On Saturday, for example, Amazon announced that on Christmas Day its customers bought more Kindle books
than physical books for the first time ever.
Customers purchased more Kindle books
than physical books for the first time on Christmas Day, Amazon said.
Further, e-books * ARE * worth less
than physical books for the very fact that they are not physical.
Your fingers actually rest perfectly between the middle fold of the back grooves, making it easier to hold
than a physical book for long periods of time.
Not exact matches
There is a lot of farcical chin - pulling in the
book over various «possible candidates
for nothingness» and «what «nothing» might actually comprise,» along with an earnest insistence that any «definition» of nothingness must ultimately be «based on empirical evidence» and that ««nothing» is every bit as
physical as «something»» — as if «nothingness» were a highly unusual kind of stuff that is more difficult to observe or measure
than other things are.
But as E. A. Burtt noted over half a century ago in his classic
book The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern
Physical Science, the thinker who claims to eschew philosophy in favor of science is constantly tempted «to make a metaphysics out of his method,» trying to define reality as what his preferred techniques can measure rather
than letting reality dictate what techniques are appropriate
for studying it.
Tolstoy,
for instance, is an epic writer, whose
books overflow with
physical details and frequently threaten to overflow their own narrative structures and become as vast and as inconclusive as life itself, while Dostoevsky is a dramatic writer, whose
books are full of fraught and urgent voices, at times almost disembodied, trapped in situations of immediate and pressing crisis, and surrounded by a
physical world usually having no more substance
than a collection of painted canvasses or pasteboard silhouettes at the back of the stage.
But it is actually less a contribution to critical theory
than a continuation of several themes from earlier
books, including the search
for a metaphor or bridge from the self to the
physical world.
I think established authors who have some following can easily charge more
for their
books, although I still belong to the group of people who'd rather hold a
physical copy of a
book rather
than an ebook, if I am able to:).
You must set your Digital
Book's List Price (and change it from time - to - time if necessary) so that it is no higher
than the list price in any sales channel
for any
physical edition of the Digital
Book.
The fact that buyers at Amazon are now buying Kindle
books at a rate that's already three times faster
than they did
for the same period is pretty astonishing, and the fact that sales now beat
physical books is a huge sign of the change in reading habits.
As a result, Amazon would seem to have less room
for error
than Apple, and while it has plenty of high - margin products to sell in the form of accessories, the rumored mix of Kindle devices and
physical books doesn't seem incredibly enticing, especially when prices
for Kindles are so low (that's the stuff you don't mind buying online) and only going lower.
@BBU In Amazon's KDP pricing page linked from their Terms and Conditions the state: «You must set your Digital
Book's List Price (and change it from time - to - time if necessary) so that it is no higher than the list price in any sales channel for any digital or physical edition of the Digital Book... By «list price in any sales channel,» we (Amazon) mean the suggested or recommended retail price or, if you sell your book directly to end users, your own sales price, for an edition of the book available outside of our Program.&ra
Book's List Price (and change it from time - to - time if necessary) so that it is no higher
than the list price in any sales channel
for any digital or
physical edition of the Digital
Book... By «list price in any sales channel,» we (Amazon) mean the suggested or recommended retail price or, if you sell your book directly to end users, your own sales price, for an edition of the book available outside of our Program.&ra
Book... By «list price in any sales channel,» we (Amazon) mean the suggested or recommended retail price or, if you sell your
book directly to end users, your own sales price, for an edition of the book available outside of our Program.&ra
book directly to end users, your own sales price,
for an edition of the
book available outside of our Program.&ra
book available outside of our Program.»
of all
book sales in the U.S., and with more
than 60 % of all units (print and eBook) being sold via an online retailer, it's become increasingly easy to create a digital
book and toss it into the marketplace, without the need
for a
physical product or a third - party publisher.
With eBooks accounting
for 30 - 35 % of all
book sales in the U.S., and with more
than 60 % of all units (print and eBook) being sold via an online retailer, it's become increasingly easy to create a digital
book and toss it into the marketplace, without the need
for a
physical product or a third - party publisher.
At
physical bookstores, if I found less
than three or four
books I was interested in buying, I'd make a second or third trip down the aisles looking
for more
books.
This partnership with the Integrated Library System will let users browse both
for physical and digital editions, making finding a great
book to borrow even easier
than before.
10 dollars is absolutely absurd when you can get them
for free in
physical form at a library, not to mention used
books stores where they cost less
than 3 dollars at times..
i've seen
physical books sell
for less
than an ebook.
Said to be designed
for comfort and extended reading, the Kindle Oasis is 30 % thinner on average and over 20 % lighter
than previous versions and includes a
physical design that is made to shift the center of gravity to the reader's palm, resting in the hand like the spine of a
book, creating balance
for one - handed reading.
