Sentences with phrase «than market value due»

I have a wholesale opportunity where I have negotiated the sale price down much lower than market value due to a motivated seller who just wants to get rid of the property.

Not exact matches

Stock in structured - finance firm Coventree lost more than half its value Tuesday after it said various Coventree - sponsored trusts could not fund maturities of Canadian asset - backed commercial paper due to what it called a «market disruption.»

For instance, since reaching a low in 2009 due to the stock market crash, PepsiCo shares have more than doubled in value.

«Despite an estimated $ 3 trillion of art assets in the world, only $ 44 billion trades in a given year — and less than 2 percent of qualified buyers participate in this market due to high transaction costs, long lead times, and limited transparency on pricing and value,» Artsy will bring this last major consumer category online and thereby substantially expand the size of the global art market.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

maybe you don't understand that Wenger's words are simply an attempt to recover some of the market value that was lost due to the way they have mishandled his contract negotiations, which means that everyone, once again, knows that we have little to no leverage when it comes to negotiating a transfer... much like we did with RVP, when we sold the EPL trophy to ManU for less than $ 25 million... any reputable team with a sporting director would never have allowed this situation to occur again and if they had heads would roll... if handled correctly the worst case scenario would have seen us get a minimum of $ 65 million for a player of his ilk in the present economic climate and we could have used those funds to purchase the best available striker in the early days of the transfer window... just imagine what outsiders must think about the state of our team if all you did was read the headlines... sadly, things might just might be worse than they think

This will probably work best for you if you owe far less then the value of your home and can handle accepting a lower offer than what you feel it's truly worth — due to the currently depressed market.

You and your estate will never owe more than the fair market value of the home as determined by a licensed FHA - certified appraiser when the reverse mortgage loan becomes due and payable.

Second, a stock could be «on sale» and selling for a lower price than its actual value due to market conditions or an overall industry decline; or

Insurance.com noted if a car has been totaled and the amount due on the loan is greater than the car's value, the insurance company will pay out the car's actual cash value (defined as the market value prior to damage from the accident).

Due to accounting conventions on treatment of certain costs, the market value of equity is typically higher than the book value of a company, producing a P / B ratio above 1.

Therefore, when the last homeowner dies (and the reverse mortgage is due), the estate will never be responsible for paying back more than the fair market value of the home.

Having equity means the market value of your home is greater than the outstanding balance of all liens on the property — that is, your mortgage loan, any second mortgage or home equity loans, plus other liens, such as tax liens or Homeowners Association dues.

If your nest egg's value drops sharply, say, due to a market downturn or higher - than - expected withdrawals to cover unanticipated expenses, you may need to trim your scheduled withdrawal to avoid running through your savings prematurely.

Lender will do their best to get the highest price possible for the house although the house may sell for less than fair market value due to its condition or other factors in the housing market.

This is because book values of assets (and hence equity) are usually lower than their market value (e.g. due to historical cost convention and impairment losses) whereas the book value of debt remains relatively close to its market value (e.g. interest on bank loan is usually adjusted periodically in line with prevailing market interest rates).

If the total market value of your Institutional Class shares account declines to less than $ 100,000 due to a redemption, we may convert your Institutional Class shares into Investor Class shares of the Fund on the basis of relative NAV's.

I then purchased stocks and have since been holding the stock due to its market value being much lower than my book value.

Even if people can afford to make the payments, they're walking away from their homes, given that the amount the owe is now greater than the value of the property, due to the market declines of the last few years.

We have concluded that no other - than - temporary impairment losses occurred for the auction rate securities that began to fail to settle in fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 because we believe that the decline in fair value is due to general market conditions, these investments are of high credit quality, and we have the intent and ability to hold these investments until the anticipated recovery in fair value occurs.

We have a value - add multifamily deal where the renovation took longer than expected due to bad weather and permitting delays, however we achieved rents well above our underwriting and thanks to cooperating capital markets, we achieved an appraised value above our underwriting and refinanced returning a majority of capital to investors.

Due to fluctuating market conditions, at the time of distribution, your annuity value may be more or less than the total of all premium payments.

The stock markets of Chile, Taiwan, Malaysia, and South Africa, are more mature and are valued higher than other countries due to large investments by foreign investors and domestic pension funds.

Price risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to a change in market prices (other than those arising from interest rate risk or currency risk), whether those changes are caused by factors specific to the individual financial instrument or its issuer, or factors affecting similar financial instruments traded in the market.

Coal companies have lost more than 90 percent of their value since the global coal bubble in 2011, and many companies have declared bankruptcy due to collapsing demand, oversupply on the international market, cheap natural gas prices, and new environmental regulations.

The volatility in the cryptocurrency market is a subject of hot debate due to the value of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies fluctuating to percentages of anywhere from 10 to even 50 percent in less than 24 hours.

Due to the volatility of the real estate market, the current value of your home could be much different than it was six months ago.

Because of the wide divergence of values produced via due process by appraisers of dubious hands - on feeling for the market or for value other than that which they could only produce via number crunching via approved methods without any experiential, common - sense «feel» for the value of real estate.

I was totally unaware that I had a «marketing» problem until you brought up the subject, other than the age of my site (which by the way apparently has some SEO value due to its age).

I just listed a property at a little over what I considered to be market value, showed it personally three times to the first person to enquire about it, suggested to that person that if interested (I knew she was... very), due to my honest, up - front presentation of said property, that she was free to offer through any agent / brokerage (other than me / mine) in order for her to feel comfortable with how her offer would be dealt with.