Sentences with phrase «than planned hospital»

A meta - analysis of observational studies have suggested that planned home birth may be safe and with less interventions than planned hospital birth.

Especially when the research we have is very clear that, when set up properly, this option is even safer for low - risk pregnancies than a planned hospital birth.

Planned home births are less risky than planned hospital births, particularly for second - time mothers, says research in the British Medical Journal.

I would love to see a study that compares the rates of trauma sustained between PLANNED homebirth and PLANNED hospital birth — I'd be willing to bet that planned homebirth is actually more likely to be traumatic than planned hospital birth.

Here is a BBC article that finds home birth less risky than a planned hospital birth.

Not exact matches

Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: our ability to achieve our financial, strategic and operational plans or initiatives; our ability to predict and manage medical costs and price effectively and develop and maintain good relationships with physicians, hospitals and other health care providers; the impact of modifications to our operations and processes; our ability to identify potential strategic acquisitions or transactions and realize the expected benefits of such transactions, including with respect to the Merger; the substantial level of government regulation over our business and the potential effects of new laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations; the outcome of litigation, regulatory audits, investigations, actions and / or guaranty fund assessments; uncertainties surrounding participation in government - sponsored programs such as Medicare; the effectiveness and security of our information technology and other business systems; unfavorable industry, economic or political conditions, including foreign currency movements; acts of war, terrorism, natural disasters or pandemics; our ability to obtain shareholder or regulatory approvals required for the Merger or the requirement to accept conditions that could reduce the anticipated benefits of the Merger as a condition to obtaining regulatory approvals; a longer time than anticipated to consummate the proposed Merger; problems regarding the successful integration of the businesses of Express Scripts and Cigna; unexpected costs regarding the proposed Merger; diversion of management's attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities during the pendency of the Merger; potential litigation associated with the proposed Merger; the ability to retain key personnel; the availability of financing, including relating to the proposed Merger; effects on the businesses as a result of uncertainty surrounding the proposed Merger; as well as more specific risks and uncertainties discussed in our most recent report on Form 10 - K and subsequent reports on Forms 10 - Q and 8 - K available on the Investor Relations section of www.cigna.com as well as on Express Scripts» most recent report on Form 10 - K and subsequent reports on Forms 10 - Q and 8 - K available on the Investor Relations section of www.express-scripts.com.

(d) According to the plan, all existing state hospitals of more than one thousand beds should be gradually converted into centers for the care of chronically ill persons, both physically and mentally ill.

And so I learned that the hospital is not an evil place (though choose your hospital wisely if youâ $ ™ re planning to birth there), that I am stronger than I thought (I sort of want to cross-stitch â $ œ12 hours on pit with not pain medsâ $ into a pillow), and that even though it can sometimes appear as though they are, medical professionals are NOT the enemy (butâ $ ¦ do your research!

Another lengthy scan with very little discussion between the technician and us, again our worrying about our being steamrolled into a management plan without through evaluation of the risks and benefits, or being essentially pushed into a hospital birth because it would be best for the baby but also mean that I would not have the option of birthing vaginally was all a little more than my tear ducts could bear.

Several studies have shown that planned homebirth attended by a qualified experienced caregiver is as safe or safer than hospital birth for low - risk women.

while being coerced to push even though I wanted to breath the babies down, I didn't get to see them at all for 15 hours after they were born because the hospital staff didn't get their act together, not because it was medically necessary, etc., so much so that the head of OB (my office doc) later admitted they had me on suicide watch because what happened was so different than my birth plan... I wasn't stuck on exact details, especially because twins throw a loop in all of it, but it was nothing like I had hoped for, at all.

No matter that it comports with the data from Oregon that shows that PLANNED homebirth with a LICENSED homebirth midwife has a death rate 9X higher than comparable risk hospital birth or that MANA has found that its own members have such hideous death rates that they have been desperately hiding them for years.

«While most pregnant women who choose to have planned home births are at lower risk of complications due to careful screening, planned home births are associated with double to triple the risk of infant death than are planned hospital births.

The following quote from the article above puzzles me to no end: «The latest CDC figures (publicly available on the CDC Wonder website) show that planned homebirth with a non-nurse midwife has a mortality rate 600 % HIGHER than low risk hospital birth.»

The latest CDC figures (publicly available on the CDC Wonder website) show that planned homebirth with a non-nurse midwife has a mortality rate 600 % HIGHER than low risk hospital birth.

