Sentences with phrase «than knowledge about»

The participants in the CCM program gain much more than knowledge about various practical aspects of copyright and licensing; they learn to manage fair use / dealing; find practical strategies and tools to say «yes» when asked by colleagues to use copyright - protected content; gain confidence in applying their knowledge; and join an excellent network of like - minded people.

From Moltmann: «Life is more than knowledge about the laws of life; and in the same way the fellowship of Christ and fellowship with one another are more than knowledge about its conditions.

Not exact matches

On a scale out of seven, the magazine staff rated 4.8, meaning we're about as happy as employees in the ever - downtrodden manufacturing sector and significantly less happy than the normal knowledge - based worker.

According to Wolt, this statement reveals more about Ayyadurai's lack of knowledge about food safety than about food safety itself.

The guitarist who combines the two knowledge types will be better than those who only read about playing and those who practice without studying the greats.

This is less about replacing knowledge workers than it is about augmenting their abilities.

About Elanco Elanco provides comprehensive products and knowledge services to improve animal health and food - animal production in more than 70 countries around the world.

As human resources staff gain comprehensive knowledge about the most popular desires of their employees, they can communicate more frequently about those items — ideally to a targeted audience — rather than deliver a canned, generic presentation about all benefits once a year to all employees.

Professor Malia Mason of Columbia University Business School says using an exact number rather than a round one «signals that you have more knowledge about the value of the good being negotiated.»

Being able to talk about economic concepts with a bit more knowledge than we have, requires reading this book.

It cited 2016 Pew Research Center data showing that more than 55 percent of households older than age 65 watch cable news programs, and it noted that «one multi-country study found that public broadcast news (such as PBS) increased political knowledge, while cable news actually reduced knowledge that people have about actual events.»

Be more intelligent than you've ever been before with in - depth knowledge about your operation — and the market at large — like you've never had before.

«It's tempting when you start out to think your knowledge about finance and valuation will lead you to all the answers, but I now put more emphasis on qualitative than quantitative analysis» Jake Rosser

I would hope your marketing advice is more intelligent than your obvious lack of knowledge about medical conditions and medical statistics.

Mr. Tillerson has more detailed knowledge about Alberta's oil industry than many Albertans, having spent billions of dollars in the province as chief executive officer of Exxon Mobil.

It cited 2016 Pew Research Center data showing that more than 55 % of households older than age 65 watch cable news programs, and it noted that «one multi-country study found that public broadcast news increased political knowledge, while cable news actually reduced knowledge that people have about actual events.»

You just have to take the time to think about it long enough to see that these ancient written texts were written by humans with less knowledge about science than we have now.

As a chaplain asst, I know you have a better knowledge than I do about the rules and culture within the armed services.

Yet even if they tried, the evangelists could not put aside their knowledge of the crucifixion and resurrection and feel what the people of Galilee felt, any more than someone writing today about Jewish history in the 1930s can put aside their knowledge of the horror of the Holocaust or of the creation of the state of Israel.

Moreover, this knowledge is empathetic, intimate, sympathetic knowledge, closer to feeling than to rationality.27 It is knowledge «by acquaintance»; it is not «information about.»

Indeed, its two key principles — that knowledge should be pursued for its own sake rather than just when it is useful, and that knowledge is incomplete and distor ted if it doesn't include knowledge about God — are more relevant than ever in our consumerist and secularised age.

And giving his credentials — I think he has a bit more knowledge about this than you.

Part of the difficulties of Cartesian philosophy, and of any philosophy which accepts [presentational immediacy] as a complete account of perception, is to explain how we know more than this meager fact about the world although our only avenue of direct knowledge limits us to this barren residuum.

If talk about God is to express more than intellectually satisfying constructions, abstract ideals, and hopes, theologians will have to show in fact that Hartshorne is wrong when he says that «our knowledge of the concrete divine reality is negligibly small» (NTT 77).

