Sentences with phrase «than judges when»

I'm sure the shipping cost more than the judging when everything was taken into account.So the writer has bottom - lined one more time.

Not exact matches

The new celebrity judge on «The Voice,» Miley Cyrus is reportedly making just as much as Levine but less than Jennifer Lopez's $ 17.5 million when she was on «American Idol.»

Judge recommends that women pick and choose when they assert themselves — such as during salary negotiations — rather than adopt a wholesale shift into disagreeableness.

We begin to stop negative thought and behavioral patterns when we begin to accept and learn from the past rather than use it as a basis to negatively judge ourselves.

I fear, at least for the moment, history will judge this meeting as nothing more than a Potemkin summit — filled with countless photos designed to pull at your heart, when in fact, zero was achieved.

History is likely to judge this meeting as nothing more than a Potemkin summit — filled with photos designed to pull at your heart, when in fact, zero was achieved.

Research on kiosks in liquor stores in various countries found that kiosks increased the sale of hard - to - pronounce items, while some fast food locations saw results in customers ordering more calorie - rich dishes than they did when speaking to a cashier, apparently to avoid being judged for their dietary habits.

When an employee misses the mark, rather than looking at the result and judging it as wrong — a failure — get them to look at what they know now that they didn't know before.

When judges appoint the lawyers in their courtroom, speed can be more important than a vigorous defense, a lawsuit says.

«In field after field, when it comes to centrally important skills — stockbrokers recommending stocks, parole officers predicting recidivism, college admissions officials judging applicants — people with lots of experience were no better at their jobs than those with less experience.»

The treatment of other religions by Islam must be judged by a simple test: How did the Muslim rulers behave for more than a thousand years, when they had the power to «spread the faith by the sword»?

When the apostles had been asked by the government to no longer preach anything about Christ, Peter and John responded by saying «Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge, for we can not but speak of what we have seen and heard (Acts 4:19 - 20).»

When we lose faith in the essential goodness of life and our own humanity, seeing that which we judge «evil» to be more prevalent than that which we judge to be «good», then we have lost faith in either the goodness or the power of God to sustain that goodness and our God has become too small or just another Baal, a false god of our own vain imaginings, a projection of our own finite limitations and disordered desires.

He states: «Everybody knows that when the Court announces unenumerated constitutional rights... the judges are looking at more than an existing body of law.»

My wife believes him and trusts him and she is a better judge of character than I. [When she met Mark Driscoll in 1997 she said he was a «future cult - leader» and she was never happy about me hanging out with the Young Leaders Group.]

hi, listen america when it is about islam, than i am or was your judge maker president maker economy maker force maker etc well there is no happiness in it, founder type law maker but you people do not deserve to be good, don't worry i play worldwide france swiss russ eng uk pol etc any where you want me to come i will be there, i learn to hate my self in usa because i am muslim and the next is infidels nation

cit., pp. 260 - 262) In the Old Testament, accordingly, when Jacob asked the superhuman wrestler his name, he was rebuffed; (Genesis 32 - 29) when Manoah asked «the angel of Yahweh» for his name, the answer was, «Wherefore askest thou after my name, seeing it is secret»; (Judges 13:17 - 18 [marginal reading]-RRB- and when Moses sought to learn Yahweh's name, he received no clearer reply than «I AM THAT I AM.»

This simple plow announces a prophetic hope: the longstanding hope for the day when God will get God's way, a way that will turn into grander than one governed by judges, bailiffs and parole officers.

I hope that when my earth - body dies and my eternal soul is uploaded into the heavens via God's Galactic Internet that my file folder is judged as appropriate for download into a mansion that is more heavenly than this one, but that does not change that life in this mansion is what it is.

scott god also told us not to judge, so let cleflo do cleflo and you do you if you do nt understand how to percieve gods word than it could also be you i remember when i first got saved i was taught a lots of religion stuff but i kept running after god and not after man and he revile some things to me thur his holy spirit watch what you say about gods people cause we all have issues and with that being said be blessed and if hes doing wrong by gods word than he has to answer to god not you so why set yourself up to be curse for it god do nt need your help in nothing stay free cause who god set free is free indeed.

We also judge that some species have more intrinsic value than others, and this is important even when they are not so important for the system as a whole.

But we understand and judge Whitehead to be a realist, and so he must have an analysis of creative advance which gets around the problems that arise when time and space are allowed to be isomorphic with the mathematical continuum, the problem with which is that its series are dense rather than discrete.

Especially when we judge other people's mistakes and consider ourselves more enlightened, when we in reality aren't any better than they are.

You seem to have highlighted particular sins as though some are worse than others all sin leads to death not just the big ones because we all are sinners.All have gone astray none are righteous.I believe the worst sin is pride idolatry is the first commandment we set ourselves as Gods.Regardless of what the sin is, our hearts are condemned by our pride.It wasnt the sin of homosexuality or sexual deviance that destroyed sodom.It was there pride and it is one of our biggest stumbling blocks in our christian walk or it certainly was for me.We look at the story of the adulterous woman and we think adultery is a terrible crime but the story is for our benefit to show that we all are sinners that Jesus does nt condemn us but came to save us.And when Jesus says go and sin no more he was not only talking to the woman but everyone else that was around judging her for her sin its a universal message that we all need to see that we all are condemned because of our sin that Jesus came to save us and that we turn from our sin and follow him.Because he is the way the truth and the life.brentnz

When you see a young woman, addicted to drugs, living on the street, selling her body for the next hit, though you should judge her actions as wrong, be merciful and say, «There, but for the grace of God, go I.» Such an attitude will enable you to help her rather than condemn her.

