I think you could do Airbnb in a unit or 2 and see how it goes, you can also allow others to do a rental arbitrage model and still generate higher
than market returns on your units.
Not exact matches
From that sample, we seek out companies that have
return on equity of at least 12 % and a beta above 1, indicating that a company is less volatile
than the
market average.
«Our job is to drive tangible
return on the
marketing investment of clients, and the work we're doing is having greater impact
than ever before,» he says.
Authors of The Fundamental Index: A Better Way to Invest, they found that building indexes based purely
on market cap produced worse
returns than indexes based
on other measures.
«Several decades back, a
return on equity of as little as 10 percent enabled a corporation to be classified as a «good» business — i.e., one in which a dollar reinvested in the business logically could be expected to be valued by the
market at more
than 100 cents.
Instead of relying
on market returns, it may prove more useful to keep an eye
on the long term, and to look at the volatility of any particular moment with more objectivity
than emotion.
Generally speaking, any
marketing effort where the CLTV is higher
than the CAC delivers a
return on your investment and is something you should continue to invest in.
In fact, fifty - one percent of global
marketing executives point to video over other types of content for best
return on investment and marketers who use video grow revenue forty - nine percent faster
than non-video users.
The performance goals upon which the payment or vesting of any Incentive Award (other
than Options and stock appreciation rights) that is intended to qualify as Performance - Based Compensation depends shall relate to one or more of the following Performance Measures:
market price of Capital Stock, earnings per share of Capital Stock, income, net income or profit (before or after taxes), economic profit, operating income, operating margin, profit margin, gross margins,
return on equity or stockholder equity, total shareholder
return,
market capitalization, enterprise value, cash flow (including but not limited to operating cash flow and free cash flow), cash position,
return on assets or net assets,
return on capital,
return on invested
The following may be true of a potential takeover: • the company has fewer
than 50 million shares outstanding; • management is dominated by persons near retirement age; • management's record
on innovations and improving
returns has been poor; • the company owns assets whose
market values are potentially higher
than those shown
on the balance sheet; • outside investors have been steadily buying the stock.
For example, Alibaba and Tencent — both
on the forefront of the e-commerce wave in China — have risen by 98 % and 111 %, respectively, so far in 2017.2 Companies such as Sina, a global Internet media company, and Baidu, which operates an Internet search engine, have also generated
returns this year that are nearly as strong or stronger
than those of Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, or Google.3 As the world's second - largest economy, China is rapidly evolving from its former status as a noteworthy emerging
market to an economic powerhouse
on the rise.
Comprising more
than 20 % of the S&P 500 Index this year based
on market capitalization, the Technology sector frequently drives the index's performance, and has generated roughly 150 % of the
returns of any other single sector in 2017.
That's because average stock
market returns have been higher
than those
on bonds and savings accounts over time.
Our funds may be affected by reduced opportunities to exit and realize value from their investments, by lower
than expected
returns on investments made prior to the deterioration of the credit
markets and by the fact that we may not be able to find suitable investments for the funds to effectively deploy capital, all of which could adversely affect the timing of new funds and our ability to raise new
That's twice the average 74 %
return for those who moved out of stocks and into cash during the fourth quarter of 2008 or first quarter of 2009.3 More
than 25 % of the investors who sold out of stocks during that downturn never got back into the
market — missing out
on all of the recovery and gains of the following years.
An investment in a limited partner interest in a private equity fund is more illiquid and the
returns on such investment may be more volatile
than an investment in securities for which there is a more active and transparent
market.
This continuous pricing and the ability to place limit orders — means the ETF's performance for any given time period is based largely
on the
market price
return during the holding period, rather
than on the ETF's net asset value (NAV)-- the value of the stocks held by the ETF.
And make sure your future investment
return calculations are reasonable — despite historical stock
market returns lately, experts say you shouldn't count
on higher
than a 4 percent
return going forward.
Scaling our positions in proportion to the
market's expected
return / risk profile, based
on prevailing conditions (rather
than trying to forecast
market turns), is the essential practice.
The economic gains and
market returns that emerged during the Reagan Administration began from a starting point of 10.8 % unemployment, a current account surplus, and
market valuations that -
on the most historically reliable measures - were less
than one - quarter of present levels.
The reason why valuations are so tightly correlated with 10 - 12 year
returns is that extreme deviations from historical norms tend to wash out over that horizon, and because interest rate fluctuations have a much less durable impact
on market valuations
than investors imagine.
A beta of 1.00 indicates that the fund's
returns will,
on average, be as volatile as the
market and move in the same direction; a beta higher
than 1.00 indicates that if the
market rises or falls, the fund will rise or fall respectively but to a greater degree; a beta of less
than 1.00 indicates that if the
market rises or falls, the fund will rise or fall to a lesser degree.
British Journal of Industrial Relations, 54 (1) 2016, 55 - 82, showing that such companies had higher
return on equity
than low equity and profit sharing companies, based
on a sample representing 10 % of sales and employment and 20 % of total
market value of the entire NYSE and NASDAQ comparing companies with broad - based shares to companies without broad - based shares.
