«but I see no valid evidence that it is a cause of positive rather
than negative feedback.»
Yes, overall change in clouds may be a positive feedback, rather
than a negative feedback assumed from simple ideas like more water - > more clouds - > cooling.
Online reviews aren't always 100 percent accurate, but it can at least give you a frame of reference, especially if the mortgage company has more positive
than negative feedback.
A negative comment about the product in the form of a review is typically less impactful to the seller
than a negative feedback.
Our advice is choosing the sites that have more positive
than negative feedbacks.
Most AGW results from positive feedbacks, and it is my impression that positive feedbacks have longer lags
than negative feedbacks.
In the microphone - amplifier - speaker correspondence the tipping point is the point when you turn the volume a little big up and then the positive feedbacks are stronger
than the negative feedbacks and you get that horrible noise.
Not exact matches
In a Psychology Today article, psychologist Leslie Becker - Phelps advises paying more attention to positive
feedback than to
negative responses.
I've heard no more
than yes and I've seen people take
negative feedback and give up on an idea.
But most people tend to focus on the
negative rather
than the positive, and businesses are no different: they spend the majority of their time addressing customer complaints and
negative feedback.
Pages that posted even less frequently
than a post per week got 1.82 %
negative feedback out of all the interactions.
In my experience men seem to receive more constructive
feedback, positive or
negative,
than women, who either get «ah, that was lovely dear!»
Modern society does not have much in the way of positive
feedback for those who go against the religious grain, so
negative feedback is more prevalent
than not.
Also, I want these excellent videos to be spread around the net, and I've received much, much, much more positive
feedback than negative..
Most parents find that it is easier to provide
negative feedback rather
than positive
feedback.
Picking your baby up every time they cry will likely get you some
negative feedback from more
than a few friends and family members, though.
Accepting
negative feedback gratefully and gracefully is harder said
than done, but nonetheless an opportunity for growth as a parent and human being.
Although most customers are not happy with its 15inches long size and gave
negative feedback to this insert, it still made it to our list due to the fact that it cost half less
than other inserts yet does the same job.
Moreover, experiments suggest that people learn better from positive
feedback than from
negative feedback, and this may be especially true for kids (Schmittmann et al 2006; van Duijvenvoorde et al 2008).
Positive
feedback is a much more important tool
than making
negative statements.
If kids receive a
negative feedback and invalidation rather
than encouragement, they try new things and quit the things when the things become too difficult.
In other words, in the context of nearly continuous
negative attention, the University has not persuaded its critics (from within and outside the University) that it is interested in more
than protecting its reputation and that it is instead open to
feedback, able to acknowledge its errors, and will take responsibility for deficiencies and their consequences.»
Does it mean that menopausal women who use HRT to replace ovarian hormones (thereby reinstituting
negative feedback onto GnRH) may expect to live shorter lives
than women who don't?
I'm not even an amateur climate scientist, but my logic tells me that if clouds have a stronger
negative feedback in the Arctic, and I know (from news) the Arctic is warming faster
than other areas, then it seems «forcing GHGs» (CO2, etc) may have a strong sensitivity
than suggested, but this is suppressed by the cloud effect.
Bounoua L., F. G. Hall, P. J. Sellers, A. Kumar, G. J. Collatz, C. J. Tucker, and M. L. Imhoff, 2010, Quantifying the
negative feedback of vegetation to greenhouse warming: A modeling approach, Geophysical Research Letters, 37 This one finds that the doubling of the Carbon Dioxide concentration may be less serious
than the IPCC predicts
[Response: It would require the
negative feedbacks to be much stronger
than they are.
If more heat is transferred to the oceans
than is accounted for by the models, that «is a
negative atmospheric
feedback, at least on shorter time scales.»
First - and second - grade students in 1993 who had been kept out of kindergarten until they were older were less likely
than other students to draw
negative feedback from teachers about their academic performance or conduct in class.
And there is no better
feedback than the
negative results from personal mistakes and folly.
Other
than that, we could not find any other
negative feedback.
Negative feedback, Chen explained, is no less stimulating
than positive
feedback, especially as it relates to game design.
