Collectively, I bet on far fewer pitcher props
than position player props.
To put it in sports terms, Power Design Inc. recruits athletes rather
than position players.
Not exact matches
Melamed, one of the central
players in the creation and development of the financial futures markets, was CME chairman from 1968 until 1976 and held various leadership
positions at CME for more
than three decades.
In addition, some locations have up to 226 video games, and more
than 300
player positions.
In the early studies on chess
players, novices and experts were shown typical midgame chess board
positions, and when later asked to reproduce them on nearby chess boards, the experts were far more successful
than the novices.
+ wenger out is more
than just lack of spending; its not studying the opposition, not rotating
players, not addressing why we have so much more injuries
than others, not subbing early enough to give incoming
players a chance to influence the game, not playing
players in their best
positions. . . .
The thing with inter they have a lot of
players, Jovetic just came from Sevilla, can play across the top 3
positions, press, shoots and does the hard work, less injury prone
than in his earlier days, will be 28 November and has EPL experience, valued at 12 - 16 million.
seems to reflect the general mess that the club is now in... rent seeking owner disinterested in the game, delusional manager who continues to believe the game is played in his own head rather
than against other teams who are strengthening, too many
players in some
positions too few in others, inflated wage bill due to hanging on to deadwood
players, injury prone before season starts, lack of footballing identity... wexit a necessary but probably not sufficient condition for club to regain its status
Yes there has been problems with Alexis of late and I hope it's not on purpose to force a transfer with one season remaining, he's in a great
position move and contract wise so I'd hate to think a
player of his talents would act anything other
than professional.
The reason they had a
position player pitching is because they haven't had a starting pitcher go more
than five innings since last Thursday.
As regards our defense i won't blame the
players too much for last night result, the manager is to be blamed for not fully prepared and playing
players out of
position, i think if the manager had called the
players in a week earlier
than he did, Mustafi at least would have been fit to play, but the result wasn't that bad as most fans make it seems..
Of note he has started to make space in the midfield by asking Campbell to find a new team, another
player who is far better
than the english core, but will not be given the time to grow, as the likes of Ramsay, Wilshere, Walcott and Chamberlain,, even to the detriment of the team
position in the league, such a tragedy
wenger repeatedly use that word maybe he sick watching some
player do selfish thing like shooting ball himself from long range
than passing to other teammates that already in good
position to score
AW has a way of making
players perform better
than they are namely alex song, nasri, adebayor, overmars etc. and he has a way of making
players better by playing them in other
positions namely monreal, ramsey (before the 13/14 season), özil etc. and i just hate this talk of «he was played in an unfamiliar
position..
Cazorla is far better
than Ozil in my opinion... We wasted 42M to replace our best
player (Cazorla was Arsenal best
player the season before we bought Ozil)... Don't get me wrong, Ozil is good but we should have invest that money on a much needed
position, maybe a striker (Bitty that the stubborn one didnot get Higuain for less
than 30M) or a defender...
More chance of buying luis Suarez
than Wenger adding to a
position with that many
players on the books 6.)
What is interesting to note is that both Leicester and Spuds had no real long term injury casualties to their key
players this season, whereas Arsenal had Cazorla, Coq and Sanchez out for a long period at one time or another... And we should not assume that even if AFC had purchased quality cover for their
positions, we are guaranteed to be better off
than where we are now.
-- consistent injury issue — no signings (when we need them and there are better
players out there
than we have in our team / squad)-- no strength in depth (kids, or not sufficient quality bought)-- no consistency in performance (motivation)-- tactical nativity and inflexibility —
players played out of
position or too Many like minded
players accommodated in same line up.
For anyone to think that they know better
than Wenger (a person that sees these
players in action, practically every day), in what
position a
player should be deployed in, is absolutely ludicrous.
This season he is doing better
than most PL
players in his
position, just more cause to stick him in there.
Look at MC, they had missed a 6 mil
player, Victor Kompany more
than they would have liked and you couldn't really say that they had not tried to find quality cover / starter for this
position given that they had spend 30 million plus on what initially looks like two top centre backs the last two seasons.
