Sentences with phrase «than reason enough»

All, or any one, of these is more than reason enough to begin a productive discussion with a professional marriage counselor, and bring the intimacy back to your intimate relationship.

That should be more than reason enough to get distributor attention, so keep your eyes open.

Not exact matches

The study of more than 1,000 adults found that the top reason for the paltry savings numbers was they simply didn't earn enough to put money away.

And although a Disney - Fox tie - up shouldn't be reason enough for investors to rush into buying stocks, it should show them that there's more to stock success than a rogue Republican senator.

While the trailer for «The Revenant» doesn't say a lot about the plot, it gives more than enough reason to see it.

Combine that influence with the fact that they make up nearly 26 percent of the population and you've got more than enough reasons to start paying attention.

(The reason for growing the organ within a rat rather than a mouse was that the scientists needed to produce enough insulin - producing cells to reverse diabetes» effects in mice.)

Not only is helping people an extremely viable business strategy, it also helps fulfill personal needs and gives you more than enough reasons to burn the midnight oil while working on your company.

When entire sectors ETFs fall greater than 20 %, the skeptic would say that's reason enough to forever keep their money out of the stock market.

Sign - up bonus of $ 500 plus the card is more aesthetically pleasing than any other I've seen - that's enough reason for me!

This rule will see at least one organization taken down by people who join for no other reason than to make a mockery of the organization if only because you've got enough cause heads at any major university to see it happen.

This article implies that you can not believe in atoms and the wonder of evolution without being atheist or non-Christian, which is simply not true (I feel more theistic in a biochem class than I do talking to close - minded «Christian» creationist idiots, interestingly enough for the same reasons the author does).

We will keep repeating it until you realize that there really is no evidence, that your religion has no more validity than any other religion, and that the only reason you believe is that you grew up with it and conformed, or your life bottomed out and you got desperate enough to believe anything, and conformed.

Personally, I've got a better theology of ministry on Good Friday («Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures»), with all sorts of sound sociological, psychological reasons for death and defeat, than I have a pastoral theology robust enough for Easter («He was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures»).

It is tempting simply to show where Luke has got it wrong, but there is more than reason at work and simply winning a rational argument is not enough.

You likely deny evolution and global warming for no other reason than it makes you uncomfortable and hold science to the impossibly high standard of having to explain every conceivable mystery about the natural World before you will accept it, but some moron at a pulpit doing magic hand signals of a Sundaymorning is enough to convince you he is communicating with some sky - god and turning grocery store bread and wine into flesh and blood.

Based on the root post, Boston and Cheddar have more than enough reason to address the obvious troll in deserved fashion.

What you really think is that you've already seen more than enough of that woman and her boring husband, and that even if next Friday weren't the opening game of the NBA championship series you still wouldn't want to be with them — not for any reason, not under any circumstances, not if they were the last people on earth, not in a million years.

That's not the case with same - s3x marriage, which people are trying to be normalized on every front, and this is more than enough reason for Graham to issue a statement about it.

The very fact that, in 2012, a presidential candidate from one party can create instant headlines by arguing against a speech made by a presidential candidate of the other party, more than 50 years ago, should be enough to convince any fair - minded American that we still have much work to do as we try to reason with each other about these questions.

In our age people want to hear nothing about this, generally they want to know no more about irony than Hegel has said about it — who strangely enough had not much understanding of it, and bore a grudge against it, which our age has good reason not to give up, for it had better beware of irony.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

You likely deny global warming for no other reason than it makes you uncomfortable and hold science to the impossibly high standard of having to explain every conceivable mystery about the natural World before you will accept it, but some moron rolling around a floor speaking in tongues is enough to convince you he is channeling a spirit.

For we have more than enough reason to wonder whether a Bible shorn of its divine authority can continue to serve as a useful support for any moral message whatsoever.

With growth in Catholic colleges and universities that take their faith seriously, and with schools like Aquinas College forming a generation of teachers, there are more than enough reasons for hope.

Part of the reason I am not a calorie counter is that I have spent enough time looking at nutritional labels to have a pretty good estimate in my head and can then place the foods I make on a mental list of sorts...» super healthy», «better than a cookie» or «once a year for a holiday».

Welbeck should go as well, earning more than 100k per week should be reason enough to put the economy department in an asylum.

However, there is more than enough reason for United to believe they can flourish in this year's competition.

Holliday's face got more of the ground than his hand did of the plate, and for some reason, that was enough for the home plate ump.

but for some strange reason wenger never seems to build a big enough squad, to compete in all competitions it almost as if he is only interested in certain cups more than others.

He was never great at it, this is a stupid reason to keep someone around for more than ten years, esp when all the evidence is saying that he is not good enough.

