Sentences with phrase «than market price thinking»

I have learned this lesson the hard way, missing out on a stock that was falling, and the metrics looked good, but I bid a lower than market price thinking it was going to drop to my price, but then of course, it turned, and never looked back... being stubborn I did not raise my bid until after it was no longer appealing to me.

Not exact matches

«We don't think it's a consensus call that the Duvernay will work out exceptionally, but we're of the view that it's better than what the market has priced in.»

«I'm not going to be dismissive of the risks, but I think markets have priced them in and if anything as we look at the fundamentals of stock markets around the world, the fundamentals of European equities right now are I think significantly better than they are for the United States,» said the managing partner of Triogem Asset Management and global investing expert on CNBC's «Fast Money.»

«I think the next [e-commerce] wave [which is predicted to grow to a $ 300 billion market] is going to care more about price than service,» Lore told Inc.'s Christine Lagorio - Chafkin.

Think about it; if you were unlucky enough to buy into the stock market at the peak in 2008, just before the financial crisis hit full force, your gains (excluding dividends) wouldn't buy you much more than two loaves of price - fixed bread at Loblaws and a bag of President's Choice sour grapes.

Chair Yellen, with real growth over the recovery a little slower than we thought, output gaps and job market slack still on the scene, prices appearing to decelerate and wages / compensation revealing little in the way of threatening pressures, try as I might — and I repeat, I'm solidly in your camp — I don't see the rationale for tightening, even a little.

«As the sellers realize that the market is a little bit lower than they thought it was, and start lowering their prices, activity picks up,» Lorber said.

More than any press release, sales pitch, or catalog description, the reference price tells the market what a company really thinks a new product is worth.

I think more than anything that a price correction could occur more than a recession or severe bear market.

Then if you think you're unlucky because the market sells off just after you bought, think again and reconsider whether or not you were unlucky or whether you just got your wish and are now able to scale in at lower rather than higher prices as you build your positions before the Gold Rocket Ship blasts - off.

The recommendations relating to competition have not been enacted (yet)- they included reinstating specific anti-price discrimination provisions, inhibiting firms achieving market power through takeovers or abusing market power (because they didn't think ss 46 and / or 50 were effective in achieving this) and expressly defining «market power» «so that it is less than market dominance and does not require a firm to have unfettered power to set prices» (apparently they were unfamiliar with the 2007 amendments to s 46).

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I think the conclusions are: — the market is very price sensitive, — there is a sweet spot (and it's a lot lower than NYC thinks)-- the specific spot depends on the property and the niche (sounds like real estate, doesn't it?)

Comparisons are being made to the color NOOK, the thinking being that Amazon can create their own tablet OS (rather than going to Google), add their content, avoid the Android Market by substituting their own, and get a product to market for a reasonable Market by substituting their own, and get a product to market for a reasonable market for a reasonable price.

On the other hand, when you make a decision to price something substantially higher than comparable products in the market, you begin to think about value.

Price competition has increased in the Common Market as expected, but American manufacturers have played a much smaller role in this than one would think.

I think it can do well in market with a decent price tag, Lower than galaxy SII around 25k.

It is doubtful they make a penny from the sale of a Kindle, for example, but the average Kindle owner buys something like 15 books a year, and there is high profit for Amazon in downloading a data file with a retail price of $ 10 or more.Convince me there is another solution which makes sound * business sense * — not what you think a user would want to see, but a solution which would otherwise justify Amazon bringing to market a device which by itself would generate nothing more than a tiny profit to a small loss for each device sold.

Yes, it's $ 40 more than the Glo, but heck, $ 40 extra bucks (that's one, maybe 2 hardcover books in price, not a HUGE deal... I mean if you're in the e-reader market, I don't think you're down to choosing between food or an e-reader — no disrespect meant there with that comment by the way) and the bigger, better screen is a real quantitative plus.

However, I know from emails that I get that a lot of people who follow me think that «price action trading» means trading any old price action setup; they seem to totally ignore the market context that the setups occur in, which is actually just as important, if not more than the individual setup itself.

With over 10 years of experience in the fields of research, marketing, sales and distribution, Opperman saw in his situation, an opportunity to create a platform where sellers receive more money than ever thought possible, while at the same time the buyers are able to purchase diamonds and jewelry at below retail prices; for the first time ever, a unique model that adds value to both sides of the equation.

In my small unique book «The small stock trader» I also had more detailed overview of tens of stock trading mistakes (http://thesmallstocktrader.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/stock-day-trading-mistakessinceserrors-that-cause-90-of-stock-traders-lose-money/): • EGO (thinking you are a walking think tank, not accepting and learning from you mistakes, etc.) • Lack of passion and entering into stock trading with unrealistic expectations about the learning time and performance, without realizing that it often takes 4 - 5 years to learn how it works and that even +50 % annual performance in the long run is very good • Poor self - esteem / self - knowledge • Lack of focus • Not working ward enough and treating your stock trading as a hobby instead of a small business • Lack of knowledge and experience • Trying to imitate others instead of developing your unique stock trading philosophy that suits best to your personality • Listening to others instead of doing your own research • Lack of recordkeeping • Overanalyzing and overcomplicating things (Zen - like simplicity is the key) • Lack of flexibility to adapt to the always / quick - changing stock market • Lack of patience to learn stock trading properly, wait to enter into the positions and let the winners run (inpatience results in overtrading, which in turn results in high transaction costs) • Lack of stock trading plan that defines your goals, entry / exit points, etc. • Lack of risk management rules on stop losses, position sizing, leverage, diversification, etc. • Lack of discipline to stick to your stock trading plan and risk management rules • Getting emotional (fear, greed, hope, revenge, regret, bragging, getting overconfident after big wins, sheep - like crowd - following behavior, etc.) • Not knowing and understanding the competition • Not knowing the catalysts that trigger stock price changes • Averaging down (adding to losers instead of adding to winners) • Putting your stock trading capital in 1 - 2 or more than 6 - 7 stocks instead of diversifying into about 5 stocks • Bottom / top fishing • Not understanding the specifics of short selling • Missing this market / industry / stock connection, the big picture, and only focusing on the specific stocks • Trying to predict the market / economy instead of just listening to it and going against the trend instead of following it

