Sentences with phrase «than most people believe»

Again the risk is rising interest rates, which I believe will be a lot less than most people believe.

Fortunately, life insurance costs far less than most people believe it does.

While I also agree that the actual evidence of either of these issues is MUCH weaker than most people believe, I do not think that attribution is really the key issue at all.

«The issues the economy is facing are worse than most people believe,» Mozilo said in an interview last Friday with Bloomberg News.

6) The economic cycle across the world is usually more correlated than most people believe at any given point in time, even in ancient times.

If the «quality» of our children has really deteriorated so much, we as a nation are in much more trouble than most people believe.

With a large share of the population convinced that schools and teachers should be given more money, or at least be held harmless, few if any interest groups or politicians have an incentive to dramatize the fact that spending levels and teacher salaries are much higher than most people believe.

Finally, bananas are also very good sources of vitamin C, an antioxidant that supports immunity, and they're actually lower in sugar content than most people believe (less than an apple, actually).

Co-sleeping is more common in the United States than most people believe it to be, but parents who co-sleep aren't all that quick to talk about their choice because, well, being judged isn't very much fun.

Finally, bananas are also very good sources of vitamin C, an antioxidant that supports immunity, and they're actually lower in sugar content than most people believe (less than an apple, actually).

It helps that Alberta's labour market is far more diversified by industry than most people believe, meaning it is able to adapt more quickly to shocks like the oil crash.

The Angels are a better team than most people believed, including me, especially if Ohtani is legit.

Not exact matches

Thiel's support for anti-aging research is perhaps the most extreme manifestation of his being a «definite optimist» — a person who, as Thiel defines the term in Zero to One, believes «the future will be better than the present if he plans and works to make it better.»

That money left over is profit, which, rather than being hoarded by greedy capitalists as some in the media and the business community would have you believe, is most effectively used by reinvestment in product and people.

I really believe that you can microtest a business idea in a way that's less difficult and risky than most people think.»

«NIU has some mind share farther outside the confines of Illinois than most people would believe.

Here is the bottom line as far as I can see: IF you are self - employed when filing for early retirement, and *** if, on your application, you are asked how many hours you work *** (and I would like to hear from anybody here who has actually filed for benefits before their Full Retirement Age) and IF you work more than the allowable hours to be considered «retired» (again, I believe it's no more than 45 for most people but no more than 15 if you work at an occupation requiring a «specific skill» or own a large business),

I am happy that the writer had the choices that she did... She is also free to decide whether or not she is a Catholic... She however, took an available medication for a health problem... most Catholic facilities recognize such health problems and allow for that treatment... I am completly puzzled, though, that she would not want other Catholics to be able to choose differently than she did... for those people who wish to use contraceptive services and medication, options are open to them... I am not Catholic, did not grow up in a faith based family, and don't know whether a God exists or not... However, to leave a relgious group with no option but to contradict its own tenets is an attempt by those who don't believe in those tenents to mock them, certainly, but more to erode them... this seems the aim of many and when those folks operate from inside the government... that intrusion is an overreach of the govenrment...

Besides, Jesus discussed hell far more than he discussed heaven, and most Christian do believe it because the bible discusses it as a real place for real people on real pages in real scripture verses.

Most people want to believe that this nation is nothing more than the product of good ol hard work and determination.

The most hotly debated issue in connection with the 1983 Rules, in fact, was whether a lawyer should be required, rather than merely permitted, to disclose information he has reason to believe necessary to prevent a client from causing death or serious bodily harm to another person.

Over 2/3 of people believe in something other than the most popular God (Jesus).

Faith is a kind of delusion, but most people are not criminally insane, no more than most children who believe in Santa Claus.

Most people believe that there were no other revealed books than those three and the Qur» an.

As psychiatrist Frieda Fromm - Reichmann once put it, «Unless one believes and feels that the most regressed catatonic, on the back ward of the mental hospital, is more alike than different from oneself, one will be of little help to the mentally ill person.»

I have a much different understanding of who / what He is than what most people believe.

Most people are more concerned with their own troubles than with Christian faith, more eager to know what to do than what to believe particularly if the believing requires rigorous thinking.

Outside the rarified environs of the high academy and the fever swamps of animal rights advocacy, most people in the West believe that the lives of all human beings — not just the «normal» ones — are worth more than animals», simply because they are human.

That most people believe in gods is no more evidence for the existence of gods than the belief that the earth was flat is evidence for its shape.

There are some cultural things going on here with the act of baptism, and the fact that family members and servants usually followed the religion of the head of their household, but again, the most straightforward way of reading these texts is that more than one person believed, and those that did believe were baptized.