In yet another example of a strikingly robust finding, planned homebirth in NZ had more than triple the neonatal death rate of planned hospital birth.

Low risk women in primary care at the onset of labour with planned home birth had lower rates of severe acute maternal morbidity, postpartum haemorrhage, and manual removal of placenta than those with planned hospital birth.

As the recently released statistics from Oregon show, planned homebirth with a licensed homebirth midwife has a mortality rate 800 % HIGHER than term hospital birth.

It doesn't sound as though your situation was any different having a planned hospital birth than it would have been had you been planning a home birth.

If you are planning to use the milk in an area where more than one baby has milk stored (e.g. hospital or day care) them remember to write you baby's name on it.

The amended plan on the table Monday reduced the size of the fitness center, thus cutting parking spaces and sparing more than 60 trees that were close to a buffer zone between the hospital and the preserve.

Hospital grade breast pumps are a must if you plan to be gone more than 6 hours per day from your baby.

Conclusions: Low risk women in primary care at the onset of labour with planned home birth had lower rates of severe acute maternal morbidity, postpartum haemorrhage, and manual removal of placenta than those with planned hospital birth.

Planned homebirth with a licensed homebirth midwife in Oregon has a death rate 9X higher than term births in the hospital.

His book is a tinderbox that will infuriate both the pro-C-section lobbyists (babies born this way are five times more likely to suffer allergies he points out) and the natural birthers (infant death globally between birth and 28 days appears twice as high after planned homebirth than hospital birth).

We plan on having a process in place whereby we can ensure you get there asap, often resulting in little difference than the time you would be seen if you were in hospital.

I've used the CDC Wonder data from 2003 - 2008 to demonstrate that in each year, planned homebirth with a homebirth midwives has a neonatal death rate anywhere from 3 - 7X higher than hospital birth.

How can you trust that homebirth is safe when the most comprehensive study ever done of homebirth (and analyzed by a midwife) found that PLANNED homebirth with a LICENSED midwife has a death rate approximately 800 % higher than comparable risk hospital birth, and even MANA can't figure out how to criticize it?

The overall all rate of perinatal death at planned homebirth with a LICENSED midwife was 800 % higher than comparable risk hospital deaths.

The most recent large scale study comparing outcomes for mother and baby reported in the British Medical Journal last month showed that for women who had previously given birth, adverse outcomes were less common among planned home births (1 per 1,000) than among planned hospital births (2.3 per 1,000).

Note that the total mortality rate for births planned to be attended by direct - entry midwives is 6 - 8 times higher than the rate for births planned to be attended in hospitals.

When this 20 % risk of death is compared to the 0.02 % rate of cord prolapse during labor at homebirth that might have a better outcome if it happened in hospital, this means that a low risk woman has a 1000 times higher chance of having a life threatening complication either to her life or her fetus / newborns life at planned hospital birth, than if she plans to have an attended homebirth with a well - trained practitioner.

Oh, wait, maybe they do, and MANA is planning to release them now to say «hey, it isn't really 8x the rate, like the Oregon stats show, they are an awful anomaly, it is * only * 3x, and three is almost the same as one, so, ipso facto, as safe or safer than hospital birth.»

«The planned category of out - of - hospital births is seen to be a generally low - risk group for neonatal mortality, with very few low - birth - weight births and fewer teenage, low - educational levels and unwed mothers than found statewide, «the researchers said.

You have a higher chance of complications during labor and birth than a woman delivering a single baby, so you should plan to deliver in a hospital.

The odds of cesarean section among women planning out - of - hospital birth were lower among multiparous women than among nulliparous women and among women with 12 years of education or less than among women with more than 12 years of education (Figure 1).

Obstetrical procedures were more common among women who had planned in - hospital births than among women who delivered out of the hospital (30.4 % vs. 1.5 % for induction of labor and 26.4 % vs. 1.1 % for augmentation of labor, P < 0.001 for both comparisons)(Table 3).

Rates of obstetrical intervention are high in U.S. hospitals, and we found large absolute differences in the risks of these interventions between planned out - of - hospital births and in - hospital births.38 In contrast, serious adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes are infrequent in all the birth settings we assessed, and the absolute differences in risk that we observed between planned birth locations were correspondingly small; for example, planned out - of - hospital births were associated with an excess of less than 1 fetal death per 1000 deliveries in multivariate and propensity - score - adjusted analyses.

