Sentences with phrase «than scientists originally»

«Despite being vilified for decades, dietary cholesterol is understood to be far less detrimental to health than scientists originally thought.

This process is far shorter than scientists originally thought, he said.

Viruses have many more tricks for invading cells and replicating themselves than scientists originally imagined.

Not exact matches

These scientist, and doctors, can not remake skin, bone, eyes, brains, oval eggs, sperm, none of the sort, so they have no real answer to create a life other than how procreation works, where again what, and how is the very first man, or woman, animal, other creatures, either in the sea, or creeping on this earth was originally created from, as where did they first come from?

Deforestation is likely to warm the climate even more than originally thought, scientists warn.

«Our very first estimates are for rings less massive than we originally thought, which would indeed point to a very young age,» says Linda Spilker, Cassini's project scientist at JPL.

«Risk of psychosis from cannabis use lower than originally thought, say scientists.»

Japan's claim that these whales were originally much rarer than now is almost certainly not true, Palumbi told New Scientist, and «there is no evidence whatsoever that their population growth is inhibiting populations of other whales in Antarctica».

If astronomers find Voorwerp is emitting light it once absorbed from a quasar, «this would be some kind of pointer to the possibility that there is more local black hole growth than we might have estimated originally», Urry told New Scientist.

Thus, this discovery means that the emergence of this feline on the Iberian Peninsula actually dates back 500,000 years earlier than what scientists originally thought.

But scientists now say this elusive zone where conditions are not too hot and not too cold for life to exist is far bigger than originally thought.

My stance is pretty much that of the scientists researching climate and what is found in the IPCC report (except changes are happening quicker than originally reported).

Scientists at the Advanced LIGO facility in Washington have once again detected gravitational waves, marking the third time in 18 months that the facility has observed ripples in the fabric of space - time that were originally predicted by Albert Einstein more than 100 years ago.

Scientists using the Atacama Large Millimeter / submillimeter Array (ALMA) have discovered that planets orbiting the star Fomalhaut must be much smaller than originally thought.

Although I don't remember what ever happened to that kit, I DO remember that playing scientist and making an attractive custom scent was a lot harder than I originally thought it would be!

Once Calhoun and a group of other roughnecks and scientists get to the facility, they discover that the sharks are indeed smarter and more furious than they originally bargained for... and pregnant!

According to new information, scientists now believe ancient humans had a stronger bond than originally thought with their canine companions, even caring for them while sick and elevating them to burial status.

If, for example, scientists had somehow underestimated the climate change between Medieval times and the Little Ice Age, or other natural climate changes, without corresponding errors in the estimated size of the causes of the changes, that would suggest stronger amplifying feedbacks and larger future warming from rising greenhouse gases than originally estimated.

Just as a hypothetical example: If climate scientist will tell me that recent pause in global warming is due to the effect of an inactive sun (which is the reality as reported by following) http://www.spaceweather.com and that they will go back and improve their models to account for this, then I would be more inclined to believe their other claims... Instead the IPCC doubles down on their predictions and claim the future effects will be worst than they originally thought?

New research by a team of international scientists reveals that the effects of human induced climate change began much earlier than originally thought.

My stance is pretty much that of the scientists researching climate and what is found in the IPCC report (except changes are happening quicker than originally reported).

Folland's erroneous adjustment had been originally criticized at CA in 2005 here and further discussed at length in March 2007 at CA here, a post in which I observed that no climate scientist had made any attempt to validate Folland's bizarre adjustment and that correcting Folland's error (through a more gradual and later changeover to engine inlets than the worldwide overnight change that Folland had postulated after Pearl Harbour) would have the effect of increasing SST in the 1950s, in turn, potentially eliminating or substantially mitigating the downturn in the 1950s that was problematic for modelers.