Because we ministers rightly believe that involvement in the reconciling process is a central task, we are more reluctant than most people to step back when, at least for the time being, the initial conditions for that process are not present.

Now you may not be saying what I believe you are saying, and you can correct me, but I think that it is more / most important to have faith and hope and share it with people, than doing away with truth for the sake of love.

Most «spiritual, but not religious» people I know (and I was one for a while myself) do believe in some sort of higher, constructive, organizing, power than themselves.

You see people who try and disprove God are only tickling your ears they don't have solid evidence only their words and their equations of age using carbon dating if you actually look up whats involved in carbon dating you will see that it's the same as flipping a coin the fossil record has many many holes in it more than most people who believe in evolution will admit.

Believe it or not, most people of faith, however that may be defined, get along much better than they're often given credit for.

What if you spend all your life thinking your «father» loves you more than the people of the «false religions», and praying to this God of Love who you also believe is going to punish most of His children eternally for not believing right?

Considering his condition is likely what allowed him to spend most of his time thinking and doing physics, thus making him one of the world's most well respected physicists and living far longer with ALS than any other individual before him, and is still able to communicate, I would imagine Maire is correct and he is an atheist not because he is all that bitter, but because the further people tend to go in science, the less they tend to believe in religion.

People have been tortured and died for causes they believed in that either failed or were actually nonexistent, just because the early christ followers did this does not mean the idea of jesus being the messiah holds any more weight than Simon Bar Kokhba, who still has followers in Israel and has never been found, which most take to mean that he ascended to heaven and he never died.

I too believe in acceptance and love for those who are different than I am (and listen, I'm pretty different, probably like most people).

I believe that people, poor as they were by our standards, had more control over their own lives in those days than is possible today for most workers, especially in the developing countries.

I second that, I believe the what people call «fundamental» today is anything but, fundamentalism wasn't a bad thing (just a few simple beliefs) but now it's become way too complex to be fundamental, I mean some of the most complex stuff on earth (DNA) is simpler than today's «fundamentalists»

prayer does work, but atheism is much healthier than ANY of the major religions... atheist don't force people into believing the way they do... and condemn them to hell fire if they don't... most if not all Christian religions do... Buddhism is a much better way to view the earth and it's people...

I think most religions require people to «really» believe — not just play pretent in order to hedge against potential hellfire... but other than that, nice plan.

In most veins of the Christian faith, it would seem far more beneficial and pleasant to believe in the Christian god than to disbeleve — unless you are the type of person to worry about the eternal fate of others over the fate of yourself.

- people believe the Savior is named «Jesus» and remain unsaved... - that Jesus» name really isn't «Jesus» He was never called «Jesus» in His life... - most people don't know the meaning of the name «Jesus»... - you say a person does not need to know ANYTHING about «Jesus» (e.g., that He is a man, that He is God, that He died for sins and rose again, that He isn't a Mexican somewhere in Tiajuana)-- other than that this guy is the guarantor of eternal life by faith alone... - you discount passages that say the lost are saved by the «preaching of the cross» (1Cor.

I am (a) A victim of child molestation (b) A r.ape victim trying to recover (c) A mental patient with paranoid delusions (d) A Christian The only discipline known to often cause people to kill others they have never met and / or to commit suicide in its furtherance is: (a) Architecture; (b) Philosophy; (c) Archeology; or (d) Religion What is it that most differentiates science and all other intellectual disciplines from religion: (a) Religion tells people not only what they should believe, but what they are morally obliged to believe on pain of divine retribution, whereas science, economics, medicine etc. has no «sacred cows» in terms of doctrine and go where the evidence leads them; (b) Religion can make a statement, such as «there is a composite god comprised of God the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit», and be totally immune from experimentation and challenge, whereas science can only make factual assertions when supported by considerable evidence; (c) Science and the scientific method is universal and consistent all over the World whereas religion is regional and a person's religious conviction, no matter how deeply held, is clearly nothing more than an accident of birth; or (d) All of the above.

But assuming they are wrong, it only proves there is a large group of people out in the world still that want desperately to believe in something greater than themselves and, most importantly, care enough about others to sacrifice of their own comforts to make sure others at least know about it and can decide for themselves.

I tend to believe I allow more time for packing than most people (I'm puzzled when I hear someone telling me they just throw random stuff in a suitcase an hour before their flight).

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

Speaking of loyalty in professional football, many people have different opinions about it but I am not here to lecture anyone on loyalty or disloyalty... I am pretty sure that many of us will agree that Arsene Wenger is one of the most loyal managers in the world as he is loyal to a fault, in fact, many believe that his loyalty has caused more harm than good to the club....