After hospital transfers were reclassified as belonging to the planned out - of - hospital birth category, the rate of fetal death was higher (though not quite reaching the level of significance) among out - of - hospital births than among in - hospital births (2.4 vs. 1.2 deaths per 1000 deliveries, P = 0.05)(Table 3).

The proportions of women who were white, had private insurance or paid out of pocket, or were of advanced maternal age were higher among women who planned out - of - hospital birth than among those who planned in - hospital birth (Table 1).

Similarly, rates of perinatal and neonatal death did not differ significantly before transfers were reclassified (P > 0.1 for all comparisons) but were higher in the case of planned out - of - hospital births than in the case of planned in - hospital births after reclassification (perinatal death, 3.9 vs. 1.8 deaths per 1000 deliveries, P = 0.003; neonatal death, 1.6 vs. 0.6 deaths per 1000 deliveries, P = 0.02).

An odds ratio of more than 1 indicates that the risk of the outcome is increased with planned out - of - hospital birth as compared with planned hospital birth.

Planned out - of - hospital birth was associated with a higher rate of perinatal death than was planned in - hospital birth (3.9 vs. 1.8 deaths per 1000 deliveries, P = 0.003; odds ratio after adjustment for maternal characteristics and medical conditions, 2.43; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.37 to 4.30; adjusted risk difference, 1.52 deaths per 1000 births; 95 % CI, 0.51 toPlanned out - of - hospital birth was associated with a higher rate of perinatal death than was planned in - hospital birth (3.9 vs. 1.8 deaths per 1000 deliveries, P = 0.003; odds ratio after adjustment for maternal characteristics and medical conditions, 2.43; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.37 to 4.30; adjusted risk difference, 1.52 deaths per 1000 births; 95 % CI, 0.51 toplanned in - hospital birth (3.9 vs. 1.8 deaths per 1000 deliveries, P = 0.003; odds ratio after adjustment for maternal characteristics and medical conditions, 2.43; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.37 to 4.30; adjusted risk difference, 1.52 deaths per 1000 births; 95 % CI, 0.51 to 2.54).

Perinatal mortality was higher with planned out - of - hospital birth than with planned in - hospital birth, but the absolute risk of death was low in both settings.

Planned out - of - hospital birth was associated with a higher rate of perinatal death than was planned in - hospital birth (3.9 versus 1.8 deaths per 1,000 deliveries, p = 0.003; OR after adjustment for maternal characteristics and medical conditions, 2.43; 95 % CI: 1.37 to 4.30; adjusted risk difference, 1.52 deaths per 1,000 births; 95 % CI: 0.51 toPlanned out - of - hospital birth was associated with a higher rate of perinatal death than was planned in - hospital birth (3.9 versus 1.8 deaths per 1,000 deliveries, p = 0.003; OR after adjustment for maternal characteristics and medical conditions, 2.43; 95 % CI: 1.37 to 4.30; adjusted risk difference, 1.52 deaths per 1,000 births; 95 % CI: 0.51 toplanned in - hospital birth (3.9 versus 1.8 deaths per 1,000 deliveries, p = 0.003; OR after adjustment for maternal characteristics and medical conditions, 2.43; 95 % CI: 1.37 to 4.30; adjusted risk difference, 1.52 deaths per 1,000 births; 95 % CI: 0.51 to 2.54).

Unless you research it, you are unlikely to learn that a planned homebirth with an experienced midwife is as - safe - as, if not safer, than hospital delivery.

The odds for neonatal seizure were higher and the odds for admission to a NICU lower with planned out - of - hospital births than with planned in - hospital birth.

Initial care, per day, for evaluation and management of normal newborn infant seen in other than hospital or birthing center [not covered for planned deliveries at home]

There would have to be one or more complications of low risk homebirths that result in death in the first week that can be prevented by being in hospital, and death from these complications would have to occur more often than low risk deaths at planned hospital births.

More planned home births had 5 - minute Apgar score less than 4 (0.37 %) compared with hospital births (0.24 %; adjusted OR, 1.87; 95 % CI: 1.36 to 2.58) and neonatal seizure (0.06 % versus 0.02 %, respectively; adjusted OR, 3.08; 95 % CI: 1.44 to 6.58).