Think about that for a moment: Once you take retirements into account, as you should, we got more new solar last year
than new coal + new gas + new nuclear.
However, natural gas and wind are both already cheaper
than new coal - fired power plants, even without the new EPA regulations.
Now that renewable energy sources like solar and PV are cheaper
than new coal - fired power stations in most jurisdictions (anywhere with either favorable conditions or a reasonable carbon price), the big remaining question is that of supply variability / intermittency.
If leakage is higher than 3 percent, there are some periods in the next 30 years when gas will result in more climate impact
than new coal plants.
They emit much more CO2 than the CCGT, and are only marginally better
than new coal plants.
Since power from new renewables is cheaper than power from existing coal and nuclear, it's no surprise that the lifetime cost of new renewables is much cheaper
than new coal and nuclear power.
However even without a carbon price (the most efficient way to reduce economy - wide emissions) wind energy is 14 % cheaper
than new coal and 18 % cheaper than new gas.»
New wind power is now cheaper per megawatt - hour
than new coal - or gas - fired electricity generation, but renewable energy still needs subsidies to compete with existing generators.
Wind is now cheaper
than new coal, which is why it's had such a dominant position in terms of new installed capacity for a while now.
The world added more solar capacity in 2017
than all new coal, gas and nuclear electricity - generating plants combined.
THE world added more solar capacity in 2017
than all new coal, gas and nuclear electricity - generating plants combined.
Not exact matches
The fossil fuel divestment campaign began on university campuses in 2011 but the
new report reveals that concerns over investments in
coal, oil and gas have now entered the financial mainstream, with more
than 80 % of the funds now committed to divest being managed by commercial investment and pension funds.
RICHMOND, Va. (AP)-- Dominion Energy Virginia said Tuesday that it plans to build at least eight
new natural gas - fired plants during the next 15 years, cementing its shift away from
coal, while depending on renewables for less
than 10 percent of its energy capacity.
Regulations that affect proposed
new coal plants in the U.S. are therefore likely to have a larger overall impact on GHG emissions
than Canadian regulations.
The U.S. generates over 1.7 million megawatt hours from
coal - fired power, compared to less
than 100,000 megawatt hours in Canada, and U.S.
coal generation is expected to remain roughly constant through 2040 absent any
new regulations.
OTTAWA — The federal Liberal government says its
new regulations to phase out power plants fired by
coal and natural gas will cost more
than $ 2.2 billion, but potentially save the country billions more in reduced health care costs.
«On rooftops from Arizona to
New York, solar is saving Americans tens of millions of dollars a year on their energy bills, and employs more Americans
than coal — in jobs that pay better
than average.»
New electricity from solar and wind will be cheaper than coal in most parts of the United States by 2023, according to a new
New electricity from solar and wind will be cheaper
than coal in most parts of the United States by 2023, according to a
newnew...
Solar power might be an undeniable part of our future — the industry created double the amount of jobs as
coal did last year and accounts for nearly 40 % of
new electric capacity added to the grid, more
than wind or even natural gas — but SolarCity itself isn't.
Solar created one out of every 50
new jobs in the U.S. last year, and the sector now employs more Americans
than coal.
Maxwell Ball, manager for clean
coal technologies at SaskPower in Regina, which owns the plant, says that the company was surprised to learn that it would be cheaper in the long term to keep burning
coal at Boundary Dam and sell the carbon dioxide to oil companies to boost production in the oil field
than to build a
new natural - gas plant.
After the public soured on nuclear power following Japan's 2011 Fukushima disaster, a previous administration even decided to build
new coal - fired power plants rather
than turn to renewable energy, Yun says.
Despite widespread concern about potential human health impacts from hydraulic fracturing, the lifetime toxic chemical releases associated with
coal - generated electricity are 10 to 100 times greater
than those from electricity generated with natural gas obtained via fracking, according to a
new University of Michigan study.
In the short term,
new gas - fired power stations can help cut emissions, but only if they replace existing
coal - fired power stations rather
than nuclear plants or renewable energy sources.
The Department of Energy estimated in May 2007 that a
new power plant burning pulverized
coal and equipped with amine scrubbers to capture 90 percent of the CO2 would make electricity at a cost of more
than $ 114 per megawatt - hour (compared with just $ 63 per MWh without CO2 capture).
