sales of sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces (473 milliliters
in Manhattan, the restaurant group likened the rule to former Mayor Michael Bloomberg's failed effort to curb sales
of sugary drinks larger
than 16 ounces (473 milliliters).
Wildlife advocates asked
courts to reverse lease sales on more
than 1,300 square miles
of land
in Montana, Wyoming, Utah and Nevada, according to attorneys involved.
CHICAGO, April 11 - Retailer Toys» R» Us has received multiple bids
of more
than $ 1 billion for an 85 percent stake
in its Asian business, its lawyer Joshua Sussberg said at a U.S. bankruptcy
court hearing on Wednesday.
In court documents filed with the Northern California District Court on Thursday, Uber argued that the class - action part of the suit should be dropped because the 160,000 drivers, «have little or nothing in common, other than their use of the Uber App in California at some point over the past six years.&raqu
In court documents filed with the Northern California District Court on Thursday, Uber argued that the class - action part of the suit should be dropped because the 160,000 drivers, «have little or nothing in common, other than their use of the Uber App in California at some point over the past six years.&r
court documents filed with the Northern California District
Court on Thursday, Uber argued that the class - action part of the suit should be dropped because the 160,000 drivers, «have little or nothing in common, other than their use of the Uber App in California at some point over the past six years.&r
Court on Thursday, Uber argued that the class - action part
of the suit should be dropped because the 160,000 drivers, «have little or nothing
in common, other than their use of the Uber App in California at some point over the past six years.&raqu
in common, other
than their use
of the Uber App
in California at some point over the past six years.&raqu
in California at some point over the past six years.»
Parker was acquitted
in the rape case more
than a decade ago and Celestin had his sexual assault conviction overturned on appeal (a higher
court deemed his trial attorney ineffective), but the two men have come under fire once again as the media reports troubling details from the case, which included accusations that Parker and Celestin, then both 19, had sex with a Penn State freshman while she was unconscious after a night
of heavy drinking.
There is,
of course, Apple, which hasn't done anything notable this year other
than get nailed
in court in the Great E-Book Conspiracy.
Take a view
of the Royal Exchange
in London, a place more venerable
than many
courts of justice, where the representatives
of all nations meet for the benefit
of mankind.
«This is a way that would respect the concerns
of all people and it is much more efficient
than what would happen otherwise which is British Columbia having to go to a
court in British Columbia, then potential appeals, then potentially to the Supreme Court,» Singh told a news conference in Ot
court in British Columbia, then potential appeals, then potentially to the Supreme
Court,» Singh told a news conference in Ot
Court,» Singh told a news conference
in Ottawa.
The
court order, issued on Thursday, came
in response to a flood
of individuals seeking a piece
of an estate some have valued at more
than $ 500 million, left by Prince when he died unexpectedly
in April at the age
of 57, apparently without a will.
On Wednesday he filed a complaint
in the Circuit
Court of Montgomery, Ala., calling for a delay
in certifying the results
of the Dec. 12 Senate election which saw Democrat Doug Jones prevail over Moore by more
than 20,000 votes.
Companies including (tmus) T - Mobile US Inc, Amazon (amzn) Inc and Cox Communications Inc imposed age limits on who could see recruitment ads, limiting some only to people younger
than 38, according to the lawsuit, filed
in federal
court in San Francisco by the Communications Workers
of America.
(Out
of the more
than 6,000 patent suits filed
in United States federal
courts last year nearly 25 percent were filed
in the Eastern District
of Texas, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation).
Kagame made three assertive choices: first, to stay together, bringing millions
of Hutu refugees home and allowing low - level genocide suspects to be tried
in specially formed community
courts rather
than criminal ones.
Rather
than disclosing the full extent
of problems like fraudulent home appraisals and overextended borrowers, the bank adjusted the critical reviews, according to documents filed early Tuesday
in federal
court in Manhattan.
But there is a deeper cost to eroding privacy
than just the spurring
of undesirable changes
in external entities such as
courts and communications networks.
Given the tiny amount
of revenue that would represent, Valeant apparently deemed it cheaper to give Addyi away for next to nothing rather
than spend money on marketing and on the costs
of battling the Sprout shareholders
in court.
After winning two high profile 401k fee lawsuits,
courts have approved the payment
of more
than $ 31.9 million
in legal fees.
But the biggest problem is a legal one: The U.S.
courts are more protective
of free speech
than European
courts, and
in recent years have been hostile to election regulations, notably
in the Citizens United decision
of 2010.
