Sentences with phrase «than judging which»

This is different than judging which clearly goes against the way of God.

Not exact matches

After he was found guilty of some of the counts against him last months, he gave a press conference in which he declared victory — and then opined on Twitter that the judge would be unlikely to give him more than six months in prison.
Rather than judge Canada's success on abstract measures, which have little meaning to average folk — GDP, productivity, trade balances — Trudeau's candidacy is built on a pragmatic mantra: «A strong economy is the one that provides the largest number of good jobs for the largest number of Canadians.»
A judicial review («JR») is a type of court proceeding in which a judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision or action made by a public body; they are a challenge to the way in which a decision has been made, rather than the conclusion reached.
You could say that 2018 is still a young year and it's way too early to judge things, which is true, but the level of volatility in both stocks and bonds during February is making this year feel like we've lived through two full years already, and I think what the markets are signaling is more likely to be a sea change than a blip.
Independent research firm Clearview Energy Partners of Washington D.C. noted in a comment late on Wednesday that Judge Boasberg's order pointed to «omissions» in the Corps» analysis, which the Corps may be able to address quickly, rather than larger errors that might require more study.
One observer pointed out that a federal judge's ruling has actually overturned the order for now, which she suggested is doing more than Musk's chosen tactics for voicing his concern.
Under the terms of the settlement, which is still subject to a judge's approval, San Francisco - based Wells Fargo will be required to automatically mail checks to more than 250,000 mortgage holders.
On Thursday, the judge issued a one - sentence notice to parties to the to the suit, which include the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, the Financial Services Institute and others, that she intends to rule no later than Feb. 10.
Reason I ask is, you told me you were «pretty happy» with your current provider — and that is a lot different than saying «we're crushing it with our current provider and I don't see any reason to change» — which is what DiscoverOrg's clients say, judging by our incredibly high retention rate.
The Hong Kong court's judges hear appeals in panels of five, which include no more than one foreign member.
But in Illinois a judge must order a foreclosure, which means the foreclosure process in Illinois tends to take longer than it does in states that allow non-judicial foreclosure.
The lawsuit asks a judge to stop Trump and his media team from blocking critics from following his personal account, which has 33 million followers, 14 million more than @POTUS and 19 million more than @WhiteHouse.
That was the whole point — that one could be driven to revolutionary action by standards of justice that are higher than the law, and against which the law is judged.
When we lose faith in the essential goodness of life and our own humanity, seeing that which we judge «evil» to be more prevalent than that which we judge to be «good», then we have lost faith in either the goodness or the power of God to sustain that goodness and our God has become too small or just another Baal, a false god of our own vain imaginings, a projection of our own finite limitations and disordered desires.
Then their «love thy brother» and «don't judge others» book of «love» calls you a fool and swine for not believing their book which has more holes than swiss cheese.
The arrogance of «I know better than what the Bible says» is an insult to God which will be judged.
Whitehead's philosophy requires a broader conception of time, for example, one which will allow for the reality of the past in the present, a concept that the traditional metaphysician would likely judge as intuitively false, leading to the additional judgment that much of human experience is appearance rather than reality, a position which we reject, having come to a greater understanding of Whitehead's metaphysics.
But we understand and judge Whitehead to be a realist, and so he must have an analysis of creative advance which gets around the problems that arise when time and space are allowed to be isomorphic with the mathematical continuum, the problem with which is that its series are dense rather than discrete.
I do remember clearly coming across a sixth - century homily which said that we ought to go easy on one another, and not judge one another, because God regards us so much more mercifully than we regard one another, and more mercifully than we regard ourselves.
Perhaps God judged men finally more by this inner invisible reality than by the overt actions in terms of which men judge each other.
«I prefer a church which is bruised, hurting and dirty because it has been out on the streets, rather than a church which is unhealthy from being confined and from clinging to its own security... More than by fear of going astray, my hope is that we will be moved by the fear of remaining shut up within structures which give us a false sense of security, within rules which make us harsh judges, within habits which make us feel safe, while at our door people are starving and Jesus does not tire of saying to us: «Give them something to eat.»»
But Genesis 19 no more condemns all homosexuality, than Judges 19 (in which the town of Gibeah rapes a female concubine all night) condemns all heterosexuality.
Versions of those religions are still around today afterall, which actually makes them older than Christianity, therefore more true if we are judging based on the criteria of age.
In this passage it probably means no more than that «this same Jesus» has been designated God's agent in judging the world and inaugurating the new age, an office which he will soon «return» (that is, appear in visible form) to fulfill.
An individual can profit greatly by the criticism of his fellows yet he will realize that they are judging him by standards which are neither his own nor God's, that he is both a worse and a better man than their judgments indicate, and that the greatest service they can render him is to call him back to his own best self.
The same Directory also speaks of the spiritual climate in which alone there can be a successful ecumenical reception: «The life of faith and the prayer of faith, no less than reflection on the doctrine of faith, enter «into this process of reception, by which the whole Church, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit... makes her own the fruits of a dialogue, in a process of listening, of testing, of judging and of living.»
So, rather than using words long in the presence of degradation to judge this act... this behavior, I would suggest seeking that which can not be read and only felt — the spirit - to judge it by.