And yet if you'd invested $ 10,000 in Southwest Airlines
on Dec. 31, 1972 (when it was just a tiny little outfit with three airplanes, barely reaching breakeven and besieged by larger airlines out to kill the fledgling), your $ 10,000 would have grown to nearly $ 12 million by the end of 2002, a
return 63 times better
than the general stock
market.
Where can you find a better
return on investment
than the stock
market?
As a result, even though expected
returns on stocks were actually negative
on a 10 - 12 year horizon in 2000, and are presently 0 - 2 %
on that horizon, the expected
return on a traditional portfolio mix is actually lower at present
than at any point in history except the 1929 and 1937
market peaks.
With no prior 6 - month losses to recover, it seems likely that other factors will exert a stronger effect
on market returns going forward
than if the Fed's easing had been initiated in response to a major low.
Considering that no other
marketing tool gives you direct and exclusive access to verified leads, with no initial, monthly or participation fees, there is no better
return on your
marketing dollar
than using feeDuck.com!
Considering their low correlation and superior performance (higher profit margins and
return on equity) to the sputtering tech sector that have been pushing this
market to new highs, and the more
than 70 publicly traded names, it seems like there's something
on the menu for everyone.
Our actual expectation is that the completion of the current
market cycle is likely to wipe out the entire total
return of the S&P 500 — in excess of Treasury bill
returns — all the way back to roughly October 1997; an outcome that would require a
market retreat no larger
than it experienced in the past two cycles, and that would not even carry historically reliable valuation measures to materially undervalued levels (see When You Look Back
On This Moment In History).
Email still has a much higher
return on investment
than any other type of online
marketing.
For all asset classes (but focusing
on currencies), they define bad
market conditions as months when the excess
return on the broad value - weighted U.S. stock
market is less
than 1.0 standard deviation below its sample period average.
Our perspective is straightforward:
on the basis of measures that have been reliably correlated with actual subsequent
market returns in
market cycles across a century of data, we estimate that the S&P 500 Index will be no higher a decade from now
than it is today.
The long / short strategy based
on the joint quality and value signal generated excess
returns of 61 basis points per month, twice that generated by the quality or value signals alone and a third higher
than the
market, despite running at a volatility of only 9.7 %.
If the rate of
return on your money is lower
than the inflation rate you're actually losing money by keeping yours in a money
market account.
The iPath S&P 500 VIX Short Term Futures TM ETN (NYSE: VXX) jumped more
than 8 percent
on fears that bearish
market volatility is
returning to the
market.
If you are ready to once and for all see a real
return on your investment in social media and digital
marketing you need to look deeper
than the follows, clicks and retweets.
We size our positions based
on our assessment of risk and
return rather
than basing that decision
on market capitalization.
Some franchisees, particularly people who sign Area Development Agreements to control an entire
market, may spend more
than $ 20,000 per center for grand opening advertising because they believe they will receive a
return on that investment.
Conclusion In general, the historical movement of inflation provides evidence that real rates of
return on T - bills will revert closer to historical norms rather
than what we experienced during the Great Bull
Market.
To build a business case for content - driven inbound
marketing, you need to show that it will generate a better
return on investment
than traditional methods.
On February 14, the week after the Dow Jones Industrial Average experienced two separate days of more than 1,000 - point losses, the House Financial Services» Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Securities and Investment convened a hearing to discuss various legislative proposals to return to the wild west era of derivatives trading on Wall Stree
On February 14, the week after the Dow Jones Industrial Average experienced two separate days of more
than 1,000 - point losses, the House Financial Services» Subcommittee
on Capital Markets, Securities and Investment convened a hearing to discuss various legislative proposals to return to the wild west era of derivatives trading on Wall Stree
on Capital
Markets, Securities and Investment convened a hearing to discuss various legislative proposals to
return to the wild west era of derivatives trading
on Wall Stree
on Wall Street.
Are anomaly premiums (expected winners minus losers among assets within a class, based
on some asset characteristic) more or less predictable
than broad
market returns?
«Whilst in recent weeks we have seen some recovery in the
market, unfortunately, the overall global dairy commodity
markets remain weaker
than last year, which continues to impact
on our
returns.
there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns
than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan
on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the
market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move
on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability
than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer
than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only
return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season
than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions
than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs
on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved
on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders
on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the
return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed
on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building
on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence
on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more
than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their
market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time
on the training table as
on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small
market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big
market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought
on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more
than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center
than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger
on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
Satisfy your customers and win in the stock
market, says a new study by a team of researchers from Michigan's University Research Corridor, who found positive stock
returns on customer satisfaction far out - distance competitive
market measures that have been in play for more
than half a century.
Now that a release schedule rests
on more high - risk tentpoles that statistically yield more
returns than smaller bets, and viral word - of - mouth can kill a movie no matter how much a studio pummels the public with
marketing, it's essential to deliver the goods.
And a criminal record weighs more heavily
on black efforts to
return to the labor
market than on white efforts.
In fact, Heckman's work demonstrates that investments in early childhood education have a higher
return on investment
than the stock
market.