So take the time to make sure that your resume can effectively compete as winning resumes can help you more
than score job interviews but also advance your career exponentially.
Not exact matches
Today's workers are pretty entitled when it comes to Olympics - watching during the workday: More
than three - quarters say it's «appropriate» for them to take work time to watch a competition or check
scores — and a surprising 56 % think it's just fine for them or their colleagues to spend half an hour of the workday watching, listening to, or reading about the games, and almost 10 % think it's reasonable to spend an hour or more concentrating on the Games instead of their
jobs.
The findings show that 58 percent of online daters say a good credit
score in a potential partner is more attractive
than driving a nice car, 50 percent say good credit is more important
than an impressive
job title and 40 percent said they favor good credit over physical fitness.
Conversely, employees who say they would change
jobs to have privacy
score lower
than the average employee on all engagement elements, particularly the element «At work, I have the opportunity to do what I do best every day.»
Many students have lower
scores than those who have graduated and have stable income from a full - time
job, so there is a good chance that you can qualify for a better rate.
Only a fair defense (the Russian attack wasn't much, so you can not give the Americans much credit for Russia's low
score, either), the rebounding of rugged Bob Hodges and the defensive
job Henry McDonald did on Kruminsh, kept the game from being more of a rout
than it was.
Seems to trust his teammates more
than before and has done a better
job picking his
scoring spots which helps his shooting percentage, but still understands when it is time to take over.
The people arguing against you believe this is a balanced team that the defense should only be asked to keep the opponent's
score low allowing the high powered offense to do its
job any more
than that would be a bonus.
Sanchez wasn't happy at getting substituted because he just
scored a goal and probably wanted to
score more, its now Wenger's
job to make him understand why the changes was made and he have to live with it as he's not bigger
than the club.
Why are we more mad at the guy who did a better
job of creating a goal
scoring opportunity
than all the other misses from the team this season that have resulted from countless lazy, careless shots and poor positioning that had no chance at all?
If we really want new dm
than Shneiderlin is perfect, he knows EPL, knows system and he is briliant defensivly, look at Coq he isnt
scoring or assisting, his main
job is to took ball, and thx to God he can do that crazily good, in distance future Coq will get injury and who will replace his skills, Shneiderlin is good call, plus we will have Arteta in special situations!!!
While Giroud has his
scoring boots on we should take advantage of this time to give Alexis a rest, I think OX n Theo are more
than capable of doing the
job on the wings.
Giroud plays for ARSENAL with all the midfield maestro's providing, assisting, creating chances and making his
job way easier but still can not
score more
than they have.
They started the season as the comeback kings, but since christmas their defence has been solid and our low
scoring attack will have to do a better
job than in the last few rounds.
Our weak point in our team right now is our right wing (nothing agaisnt campell, just that recently we have created nothing there unless is bellerin doing runs) and our box to box, yesterday ramsey was no near to existence in the midfield, he was more concerned to
score than to do what he should f * qin do that is connect the midfield with the attack, heck alexis did a better
job doing that... Elneny did it alright vs burnley but I want to see him againsta PL side, and i reckon he can do a better
job that ramsey has done in the last few matches
End of the day, if we
score more
than we concede,
job is done for that day.
He's a CM, his
job IMO is something totally different
than scoring.
@ saveA, mate those people are so deluded, that what happen when you trust blindly in Wenger.Giroud is an average player with no talent whatsoever, he can
score, that is
job but he should not be near any big team.He plays for Arsenal because he is french and a Wenger favourite.He plays for the french national team because any player playing for a big team is thought as good over there and anyway their team is rather crap and are not nearest
than the england team (with the same problem) to win anything.
Many Arsenal fans have questioned why the French international can't manage to stay on for the whole 90 minutes of games and maybe
score more as our opponents get tired legs, but Arsene Wenger is adamant that he will continue his policy of taking him off in the later stages of games.Le Prof told Arsenal.com: «First of all I would like to say that in my
job you sub strikers more
than defenders, because they have to create, they have to provoke, they have to be incisive in every run.
we are so obsessed with statistics that we ignore the things our players do purely on the field... 2004 year of invincibles nobody gave a f*ck bout statistics other
than possession, corners, fouls and shots taken as long as we were winning... Nwakwo Kanu wasnt a worker yet he was among the best... even adebayor nobody cares bout his heat map or how many times he ran up the pitch as long as he was doing his
job which is
scoring snd now suddenly we are intreseted in how many times a player stood on the pitch, how many times he did nt run and other shits..
He
scored 5 more goals
than Lukaku in the league last season and while he may not be world class, he does a great
job in our current system.
However, Welbeck has been brought in to do a
job of not only
scoring goals, but to render better utility as a striker
than the Girouds and Sanogos, who neither fall into the category of strikers or target men.
look man i understand that you say ozil in the middle means no protection or less
than adequate but ozil will be CAM and he is close to
scoring a tap - in rather
than giving shield to arteta who is an unreliable source and does not deserve the captaincy, wenger only gave it to him cause he gave the players some papering over the cracks statements after the Liverpool, chelsea and man city match and the player does not even have a cap for the national team Wenger may have seen this as a player who can play in and out with no internationals regardless of his qualities on the pitch and the main reason why he sold vermaelen who would have done decent
job at CDM and then all that fluid style that arsene thinks he can play dictate «arrogance»!
In spite of that, Kyle Turris seemed to have
scored less
than four minutes into the game after his linemates did a great
job creating space, but despite his best efforts he was offside on the play and the goal didn't stand.