Ozil is only very good if you have a better team
than all the teams you are playing against, he needs to be in a team that has top
players in every
position and they all basically have to be very comfortable on the ball.
However, James is much more
than just a single -
position player.
Mahrez is a brilliant
player for sure without a doubt but the OX showed last night that he could be even better
than Mahrez with the OX campbell and walcott do we really need a winger I beg to differ what we need is a striker a striker of 25 + goals imagine henry or van on the team sheet now with the squad we have I liked be yedder because he was young and complete striker a striker that no mater of the circumstances are or
position will strike you a goal pace agility skill clever cunning and ugly
If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these
players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young
players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more
than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays
players out of
position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again
We want Wenger to get us higher
than 4th, but also want him to play
players who aren't performing in their
position.
Before KO, he made us much weaker
than we should have been, because of three elements: using
players that are not good enough at this level,
players in the wrong
position, and
players out of form.
I completely agree that we have much better
players now
than we did that season, and yet we continue to play people out of
position to accommodate Jack and Aaron.
These are professional
players, go watch Ramsay out of
position, rather
than box - to - box; on one goal has was not even looking.
He can also play as a CDM or on the left side of the midfield and is a
player who can play genuinely in more
than one
position.
Fabinho is a good
player, we do lack quality DM and as much as I want to see AMN, we need more
than 1 DM and AMN hasn't been given the chance to dominate the DM
position and make it his own.
We aren't anywhere near City and its easier blaming the ref rather
than ask why
players were in wrong
positions or on the bench.
We have money to compete, there are more
than enough good
players in every
position to buy out there City and Unted cant buy them all.
Other
than Mike Trout (193 OPS +) and Andrelton Simmons (111 OPS +), every single one of their
position players to take an at - bat for them this year is a below - average hitter, according to adjusted OPS.
4) Speed
positions like CB and WR traditionally are places where
players see a rapid rather
than gradual drop off around 30.
Let's face it we can not disagree with Wenger that Ozil is a better play maker
than Ramsey as is Santi IMO, but we can question Wenger for playing
players out of
position.
The
players were flexible in their
positioning and they're roles were recognised across the pitch with a freedom of movement, rather
than being tactically
positioned to play one role and one role only.
Otherwise I think there are better
players than him in the same
position and similar price range.
This is not a case of just staying in the Chiefs normal tendencies against an opponent instead of optimizing a gameplan for that opponent, no, this was actively putting his
players in a much worse
position to be able to do their jobs
than normal.
There is no need to gamble at time of the league, let give Maitland - Niles a chance and i know he will perform well in that
position than other crop of
players for that
position.
More
than any other
player at any
position — even Gurley — Fournette is a must - play.
Which team has a better and bigger crop of 15 attacking
players than alexis ozil cazorla chamberlain Walcott wilshire ramsey campbell giroud welbeck rosicky gnabry akpom zelalem contesting 5
positions
It's notable that Ferguson blames himself, rather
than his
players; he seems to be implying that in circumstances like this, in the knowledge that a manager will be leaving his
position at the end of the season, the intensity can't help but slip away.
«Or maybe it is more basic
than that — Wenger just trying to shoe - horn who he considers the best X1 on to the field by making compromises in
player's natural
positions.».
But more
than that, the Texans, if healthy, have respectable
players at important
positions.
Want to hear from all those arse licking football idiots drooling away on this website over a bunch of friendly victories... So I'll say it again mert is a liability Ramsey and giroud are good bench
players and we need a world class dm... Oh and a new manager... Endlessly playing out of
position... Same shit year in year out with this guy it really is... Even if we win if this guy thinks he has a winning team he is even more dillusional
than I though and I wanted him carried off to funny farm 5 years ago
Don't we have better
players on almost every
position on the field
than chelsea?
Number of guys at
positions at greater need available at 9 sure, number of
players likely to have a better career
than James?
You may be right about bringing another in, not necessarily to first team but an experienced
player coming off the bench is less likely to make silly errors
than a youngster learning what is a very disciplined
position.
Typically an aggressively pressing team will press even a
player that is in a good
position to release the ball, so the tackle will «fail», even though it often forces the opponent to stop what was a potentially promising run, or forces them to pass in a different direction
than they had hoped to go.