However, sea ice then grows very rapidly, since the growth rate for thin ice is much higher
than for thick ice, which acts as a
negative feedback on thickness during the growth season (Bitz and Roe, 2004; Notz, 2009).
... Specifically, the decadal cloud
feedback between the 1980s and 2000s is substantially more
negative than the long - term cloud
feedback.
Olympus Mons, What it would take is a new model that explained climate better
than the current one and a) had a CO2 sensitivity lower
than 1 degree per doubling; or b) had a large
negative feedback that somehow kicked in right at the current terrestrial temperature range; or c) had a mechanism whereby CO2 suddenly stopped being a greenhouse gas at 280 ppmv
Is TC saying that increased fertilization due to CO2 is going to act as a
negative feedback of sufficient magnitude that the problem of anthropogenic emissions is smaller
than generally believed?
If anything, there is more of a chance of a large positive
feedback than a large
negative feedback.
David Benson, Based solely on the fact that Earth was 33 degrees warmer
than its blackbody temperature, on what was known of the absorption spectrum of CO2 and on the fact that Earth's climate did not exhibit exceptional stability characteristic of systems with
negative feedback, I'd probably still go with restricting CO2 sensitivity to 0 to + infinity.
These would probably be
negative feedbacks, making the relaxation toward equilibrium somewhat faster
than I got.
This is larger
than 1 K, but it is still finite, indicating a stable climate (including the Planck response as a
feedback, the net
feedback is
negative, but smaller
than if it were only the Planck response).
Once the ice reaches the equator, the equilibrium climate is significantly colder
than what would initiate melting at the equator, but if CO2 from geologic emissions build up (they would, but very slowly — geochemical processes provide a
negative feedback by changing atmospheric CO2 in response to climate changes, but this is generally very slow, and thus can not prevent faster changes from faster external forcings) enough, it can initiate melting — what happens then is a runaway in the opposite direction (until the ice is completely gone — the extreme warmth and CO2 amount at that point, combined with left - over glacial debris available for chemical weathering, will draw CO2 out of the atmosphere, possibly allowing some ice to return).
The loss of the GBR WILL IMPACT and directly effect more
than just QLDers where they live, but will have
negative feedbacks downstream to the rest of this nation and many other nations as well as a result.
This is what I get out of it: the Arctic - ice - albedo situation is more complicated
than earlier thought (due to clouds, sun - filled summers, dark winters, etc), but NET EFFECT, the ice loss and all these other related factors (some
negative feedbacks) act as a positive
feedback and enhance global warming.
And, as the satellite observations of Spencer and Braswell showed, as the planet warms over a period of several months, clouds act as a net
negative feedback (the reflecting low - altitude clouds increase more
than the absorbing high - altitude clouds with warming).
As noted above, if the planet resists forcing changes (
negative feedback) rather
than amplifies forcing changes (positive
feedback), then the explanation (only physical possible explanation) for cyclic abrupt climate changes is there is a very, very, powerful forcing mechanism.
Other studies indicate that models with strongly positive low - cloud
feedback are more consistent with observations
than models with weakly positive or
negative feedback (Qu et al. 2014, 2015b, Myers and Norris 2016).
July 17, 2013 at 1:39 pm The lapse rate
feedback is only a
negative feedback (in the general circulation model) if the long wave radiation that is released when the water vapour condenses is emitted to space rather
than trapped by increased water vapour.
That really would be Climate Change ™ Luckily, Gaia and her
negative feedback mechanisms are smarter
than all the climate scientists and their models put together.
It appears to me that the new «scientific evidence» is suggesting that water vapor
feedback is not as strong as had been estimated by the models previously and that net cloud
feedback may be neutral to slightly
negative, rather
than strongly positive, as predicted previously by the models.
Cumulus clouds will have the same effect, but more in balance with the positive effects, resulting in less
negative net
feedback, but with the same result, much lower climate sensitivity
than the IPCC would have you believe.I realize that climate sensitivity is not usually discussed as a local phenomenon, but it should be, since it is the integral of all local phenomena.
Very few scientists are arguing that the
feedbacks may be more
negative than currently indicated in the science.