Being patient while trading with price action goes something like this: you see what looks like a decent pin bar formation but it is going against a rather strong trend, because you know that this setup has a much lower probability of working out than a pin bar setup with a strongly trending market, you sit on your hands and pass it up, don't think anymore about it, even if it works out it does not matter because you just exercised patience, and you will be rewarded for it the more you use it.

Every long - focused investor is buying stocks because he / she presumably thinks the stock is worth more than the market price.

Or, if we're to invert the issue, are there any active long investors who are buying stocks they think are worth less than market price?

While the bottom - up investor has to spend considerable time on research, I think the workload is manifestly lighter than it is for top - down analysts who have to worry about day - to - day price movements and who have to spend a lot of time studying and opining about «will - o» - the wisp» matters such as the historic behavior of markets (i.e., BETA), the direction of interest rates, and other things they can't possibly know much about.

And other days, «Mr. Market» comes by and says, «I'll buy your interest at a price that's way higher than you think its worth.»

Most value investors, control investors, distress investors and venture capital promoters think, and act, more like TAVF than like market participants affected vitally by near - term securities price fluctuations.

The amount of an instrument (equity, future, option commodity etc.) that they can buy in one day will be governed by a number of things, most notably how much cash or credit they have (they normally have more cash and cash equivalents on hand than most human beings will see in their life), how much they can afford to move the market price (including how fair they think the valuation is currently) and the liquidity of the market for the instrument as a whole.

Juicy Excerpt: I think that the biggest cause of the problem is an unfortunate marketing reality: there's generally more money to be made selling stocks than there is to be made selling the safe asset classes that investors should be buying into when stock prices...

I think it's a time to preserve principal — there is more credit risk than the market is pricing in.

23:52 «People are going to be almost certainly disappointed going forward; they think they're going to get better than market returns, but they're virtually doomed to get lower than market returns because prices are so much higher»

The markets are a lot simpler than most people think; they are really just reflections of human behavior as plotted by the price action on the charts.

However, keep in mind, if the market price of the stock goes the opposite direction than you thought, your loss is unlimited.

On a mid-price basis, this happens more often than you might think, and I've become better at checking and considering alternative markets / prices these days before trading.

Think of an early - stage technology stock with a price that bounces up and down more than the market.

You don't care so much about the daily prices offered by Mr. Market for your stocks, any more than a gas - station owner thinks daily about what he could sell his business for.

In other words, we sometimes think the market is going to earn more than that 7 % so we bid prices way up at an unsustainable rate and then reality hits us over the head and the market corrects to adjust back towards the average rate of return.

Instead of trying to value the IP I thought I might look at how Mr. Market has valued the IP at the end of the last 4 quarters (I've used the announcement date rather than the quarter - end date for price as that is when investors were privy to what was happening).

I have no idea where the market is going tomorrow, and if I think it's going to go up, why not buy it at the current price than risk losing the position?

With regard to petroneft do nt think overleveraging or even cash burn is the main problem but the horrific Russian taxes which are up to 80 % of sales price (if exported) somewhat less if sold to domestic market Abd this leaves a gross profit of less than ten dollars a barrel..

Most professionals invert the process, and rather than trying estimate what a stock is worth, they estimate what they think the company will return at the current market price.

Technical analysis is probably older than you think, possibly as old as the stock market, but at least as old as the familiar charts that show stock prices over time as squiggly lines.

A quick note regarding their fills, while purchasing my MSFT, I did notice when the order went through, that it was $ 1 higher than current market price, which I thought was interesting but it didn't bother me.

This formula is a bit more expensive than some others on the market, however, we think the quality of the product merits the price.

They can't afford the big marketing spend, but still charge more than they should for copies of their games (I think the optimal price for indie games is $ 5, not $ 20) to get that ARPU.

What ppl do nt think about is that WiiU has to devote processing power to render on the gamepad, so in effect WiiU is running higher resolutions than the standard console setup is (and potentially even higher res than a standard PS4 / 720 setup) This is the first time Nintendo sold a system at a loss off the bat, and if WiiUs price isn't low enough for the markets, PS4 / 720 won't be remotely affordable for the masses.

While you could argue this comes at a price since, historically, salaries in the region have been on average between 20 and 30 % lower than in the major legal markets, Danielson notes: «We have been seeing a small but potentially significant shift in thinking among many firms towards raising their compensation packages, in part to be competitive for top candidates from other markets, but more likely because the econ

Thinking about this decision in the context of home rental coverage somewhat takes the focus off of price, but of course we can't remove it too far from these considerations because we're all consumers and we all need to do what we can to put our money to work for us in the open market, and it is no different with St Peters renters insurance than it is with any other commodity.

I think it should have special appeal to the amateur market because Inkling's format allows people to ease into the book piecemeal, rather than commit to the whole thing (the hardcover version of Pro Chef is a behemoth, with a list price of $ 75 and clocking in at 1232 pages.)