Like Martin Luther's I Have a Dream Speech only I dream of a day when Christians will be judged by their actions rather than by their church attendance or denominational affiliation.

That means in this instance that economists refuse to judge whether it is better to add to the consumption of one person rather than another, that is, they are unwilling to judge that the increase of wellbeing in toto will be less when a hundred dollars is added to the income of a rich person than when it adds to the income of a poor one.

Janet i think what you have said is quite insightful and you are right and there is another meaning to Go and sin no more and that speaks to me of repentence making a decision to Follow Christ the one who saves.The words Go and sin no more is referring to a continual ongoinging process of living for Christ rather than dying in our sins daily there is no comparison.I thought that was awesome pointing the law back to all of us for we all have sinned and the judgement is death but Jesus came that we might have life in its fullness.Many people only see the adulterer when she portrays who we are as sinners that he came to save all of us sin is sin and the punishment is death so again you are quite right people use the scriptures to judge and that was never Jesus intention.I hope that helps when someone uses that scripture incorrectly and you can you use it like Jesus did to point it back at those who judge i hope that helps.brentnz

In identifying specific causal relations, event A, is almost always judged to be the cause of B, (that is, when our judgment is reasonable) because of the prior conjunction of events of sort A with events of sort B, or analogous evidence, rather than on the basis of direct discrimination of a process in B, taking account of, flowing from, or forming itself by virtue of Ai (PNK 87).4

It was not our country's place to judge that, when other nations were caught in such upheavals and were moving away from both political and economic oppression, communism was worse than any available alternative.

Basically, the Bible is more immoral than moral (Leviticus 20:10 - 27; Exodus 22:18; Judges 11:30 - 40; II Samuel 12:9 - 18; Numbers 31:17; Luke 19:22 - 31; and according to the myth, God, the creator and most powerful thing ever, let his son be killed when a simple «timeout» would have been sufficient), and we'll all be better off when the Christian / Jewish / Islamic gods and stories are viewed as myths, just as today we know Zeus, Apollo, Ra, Thor, Buddha, etc. are myths.

Whitehead realizes that a measure of discord may be so extrinsically beneficial that the discord, when considered in relation to the whole, must be judged good rather than evil.

What is sad is that when any person or persons from any christian religion say these bad things all of us that are Jesus loving people are blamed along with them.Let Christ be the judge and just love your neighbor.There is mostly good Christians than bad ones!

Judged in this way its use will be rarer than when one views negation dialectically as the road to synthesis.

I am not lessened by those that do not believe what i believe, i served this country and spent a year in Iraq, many of my fellow soldiers were Christian but i served beside Atheists, mormons, Catholics, wiccans, Jews, even a satanist, yes a satanist, and guess what, we were friends, I cared deeply for them and they for me, These were the guys that protected me so i could sleep, my life was in their hands and theirs in mine... I think you all have a very bad idea of what a Christian is, i think you have no idea what you're talking about when you judge us all as a religion... you need to get out of your house and off of your computer chair and learn what people are really about... Maybe then you will understand Humanity rather than just secularizing everybody and hating them... you are sad people, yet my beliefs teach me to pray for you, and hope that you come to reason...

There might be an even greater danger of rationalization when it comes to judging church leaders than non-religious leaders.

Other than that, really no Christian can judge another, but they should love people and try to help them, because really those people who are rebelling, are rebelling against God, and that means they are in for it when Christ judges them.

Fortunately, we had enough drinks and cool - downs for everyone, and although some tables had a slight delay because the judging 600 + products took a while, when it was all said and done, every product got tasted by more judges than usual.

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

It makes much more sense to wait and judge how a player of Cech's proven ability performs under a competent manager than to wait till the end of the season to judge Arsene the Dope when it is a foregone conclusion that he will screw up again and the only question being the magnititude of the screw up.

But when Robin hits the tanbark, he clearly is certain that he is bigger and better than any other horse in the ring, and the judges generally agree with him.

We could have stopped this 2 seasons ago, now we must pay consequence, we want team that can win big things, we already have it, we just need someone who will lead them to that goal, you cant win trophys when your manager go in public and says our opponents are just too good, its not that chelsea is unbeateble, our manager has no desire anymore, and i do nt blame him for that, he is just doing his job, we fans are final judge, if you are ok with 4 place, than enjoy this mediocre simple!!!

How about thre constant» Judge me in May» when he knows we are angry and he is just playing for more time rather than facing thre truth.

Perhaps we should judge Draper on his own merits (which admittedly is hard to do ATM when so much of what he is doing is behind the scenes) rather than who mentored him.

When the judges decided to draw straws rather than hold another jump - off, Dennehey pulled the right straw and with it almost $ 750 more in prize money.

When you feel that the supporters are there to cheer you on, not judge or diss you, mentally you have more prospects of performing above average than when you are looking over your shoulWhen you feel that the supporters are there to cheer you on, not judge or diss you, mentally you have more prospects of performing above average than when you are looking over your shoulwhen you are looking over your shoulder.

Th two examples you mention are from almost ancient history and most of us think thre last ten years far more relevant when judging Wengers ability to managert than the decade befor elast, when he was much yojunger and still in touch with reality.

Crystal Palace actually had more possession and more shots than Arsenal (and MANY MANY more corners, but The Gunners second bit of good fortune came when our second goal was also judged to be offside after the event.

And his judging is much less crazed and makes him look like a way more talented Chef than he does when he's putting bread on either side of someone's head and calling them an idiot sandwich

It's OK to dig deeper than the numbers and also use context when judging Trubisky at QB.