In practice, much
of the decision - making appears to lie with NSA analysts, rather
than the Fisa
court or senior officials.
A U.S. appeals
court vacated the conviction
of former Jefferies Group trader Jesse Litvak, the latest turn
in a case that has spanned more
than five years and helped usher
in changes to sales tactics on Wall Street.
The supreme French administrative
court, the Council
of State (or Conseil d'État), has altered the classification
of cryptocurrency capital gains, resulting
in a tax rate reduction
of more
than half for trading the digital assets.
An attorney for Toys «R» Us said
in court earlier this month that the company had received multiple bids
of more
than $ 1 billion for an 85 percent stake
in its Asian business.
A Corpus Christi man pleaded guilty today
in federal
court to conspiracy with intent to distribute more
than one kilogram
of heroin and conspiracy to launder money.
(B) at the election
of the customer at any time before final judgment is rendered, statutory damages
in a sum
of not more
than $ 5,000, as the
court considers just.
A May 16, 2016 briefing note for Fyfe, prepared
in advance
of that year's conference, said the last time
Court Services Branch held such a gathering was more
than nine years previous.
In Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 98 the Supreme
Court formalized this premise into a doctrinal test.The case involved cigarette manufacturing, an industry dominated by six firms.99 Liggett, one
of the six, introduced a line
of generic cigarettes, which it sold for about 30 % less
than the price
of branded cigarettes.100 Liggett alleged that when it became clear that its generics were diverting business from branded cigarettes, Brown & Williamson, a competing manufacturer, began selling its own generics at a loss.101 Liggett sued, claiming that Brown & Williamson's tactic was designed to pressure Liggett to raise prices on its generics, thus enabling Brown & Williamson to maintain high profits on branded cigarettes.
But now, after blowing through more
than $ 70 - million
in investor capital and accumulating $ 72 - million
in losses, while failing to reach $ 30 - million
in annual revenues, Shop.ca is
in bankruptcy
court, trying to sell its assets for a fraction
of what the company raised.
Please be advised that
in accordance with the Order Amending the Claims Procedure Order granted October 30, 2015, if the Monitor intends to revise or reject a Claim, the Monitor shall notify the Claimant who has delivered such Proof
of Claim or D&O Proof
of Claim, as applicable, that such Claim has been revised or rejected and the reasons therefor, by sending a Notice
of Revision or Disallowance by no later
than December 15, 2015, unless otherwise ordered by the
Court on application by the Monitor.
If you think the home didn't sell for its fair market value and the deficiency is therefore higher
than it should be, you can present evidence
of this
in court.
It probably won't make Wynne any more popular
in Harper's eyes, and will be one more reason for him to avoid meeting with her, but it could also be the first shot
in a Supreme
Court challenge
of the legislation, which could conceivably be much faster - tracked
than it would be if we had to wait for a Charter challenge the traditional way, which could conceivably help save lives, going back to the thrust
of the Bedford decision
in the first place.
Even if regulators do not act, when a presale results
in nothing more
than profits for its promoter, a disgruntled investor will inevitably make a private securities fraud claim to try and claw back some
of their capital; assuming a
court will determine a presale
of digital tokens to be a private placement
of securities, any such federal claim would fall under Rule 10b - 5.
It is to be noted, that UIDAI Chief Ajay Bhushan Pandey,
in a recent Supreme
Court hearing also stated that «It would take more
than the age
of the universe to break one encryption.»
The
court found that a stock trading plan established by the company's chairman, pursuant to which a broker, rather
than the chairman himself, would liquidate a portion
of the chairman's stock
in the company, did not preclude potential liability for insider trading.
More
than 95 %
of personal injury claims are settled outside
of court, but our lawyers will be by your side
in the courtroom if that is necessary to seek a positive outcome to your claim.
The Hong Kong
court's judges hear appeals
in panels
of five, which include no more
than one foreign member.
He has specialized
in corporate law and corporate litigation, primarily
in the Delaware
Court of Chancery, for more
than 20 years.
In November 2017, he achieved precedent - setting victories for investors, when the Second Circuit
Court of Appeals held that direct evidence
of price impact is not always necessary to demonstrate market efficiency to invoke the presumption
of reliance, and that defendants seeking to rebut the presumption
of reliance must do so by a preponderance
of the evidence rather
than merely meeting a burden
of production.