The actual
physical costs of a print
book — paper, printing, binding, packaging, warehousing, etc. — are less
than 10 % of the cover price, even in small volumes, and drop to less
than a dollar per
book for large volume titles such as bestsellers.
As
for physical books, I believe they will remain but I believe that self - publishing will make the route to a best - seller more circuitous
than it's ever been because there may not be agents / publishers willing to represent / publish an author unless the self - published product has sold more
than «x» number of
books.
Looking at it from the outside it seems the only likely reason
for making the ebook cost more
than a print
book is to push readers towards
physical books instead of digital.
Here in Australia paying the prices the publishers are currently charging is often still on par or better
than what I'd be paying
for a new
physical book.
As the parent company over two distinctly different methods of independent publishing — CreateSpace
for print - on - demand
physical books and Kindle Direct Publishing
for ebooks — the opportunities
for book development are more available
than ever.
If you opt
for picture
books, I hope you will get
physical books rather
than eBooks.
For me, my opinion started to change when I thought of ebooks as an alternative, rather
than a replacement, to
physical books.
(Even demand
for physical books can be likened to customers choosing to boxed or CD / DVD version of a program rather
than a download.
24 people tried out the Kindle and iPad
for 17 minutes each and then an expert made the assumption that their observations are the holy grail and that «reading speed on the Kindle is slower
than on
physical books».
Since consumers almost always have the option to read
books in
physical formats, they are indicating a preference to return to print... Overall, 14 % of
book buyers said they are now reading fewer e-
books than when they started reading
books in the format, and 59 % percent of those who said they are reading fewer e-
books cited a preference
for print as the main reason
for switching back to
physical books.
The release immediately continues, «On Christmas Day,
for the first time ever, customers purchased more Kindle
books than physical books.»
Unless one is a huge name, we have reached the point where publishers do nothing
for their authors other
than put the
physical books together and toss them out into the universe.
When you combine this with the fact that «owning» a «new» file has less value
for most people
than owning a new
physical book, you can see the potential
for more, perhaps many more, people to shift from buying to borrowing especially if borrowing is free.
For the first time ever, more eBooks were sold on Christmas Day
than physical books.
Barnes & Noble now represents more
than 25 percent of all of the U.S. market
for e-
books, more
than the company's share of
physical books, and it sells twice the number of e-
books as
physical books, at least online.
The biggest news to come from that press release was the fact Amazon's Kindle and Kindle
books were the biggest sellers, wherein Kindle
books sold more on Christmas day
than their
physical counterparts - which honestly makes a whole lot more sense then people are giving credit
for.
I did a side - by - side test, and the K3's page turns are a little faster, but this is honestly a non-issue
for me, as the K2 is plenty fast enough anyway — faster
than turning a page in a
physical book.
If I was able to buy an e-
book once
for both of us, like I can
for a
physical book, then e-books would make an awful lot more sense
than they do now.
So, while an ebook might have less value to you
than a
physical book, there are definitely specific classes of
books (i.e. those that I read as disposable entertainment)
for which an ebook has greater value to me.
The firm accounts
for less
than a quarter of
physical book sales (see box).
While nothing is quite like the experience of turning the pages of a
physical book, we're seeing more and more requests
for digital review copies rather
than their printed brethren.
To the public library, of course — a place which offers more
than just
physical books on shelves, by the way (programs
for toddlers and young adults, literacy programs, workshops
for job searchers and senior citizens, free community meeting spaces, etc.).
If he did (and had a better memory
than I), he would recall my entry from last January 5th where I discussed Amazon's silly press statement: «On Christmas Day,
for the first time ever, customers purchased more Kindle
books than physical books.»
For example, promotions on children's
books do not perform well (the ROI was -39 %), probably because most parents (like me) buy
physical books rather
than e-
books.
The waiting thing sounds well and good but if they're going to go from 14.99 down to the 9.99 they are now, I could just go on half.com or ebay or anywhere that sells used
books (or the library, I know, a crazy idea) and get the
physical copy
for less
than it would be on my kindle now.
However, it's particularly galling
for books because it's the first change
for physical books and fundamentally
books don't need anything more
than words on a surface.
Since e-book readers can store thousands of
books, they eliminate the need
for physical storage and give children, parents and schools access to a much wider selection
books than what may be physically available in their communities.
As reported by The Guardian, «HarperCollins» revenues from
physical books were down 6 % over the last 12 months, although digital sales are expanding robustly and now account
for more
than one fifth of sales... expects demand
for ebooks to continue to grow before plateauing at roughly 50 % of all
book sales.»
Amazon announced earlier this year that it is now selling more digital
books than physical books, and Barclays» DiClemente said the company's Kindle reading device was the catalyst
for that shift.
Of course, buying
physical books is still the best option
for many bookworms out there, in part because nothing can replace the sheer tactical feeling of flipping through pages, but jumping into e-
books is more
than decent a recourse.