I cant understand some fans how can you say a player like villa cud not do a
job at arsenal he is a world class finisher something we do nt hav at the moment as much as henry is a god at the emirates lets face it last yr he cudnt give us no more
than 15 mins a game the pace had left him plus he iz now 35 david villa to me regardless his age is one of the most prolific strikers out there like tola said look at raul villa is that type of player theu might lose pace but neva lose the knack of
scoring goals wenger bring him in and another thing barca as a big club shud be ashame of themselves still owing arsenal money of those transfers for such a big club arsenal shud be going in for more players
than jus david villa
There could be a case to argue if incorrect refereeing decisions kept going against you (as they did with West Ham last season) that you have been the victim of misfortune; but if it is simply your players not being able to do there
job effectively (e.g. by converting goal -
scoring opportunities) then this is a reflection of ability or coaching rather
than luck.
More
than four in ten Americans 42 percent — approve of Trump's
job performance, which is the highest
job approval rating he has seen since he took office and an increase from the 38 percent
score he received in Marist's survey conducted Feb. 20 - 21.
Ed Miliband's ratings are also unchanged this month, with just over a third (36 %) satisfied with the way he is doing his
job as leader of the Labour party and two in five (43 %) dissatisfied, his net
score of minus 7 being better
than Cameron's or Clegg's.
Cuomo's
job approval rating is 63 - 28, which is higher
than the current
scores of any governor in all nine of the states where Quinnipiac polls.
In the FT, George Parker says the former prime minister provides «some
score - settling, more self - criticism
than one might expect, and a sense of deep frustration that his long wait to become prime minister ended with him struggling to cope with the
job and seeing his economic legacy come crashing down».
Miliband's ratings remain far worse — only 20 % think he is doing a «good
job», with 55 % saying the opposite — a net
score of — 35, considerably worse
than his always - negative average over the past few years.
If we had an 85 percent graduation rate and we were inching up toward 90 percent, if we didn't have the worst SAT
scores among 50 upstate school districts, if we didn't have a Syracuse Teachers Union survey — the results of which revealed that 300 teachers reported being assaulted on the
job and more
than half feel threatened on the
job, and 21 percent of their new teachers teaching from zero to five years leave in addition to more seasoned veteran teachers — we wouldn't need such bold decisive action, but we're not in that category.
From bold yet feminine suits to chic skirt - and - sweater combo, it's easier
than you'd expect to put together an outfit that will help you
score the
job.
The site features the standard promotional bumf, but does a good
job of showing off the film's lavish technical credits, particularly Consolata Boyle's costumes and Alexandre Desplat's lovely
score, which is actually more delicate
than the selected excerpt here suggests.
Penned by Max Landis and directed by Josh Trank, while «reinvention» would be too strong a word, «Chronicle» does a nice
job of twisting the standard genre tropes into a pleasantly refreshing, highly entertaining story that features no costumes, no villains, no
score, and even at less
than 90 minutes, a fair amount of substance.
«Mr. Elfman's Musical Concoctions» (7:13) interviews composer Danny Elfman, who gives us more thought
than usual into his
score, as he recalls the themes he created and the order that they took shape in an «effortless», energizing
job he came to off of seven consecutive assignments and somehow finished two weeks early.
Anderson does a remarkable
job of covering up the fact that his story lacks real substance, using tricks such as a constantly moving camera and an increasingly - intrusive
score to make things feel a lot more tense
than they actually are.
Focusing on the start of the teacher pipeline, i.e., on those who report applying for a teaching
job or teachers who begin classroom positions in the year immediately after receiving an undergraduate degree, we find that teacher applicants and new teachers in recent years have significantly higher SAT
scores than their counterparts in the mid-1990s.
Put another way: individuals with high SAT
scores from earlier cohorts were less likely to pursue a teaching position
than their lower -
scoring counterparts, but for the 2008 cohort, high - and low -
scoring individuals were about equally likely to pursue a teaching
job.
«Minimally effective» teachers whose
scores were closest to the «effective» threshold were less likely to leave
than those with lower
scores; about one in four teachers whose
scores were within 25 points of the «effective» threshold chose to leave their
jobs, compared to about one in three whose
scores were more
than 25 points below.
Duckworth attributes the difference to perseverance rather
than talent: There wasn't any significant difference in teacher effectiveness based on the SAT
scores and college GPAs of the
job applicants, she calculated.
Clearly, such a model does a better
job of measuring school «effectiveness»
than a model that simply provides a snapshot of the percentage of students
scoring above a given benchmark.
When judging school quality, the public gives much more weight to students»
job preparation and interpersonal development
than to their standardized test
scores, the poll shows.
Demographic - adjusted average test
scores also do a worse
job at identifying schools where students learn the least, with the average growth rates of bottom - 15 % schools based on this metric closer to that of the average
score measure
than the growth - based measure.
This is not surprising; we may presume that high -
scoring teachers had access to better
jobs than low scorers.
The emerging sense from the analysis of the principal interviews is that low -
scoring principals care more about doing their
job than impacting lives.
First — test
scores fell under Covington and weeks before he took the
job in Michigan the state confirmed that test
scores were lower and that we met FEWER benchmarks towards accreditation
than when he started.
Thirdly, a teacher's
job is so much more
than a student's
score on an exam and we all need to stop acting like that's the case.
Secondly, if two teachers are in an urban classrooms that are side by side and one gets 4 new students who are not proficient in English and their test
score drops by 3 percent, are they doing a better or worse
job than the teacher who gets 2 new special education students and 1 new English Language Learner, but their test
score goes up 2 percent after the special education students are given the alternative test rather
than the standard mastery test.
And yet, the researchers argue that using test
scores to make high - stakes decisions about teachers»
jobs is actually a more accurate method
than previous systems, which often depended on cursory classroom observations, pass rates on licensure tests, and degrees earned.