Having said that all our play hinged on Coq, and the fact that Wenger has been so pig headed when it came to Schneiderlin, when the guy clearly wanted to come to Arsenal and we have more than enough funds, makes me angry, as it is a huge risk and extremely likely that Coq will not be able to play all games this season for whatever reason.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I can't stand welbeck for one reason he's not better than what we have but if you played a front two of welbeck and Sanchez then Cambpell left and Walcott or chaimbo right that would give us a huge counter attacking style with lots of skill and pace, but here is the problem to do this you need big strong DM to win the ball back when we defend and we do t have them, flaming is reckless and getting old, Arteta is good on the Bala but not quick or strong enough, please don't say Diaby as we all know he will be inj soon again, then also what to do with Ozil and Corzola?

hope you are right on giroud but walcott lacks the brains and ability to be anything other than average at best... and the fact that wengers misplaced faith in the man is probably one of the reasons we never went for griezman after the last world cup is grounds enough for wanting to see the back of him asap

Are you really naive enough to believe that Wenger would bring anyone into this current locker room that is going to be given a strong voice... have you not been watching, listening or reading about our club for years... Lehman is a blind Wenger follower, which is the only reason he was even considered... just for a second think of all the strong personalities that have played for this club that have never been seriously considered even though they have expressed legitimate interest in participating in the coaching process... even worse, think of all the former greats who aren't even allowed on the same pitch as Wenger because they have offered their advice and / or criticism to the infallible one... I dare you to find a manager that has distanced himself from his former players as much as this man... it's the very reason why only one player I can think of has ever returned to play for Wenger and that was Flamini, which was hilarious considering we were desperately looking for a top quality defensive midfielder but Wenger could somehow find no one better than Flamini in the whole wide world... let's face it this club was simply trying to appease it's disgruntled fans by declaring that Wenger would no longer be given Ca rte Blanche when it came to the backroom staff so they probably asked him to give them a list of those who he would allow in the locker room... on that list he wrote Lehman, Pires and Bergkamp, likely because the first two are the only former players who haven't publicly questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't get in an airplane

At SB Nation, it's me, for no other reason than I started doing it years ago and wasn't smart enough to stop.

No matter how you slice it, you can't run an uptempo offence with Giroud on the pitch and that means sideways soccer and an over-reliance on crosses into the box, thereby negating many of the very reasons Lacazette was on your radar in the first place... we simply aren't clinical enough from wide positions to continue with that approach, which is why many fans have been clamoring for a viable alternative to Giroud for several years... once again this isn't an attack on Giroud, he clearly has some tangible skills, but his mere presence on the pitch greatly impacts your tactical options... Giroud's weaknesses are simply highlighted by the way in which our offence now moves in a more horizontal than vertical manner, which allows most teams ample time to regroup defensively before a scoring opportunity even arises... a player of Ibra's or Benzema's ilk would have been far more effective as they had size, speed and the first touch capabilities required to for intricate link - up play... once again square peg in a round hole

I'm generally not a full round mock kind of guy (I don't know enough about all the other 31 teams), but I've taken more interest in this draft than ones from years past for some reason.

This and the fact that we HAVE actually tried him as a DM more than one occasion, and it didn't work out well, is reason enough not to chance it.

There's a reason why we created so many chances against Stoke, «Theo,» though he was not ruthless enough to put more than one away, Giroud is no better at that either.

I am a Arsenal fan have been for some time longer than Wenger has been Manager, do not get me wrong but I want Arsenal to lose the final, reasons being that hopefully Will be the only time Wenger would wałk Wenger has to go enough is enough if Arsenal win Wenger and the board will say that there is no problem with the setup here at Arsénal nothing needs to change Wengers got it all in hand for next season Blah Blah Blah ect groundhog day all over again.

«For whatever reason, we weren't good enough and we'll have to play a lot better than that if we're going to kick on and improve.»

The recent woeful results, especially the humiliating 10 - 2 aggregate defeat to Bayern Munich in the Champions League should have been more than enough reason for the French man to step down but that doesn't appear to be the situation right now.

As it turned out, my baby was born 10 weeks early and I had to pump ever few hours with almost no supply... for FIVE weeks, the only reason we made it through was because of online friends and their pushiness: — RRB - Weirdly enough, when I did meet with the lactation consultant in the NICU, I knew more than HER about some of the tricks!

Note that your caregiver will schedule your surgery for no earlier than 39 weeks — unless there is a medical reason to do so — in order to make sure the baby is mature enough to be born healthy.

That worked fine enough, but I still had the same problem — when we would go to the bathroom someplace other than our house, they would balk (except for my youngest for some reason).

Research shows that less than 5 % of all women do not produce enough breast milk to feed their own babies, so if more women were given the support they need, there would be no reason for them to purchase breast milk from an unknown, and potentially dangerous, source.

For this reason, as many parents know, there are more than enough baby products that claim to be the best at helping make your life as a new parent much easier.

That gives you more than enough reasons for a child to be overweight, without even having to look at things like trans fats or high fructose corn syrup.