Sentences with phrase «than reading something»

There's nothing more annoying than reading something addressed to you with «Dear Sir / Madam» or «To Whom It May Concern».

Nothing annoys me more than reading something written in legalese for a client.

Nothing can bring more satisfaction than reading something new that sparks the imagination or connecting with other people regarding a topic.

The only thing better than reading something amazing, is sharing it with others.

I'm looking foward to reading Shadow Demons but would rather wait until you feel its ready than read something that's been pushed out just to make a date.

I'd rather wait five years for a memorable book that * connects * with me, than read something that I'll forget in two days.

Not exact matches

When we do something more than six times, our brains start to take the most efficient (read: lazy) path.

A description that reads, «These are really great to give as client gifts,» is less impactful than one that says, «These five gifts, all under $ 30, can be used by a man or a woman and are something every small - business person needs.

It's an especially good feature if you're reading a long article or simply don't want the phone to go to sleep when you're looking at something longer than the screen's default 30 - second time - out period.

Instead, gather way more than you can read at any given time, that way you'll always have something that strikes your fancy to pick up whenever you have a moment to spare.

One example that I read about, Stanford University, a teacher in artificial intelligence offered a class, a couple of hundred kids in the class, he offered it online to 30,000 people, or 20,000 people, and if I remember correctly when he gave the test there were 400 people, or something like that, that did better than the number one kid at Stanford.

So seek out opportunities to feel dwarfed by something much bigger than yourself and your problems, such as gazing at the night sky, hiking through inspiring landscapes, reading up on the mysteries and grandeurs of physics, or even checking out an awe - inspiring YouTube video if you're stuck at your desk.

They are working to design something better than anything we could find in nature: engineered probiotics that will be able to read their environment, detect a problem, and then act.

Included in that plan is an $ 800 - million budget for twinning Port Mann Bridge, potentially giving truck driver Carlos Dias something do to other than talk to his girlfriend and read the paper.

I read all the related articles months ago deciding whether it was something that could work for me, and wasn't convinced — possibly because it seemed more US focused particularly on healthcare benefits (which is not covered by employers here in Oz), but also just couldn't envisage any scenario where my firm would want to let me go (perhaps I think I'm more valuable than I really am??)

It may be because customers have such easy access to more information than ever before — in only a few seconds and with a couple taps on their phones, customers can read reviews, compare prices from multiple retailers, see whether something's in stock, find out how fast it will ship or be available for pick - up, and more.

Something to consider with going after local coverage is that it is easier to land than national or large - scale publications and blogs as they have a smaller pool of stories to pull from and are more likely to read and accept your pitch.

And in fact, the days I feel I've improved the most as an investor are usually the days where I am away from my computer screen deep in thought, reading something useful, or having productive conversations with someone that knows more about a particular business than I do.

I recent read «The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck» by Mark Manson, and I like that he frames happiness as a process — something that is with us as we solve problems — rather than a goal to be attained.

Scripture does do something to us in worship, which is why it is a scandal that Catholic, Orthodox, Anglican and other traditions have more public reading of Scripture in their services than we Bible - oriented evangelical Protestants.

Rather than simply read the article, a scant few inches up the page, a few finger - flicks of a scroll wheel, he demonstrates that he would rather assume and blame a news organization for something that did not occur.

Even so, what is needed for a present - day reading of Kierkegaard is something more important than the crutches professors typically offer to the reader of the works of a genius: an historical introduction that would focus not so much on the circumstances of the inception, but rather on the conditions of the appropriation, of his works.

You really need to read authors other than Dawkins... you might even learn something new!

get a life, get a job, read something other than the bible and educate yourself.

Jesus has revealed Himself to be much more than something I read about.

And below the literal surface of these stories is something bigger than my casual reading first produced for me.

Don't you want them to read something of the bible rather than nothing?

When I was 15, I «gave my life to Christ» — not in a church, but alone, in my room, after months of reading and thinking and looking for purpose and meaning and direction and something bigger than the depressing and lonely life I seemed to be stuck with — and I expected to find those things.

Downplaying water baptism as something that is optional (read: merely a personal decision rather than a command but not a requirement of salvation) is to make our persecuted siblings seem foolish for making such a decision unnecessarily.

Am I reading into it something deeper than you actually meant?

Wright's books have a way of making sense to me later, when I'm doing something other than reading them - like the laundry.

Hawking would have looked smarter if he had indicated he had done some serious and balanced philosophical reading: something more articulate than carping it's all a «fairy tale,» which doesn't tell me anything except he's dismissive and has nothing substantive to say.

For starters, that kind of principle will inevitably mean that those who study the bible beliving in it will think it says something completely different than others who read it.

Neil, you must be reading something other than these posts, comments and responses.

Now, I read some online articles that have discussed this idea, and I understand that people will think scholars are trying to get the Bible to say something different than what it actually says.

Go crawl back under the rock you call home and maybe actually learn to read something worthwhile other than the few books of the gospels while ignoring the rest of the bible.

No less than in the Abraham and Jacob stories, Israel reads in the Joseph story something of her own inner experience of life lived under the rule and covenant of God.

If we step back and forget everything we think we know about church, and read the texts without such filters, they say something very different than often assumed.

I'd much rather read something that is thought - provoking than fluffy posts about sunshine and happiness (though cat pictures are always welcome).

When I read the Bible, I am amazed at how much it describes me: my heart, my sin, my foolishness, my pride, my need for forgiveness, my desire for something better than this messed - up world.

Go read something other than what your pastor tells you to, and get a clue.

I did read what you wrote, but got something different from it than your intended meaning.

Before you go saying that being gay is a crime, you should start stopping people from bringing gay children in to the world Ignorance is bliss... read something other than the buybull for true enlightenment!

Just think if they spent that time reading something other than their book of horror and terror aka the koran??

Please read something other than a religious text if you want to try to sound intelligent.

Show up at a rally, make a friend, email a blogger, listen and read something other than filtered media, with an open heart to learn and honour.

Whenever we read stories of Christ healing, it was on his terms: his was the gift, he chose when to give, and the healing served a purpose to demonstrate something: rather than just for the sake of it.

Rather than spouting off banalities, you might try getting out of basement and reading something other than Mother Jones.

i'm a natural born america atheist that has read and studied somethings other than the bible.

Dr Janet Smith, on the Catholic World Report website, gave what may be something like an authoritative commentary (worth reading at much greater length than I can quote it here) on the particular example the Pope chose, one which caused a considerable raising of eyebrows.