But I would hope that published writers, especially Christian ones, would have a little more humility than to speak with such certainty about topics of which they have limited knowledge and experience.

To cite the famous analogy of William James, which has been reinforced since his time by much more knowledge of depth psychology than was then available, personality is like an iceberg of which about one tenth is visible while the rest lies beneath the surface.

«but more profound scientific knowledge will lead you a few of you to God», rather than being so positive about something you can't be positive about... especially since, I would never be one of «God's followers, believers, whatever», even if I saw him face to face and shook his hand.

I suspect that most people reading this article have more knowledege than the average person on religion, since they are interested in reading an article about people that lack knowledge.

And thank her as well for having more knowledge and expertise about life than anybody else you will ever meet.

«His work in philosophy forms part, and a very important part, of the movement of twentieth - century realism; but whereas the other leaders of that movement came to it after a training in late - nineteenth - century idealism, and are consequently realistic with the fanaticism of converts and morbidly terrified of relapsing into the sins of their youth, a fact which gives their work an air of strain, as if they cared less about advancing philosophical knowledge than about proving themselves good enemies of idealism, Whitehead's work is perfectly free from all this sort of thing, and he suffers from no obsessions; obviously he does not care what he says, so long as it is true.

For millions of years a tide of knowledge has risen ceaselessly about him through the stuff of the cosmos; and that in him which he calls his «I» is nothing other than this tide atomically turning inward upon itself.

We know so much more than people of the past — not only scientific knowledge about the physical world, but also historical knowledge about our cultural origins.

If there is one thing more than another which any one will admit who has the smallest knowledge of the world, it is that men are always speaking gravely and earnestly and with the utmost possible care about the things that are not important, but always talking frivolously about the things that are.

why do nt you stick to writing about things you have knowledge of rather than warn against those things you do not.

And, you're there as a «newbie» and probably receiving more knowledge about Him than any of the seminary classes / degrees!

I'm not making claims about my comparative knowledge and I certainly know less than many people who post on here.

They probably have more knowledge about church weekends away than you do 5 / / Set up payment plans, allowing people to pay in instalments.

If God truly is as infinite as we claim, then all the compiled knowledge and ideas about God are nothing more than a speck of insight compared to the infinity of God.

Yet I still had no more knowledge about how to change anything — and no more ability to do so — than when I first opened each book.

Nii, the irony of your ignorance is that atheists generally have more knowledge about the teachings of the bible than the majority of its followers.

Whoever has read about religious change almost anywhere in the world has to be impressed how this shift occurred in America with no dead bodies, no (to my knowledge) physical wounds from intergroup squabbles, and fewer psychic scars than one could have expected.

It's not clear what you've demonstrated here other than a lack of knowledge and a lack of understanding about how arguments are made.

Dudley has more than a cursory knowledge of the existing literature about the church, and he finds much of it sadly deficient.

I don't believe in any gods, but I am glad of the diversity of the historic religions and of the continued diversity of belief today which I think teaches us about humanity and keeps our minds open for future knowledge that may be radically different than we expect.

The problem here is that the special knowledge that such people have (knowledge about physics) doesn't make their opinions in this area any better than those of anyone else.

Many people think catechesis is only about knowledge, others think it is only about a religious experience: the Church is always richer in her thinking than any one of us, and asks us to participate in this integral, objective and personal handing on.

But I read Genesis a bit differently from him, and I am therefore less sanguine than he is about the penultimate prospects of our knowledge under any description, even the description of knowing as an act of love.

As for biology, if God is the creator of all (as Christianity contends), I believe He would understand the human body somewhat better than you or I. Based on the technology of the time, imparting knowledge about DNA, genetics, etc. would be pointless, no?

Perhaps evidence more compelling than what I've read does exist... but regardless, we still have firm evidence, based on all prior scientific knowledge... that whatever the truth is, about «creation» and everything else... is it is all logical, following natural law, even if its natural law we don't yet know.

Pope John Paul II had this to say about it:» New knowledge has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution as more than a hypothesis.