I read the kindle edition, which is cheaper
than the paper book.
With a kindle, for example, the experiential learning process is qualitatively inferior
than a paper book.
Most comments agreed with my thoughts: Ebooks should be less expensive
than paper books because -LSB-...]
In his annual program session on current ereaders, Keith Fahlgren of Threepress Consulting noted that while «the first Kindle didn't really offer that much more
than a paper book,» there is much more to come in the form of networks of ereaders.
So the real question is, are e-readers more environmentally friendly
than paper books?
But in general I personally think that $ 5.27 is a perfectly reasonable price for an ebook, and I think most readers EXPECT that an ebook, with no distribution costs or retail middle - man to pay, should be less
than a paper book.
I don't give a rat's behind what books are and aren't offered in Kindle format, because I don't have any plans to start reading anything other
than paper books for the foreseeable future.
And Lori, here's my issue with e-books: Publishers can come up with all sorts of reasons why they charge what they do, but if people perceive an e-book as worth less
than a paper book — and people do, for very valid reasons — then they won't be willing to pay as much.
Well as for how big the market is — I don't have any hard and fast numbers for you but Amazon sold more ebooks
than paper books this year, and Smashwords (an ebook distributor) publishes over 70,000 ebooks and counting.
Macmillan wants e-books to be sold differently
than paper books using essentially a consignment model (please correct me if my analogy is flawed).
I don't have the space and its easier carrying an ereader around
than a paper book.
In a recent study done by the CleanTech Groupfindings show that the Amazon Kindle is more eco friendly
than paper books.
The book contents are changed into electronic versions, and are sold online at a price much lower
than paper books, even some of them are free of charge.
If an e-book is the same price or higher
than the paper book, it's pure price gauging by the publisher.
Primarily, it's less expensive to publish and distribute e-books
than paper books.
the woman is a fool, yes the should be cheaper
than paper books, but no where near pennies, authors do have to eat!
They also cheaper
than paper books.
eBooks are much cheaper
than paper books and if the real price difference was reflected in list prices people would not be willing to pay the premium for paper books.
Look, little boys and girls — Ebooks are now much more expensive
than paper books.
eReaders and eBooks are going to continue to grow because they are much more convenient
than paper books.
E-books are cheaper
than paper books and indie e-books are much cheaper than traditionally published books.
The problem is — there is no scarcity, readers have all the power, ebooks cost less to make and sell
than paper books and everyone knows it, there is infinite competition, readers aren't stupid.
[158] While an e-reader costs more than most individual books, e-books may have a lower cost
than paper books.
It is as good as paper and better
than some paper books that have text that is a bit light.
If paper books are so expensive due to printing, ink, distribution etc etc then ebooks should be less expensive
than paper books, not more.
So in practice, I wrestle with purchasing an ebook at the same or higher price
than the paper book (which I will get to actually own).
Also the way we consume, share, and interact with e-books is going to be different
than paper books.
Amazon now sells more copies of e-books
than paper books.
In a recent study done by the CleanTech Group findings show that the Amazon Kindle is more eco friendly
than paper books.
While it may sound impressive to say more e-books
than paper books were sold on Christmas Day, I have to wonder about this claim.
What do you think of this study and its claim that eBook Readers (the Kindle in particular) is more eco friendly
than paper books?
Claims that the Amazon Kindle electronic reader is more environmentally friendly
than paper books hold up, according to an analysis by the Cleantech Group.
Amazon ebooks give you less freedom
than paper books (see http://stallman.org/articles/ebooks.pdf).
The Continuing Legal Education of the State Bar of Texas is making an effort to make all CLE materials available as PDF files rather
than paper books or loose - leaf binders, which I applaud.
Not exact matches
The 2015
paper, published in the journal PNAS, suggests that Facebook «likes» can reveal more about people
than just interest and music, movie,
book, and sports preferences.
I further urge all of the other quasi-analysts that look to silver as «nothing more
than a byproduct» of giant copper, zinc, and lead mining operations might want to consider whether the notional value of the
paper «hedges» carried on the
books of the bullion banks might not represent the ultimate discounting mechanism.
Now take your
book which is no more
than toilet
paper in my eyes and STFU.
the abundance of purely uneducated Muslim believers, their oppressive existence in their self created repressive regimes, lifestyles, and governments, their radical inturpitations of their fairy tale
book, the fact that their culture and people have contributed less to man kind
than any other culture and people of all the earth, their self ritious belief system that empowers them to commit atrocious crimes against humanity, the muslim men prance around in flip flops and linen moo moo's while they lock their woman in their household prisons to be abused slave - wife's, are entirely too ignorant to even build sewer systems and even after thousands of years that other cultures have developed running water toilets, toilet
paper, and effective sewerage systems, they still whipe their pood - cracks with one hand (no
paper) and eat with the other, and yiddle to the sky just before detonation of their suicide bombs that murder innocent men, woman, children, and babies.
Back then the prophets like Ezekiel wrote on scroll
paper that was wrapped around sticks, rather
than using
book form like the Bible is in today.
I would think God, and / or, Allah, cares a little bit more about human life
than words on some
paper from a
book.
Nobody is obligated to act according to another's religion, and that includes acting as if some
book is «sacred», or is anything more
than paper and ink.
A computer no more remembers the files stored in it
than the
paper and print of this
book remember my argument to this point.»
... yeah suzy and others... I just happen to realize that when monkey devolving didn't quite work out on
paper it all changed to single cells and from the slime off of the worlds garbage can and so on... I just happen to know more
than you think... In another ten or twenty years the science
books will all have a new teaching... the Bible has been around and hasn't changed one word in over two thousnad years..
You are not any better
than believers, you withdraw your conclusion right of
papers, Not much different
than the ones who read the bible or any other
books.
More
than 10,000 titles include
books on architecture, astronomy, chess, clip art and fine art, crafts, history, literature, and mathematics, as well as music scores, the world's premier paper doll line, value - priced Dover Little Activity Books, and titles by over two dozen Nobel Laure
books on architecture, astronomy, chess, clip art and fine art, crafts, history, literature, and mathematics, as well as music scores, the world's premier
paper doll line, value - priced Dover Little Activity
Books, and titles by over two dozen Nobel Laure
Books, and titles by over two dozen Nobel Laureates.
We found that board
books are the best in the stroller because their pages don't turn on their own in the wind, are a little more weather resistant
than plain
paper books, and are easy for little fingers to manipulate without any help.
Board
books are slightly different
than regular
paper books because they are harder to destroy, making them the perfect accompaniment for your child as they age into toddlerhood.
Within the first months of 1896, physicians were blasting cancer with X-rays, and before the year was out more
than 1,000
papers and scores of
books had been published on the many uses of «roentgen rays.»
He was a brilliant physicist who published more
than 230 scientific articles,
papers,
books,
book chapters and children's
books.
The
book also urges researchers not to publish the same work in more
than one journal or to slice it into several
papers to increase their publication count, because doing so is an improper use of reviewers and editors» time and dilutes the value of the scientific literature.