Its purpose is not to list and describe all of the forms of human psyc functioning which are judged by the profession or some members of the profession as less than optimal.
For what makes something a value is that it is seen to have more worth than something else, which is judged to have a lesser value, according to the overall aim or purpose one has chosen to pursue.
«Apparent» evil refers to prima facie evils which are ultimately judged to embody the best of all realistically possible alternatives; «genuine» evil refers to occurrences which embody those alternatives which are less than the best of all realistically possible occurrences.
Or we could give ourselves permission to engage in the violence of electricity production by saying (in the manner of Reinhold Niebuhr) that the kingdom that Christ's life makes visible is an «impossible possibility» which stands at the edge of history as its judge rather than being the truth about history.
«Solidarity» refers to the overall quality of our common life rather than a principle by which we can judge specific circumstances and actions.
We can rejoice that we are saved not through the immanent mechanisms of history and nature, but by grace; that God will not unite all of history's many strands in one great synthesis, but will judge much of history false and damnable; that He will not simply reveal the sublime logic of fallen nature, but will strike off the fetters in which creation languishes; and that, rather than showing us how the tears of a small girl suffering in the dark were necessary for the building of the Kingdom, He will instead raise her up and wipe away all tears from her eyes» and there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying, nor any more pain, for the former things will have passed away, and He that sits upon the throne will say, «Behold, I make all things new.»
August 28, 1963: Two hundred thousand Americans participate in the March on Washington and hear Martin Luther King, Jr., proclaim his dream of a country in which his children will be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin; ten months later, Congress enacts the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
«More than by fear of going astray, my hope is that we will be moved by the fear of remaining shut up within structures which give us a false sense of security, within rules which make us harsh judges, within habits which make us feel safe, while at our door people are starving.»
First, since human society always employs violence to enforce some set of standards, Christians» whom Christ called to live out a radically different form of community, one in which it is the crucified rather than his judges who is vindicated as God's Word» should simply take up the burden of civic order and abandon the Gospel where prudentially necessary because, you know, someone absolutely has to kill heretics, and so we should make sure the right heretics get killed.
Wow... first, we have a mother that is so clueless that she can not see what she is doing to her child... very selfish... then, somehow, something so dumb only gets worse because a judge who is obviously more cuckoo than the mom decides what name is «not allowed»... guess it's not as bad as the morons who tried to name their kid Hitler, or the other morons who tried for Osama bin Laden... which leads me to the question... do Muslim extremists kill people who name their child Muhammad after the prophet, and then photograph him?
The custom recounted in the performance of levirate marriage in Ruth 4:8 (by which the brother or the next closest male kin takes the wife of the deceased relative) is, we should judge, considerably earlier than Deuteronomy.
Othniel is a tribal designation, certainly; but is the episode of judges 1:11 - 15, in which Othniel figures ostensibly as an individual, anything other than a tribal encounter, reduced and idealized in terms of personal relationships?
On this basis the trial judge concluded that (para 298) «if Franklins was in the relevant market with Metcash (as the Commission clearly contended), it must be the case that the major supermarket chains, which his Honour found to be a closer competitive constraint than Franklins, must be included in that market.»
goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?
Having started last, an excellent position in which to judge the speeds he must average, Moss got no farther than the first bend outside Brescia.
Perhaps we should judge Draper on his own merits (which admittedly is hard to do ATM when so much of what he is doing is behind the scenes) rather than who mentored him.
All Wilshere needs is an injury free season which makes his situation more frustrating.You have to judge a player looking at his top form because that's the player's highest point.At top form he can still be in the Arsenal squad.Deny it all you want but if he had Ramsey's fitness he'd be better than him.Also at Bournemouth he was their best player as expected and I quite remember him having some man of the match performances.Don't let the stat deceive you.He did well at Bournemouth and against Chelsea and Liverpool.What he needs is an injury free season but for that he needs to go elsewhere.I'm just praying he has the luck of Van Persie for one season.He can still do it.
You need proper structured investment, planning & most importantly ambition which starts from the owner... Does Leicester winning the championship make them a top club — No Does Monaco winning the Ligue 1 make them bigger than Psg ---- No Does Dortmund winning the bundesliga make them bigger than Bayern — No Similarly we won't be bigger than Man utd, Man C even if we win the title.We're bigger than City, Chelsea if judged by history but not ambition.
Why, it's almost as if he thinks that the job of managing a football club is one that should be judged in the medium - and long - term rather than the short -; that the most important thing is where Manchester City find themselves at the end of this season and those to come; and that the best way to get performances from his players is to back them and his own methods, in which he has absolute and justified faith.
He could receive a maximum of five years (no sentencing date has been set), but it's more likely that if Judge Edward Coleman sentences him to any jail time at all, it will be less than a year, which would be served in county jail instead of in a state penitentiary.
With all their different criteria, which dwell more on overall schedule strength than the human polls tend to do, how will this week's upheaval be judged by the arbiters of the Playoff?
His early career was spent as a scoring forward before he was moved into a shutdown role... he had an excellent NHL article from 2013 or so at stealing the puck, and his last 3 years worth of stats which FTF used in judging the trade were from when he was injured and then sidelined and then moved around the lower leagues, which made him look much worse than when he was healthy.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z