They point to new studies that have placed the two popular dog - training methods head - to - head and almost universally shown positive training to be more successful
than punitive methods in reducing aggression and disobedience.
Not exact matches
It's a heck of a lot more motivating
than grabbing your muffin top (if you have one) with disdain and viewing diet as a
punitive method of correcting something you don't love about yourself.
Canine training
methods have evolved tremendously and we now know that
punitive, negative reinforcement training
methods do much more harm to a dog
than good.
Dogs who are raised and trained humanely are more confident and less likely to bite
than dogs who are trained using
punitive methods or equipment designed to intimidate and cause pain.
Positive training has proven to be a much more effective, safer and humane way of teaching dogs
than punitive training
methods and while ultimately every person has the right to choose what techniques they use, the evidence is clear.
For example, in a study which was published in the Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, it was shown that dogs which were trained with only positive reinforcement did far better and displayed fewer behavior problems
than those using
punitive methods (13).
Emily Blackwell's study showed that dogs trained using positive reinforcement were less likely to show aggression and fear
than dogs trained using
punitive methods.
According to Victoria Stilwell — a passionate advocate for positive reinforcement dog training
methods and Editor - in - Chief of Positively.com — «
punitive, dominance - based training techniques... often result in «quick fixes» but ultimately cause more long - term harm
than good while damaging the owner - dog relationship.»
Their disciplinary
methods are supportive, rather
than punitive.