More
than 100 gigawatts of geothermal power (one tenth of the current U.S. electrical generation) could be developed for $ 1 billion during the next 40 years — at the full cost of one carbon - capturing
coal - fired power plant or one - third the cost of a
new nuclear generator.
Coal - powered synthetic natural gas plants being planned in China would produce seven times more greenhouse gas emissions
than conventional natural gas plants, and use up to 100 times the water as shale gas production, according to a
new study by Duke University researchers.
The analysis by Yang and Jackson finds that if the gas produced by the
new plants is used to generate electricity, the total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions would be 36 percent to 82 percent higher
than pulverized
coal - fired power.
Coal - powered synthetic natural gas plants being planned in China would produce seven times more greenhouse gas emissions
than conventional natural gas plants, and use up to 100 times the water as shale gas production, according to a
new study.
For example, China gets about 20 per cent of its imported
coal from Australia, but more
than half of what Australia sends might not meet the
new standards.
Google will funnel some of its profits into a
new effort, dubbed RE < C (for renewable energy cheaper
than coal, as Google translates it) to make sources such as solar - thermal, high - altitude wind and geothermal cheaper
than coal «within years, not decades,» according to Weihl.
It's less costly to get electricity from wind turbines and solar panels
than coal - fired power plants when climate change costs and other health impacts are factored in, according to a
new study published in Springer's Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.
A
new study finds that methane emissions from shale gas production are nearly 50 times lower
than previous estimates, improving the climate benefit of switching from
coal to natural gas.
A
new study suggests that more methane is leaking
than the U.S. government estimates — but natural gas remains less polluting
than coal
Further, Chinese officials have announced plans to explicitly cap China's total energy use at four billion metric tons of
coal - equivalent by 2015; they also have drafted a «
New Energy Industry Development Plan» that would invest amore than $ 750 billion in «new energy,» which includes nuclear, in the next deca
New Energy Industry Development Plan» that would invest amore
than $ 750 billion in «
new energy,» which includes nuclear, in the next deca
new energy,» which includes nuclear, in the next decade.
Forty years of mountaintop
coal mining have made parts of Central Appalachia 60 percent flatter
than they were before excavation, says
new research by Duke University.
The «well - to - wire» research showed
new natural - gas power plants are responsible for less
than half as much greenhouse gas per kilowatt hour of electricity generated as existing
coal power plants.
«If there is substantial natural gas leakage, then building
new natural gas plants would lead to more near term climate damage
than using the old dirty
coal plants,» explained Caldeira.
The study also found that, although transmitting
coal power was slightly more effective at reducing air pollution impacts
than simply replacing old
coal power plants with
newer, cleaner ones in the east, both
coal scenarios had approximately the same carbon emissions.
Natural gas might still have an advantage over
coal when burned to create electricity, because gas - fired power plants tend to be
newer and far more efficient
than older facilities that provide the bulk of the country's
coal - fired generation.
As rumored, EPA will require that all
new natural gas - fired plants emit no more
than 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt - hour, and
coal plants no more
than 1,100 pounds per megawatt - hour.
The
new reductions will bring
coal use in the city to less
than 7 million tons this year, down from around 22 million tons in 2013
Though burning natural gas produces much less greenhouse gas emissions
than burning
coal, a
new study indicates switching over
coal - fired power plants to natural gas would have a negligible effect on the changing climate.
Most
new coal - fired power plants are more efficient
than the older technologies that used to be standard equipment.
That is only slightly less
than pending
new capacity in China, the world's reigning king of
coal (ClimateWire, Sept. 17, 2012).
In September 2013, the EPA proposed
new standards for
coal - fired plants that are significantly more stringent
than existing standards.
Commercially, plants using «clean
coal» technology can be more attractive
than new reactors, says the company in its submission to the government's review of the nuclear industry.
We also discuss what's going on in
New Mexico with renewable energy, work that offers a better response to meeting people's energy needs and also is better environmentally and more affordable
than nuclear power — or
coal, oil, and natural gas that also play major roles in
New Mexico.
In Ohio, the state has granted permits to mine for
coal at
new and existing sites ranging from less
than 20 acres to more
than 350.
A version of this article appears in print on November 4, 2015, on Page A1 of the
New York edition with the headline: China Is Burning Much More
Coal Than It Claimed.