Not exact matches
Politicians tell a lot of stories in their campaign speeches, and there's a not - so - secret
reason why: if you convey your message through a dynamic story or metaphor, it has a better chance of resonating with your audience
than if you were to simply state the facts.
But it makes people more cynical
than they already are» cynical about
politicians, and cynical about newspapers» and cynicism corrodes the cynical, even when they have
reason to be, and for that the Washington Post bears responsibility.
and Romans — well Romans is automatically disqualified for me because it was written by that self - proclaimed «apostle» Paul (the
politician — whose words are the most dangerous and untrustworthy of the NT — we have no
reason to believe his words any more
than those of Joseph Smith).
If such talk of truth makes my neighbor, the rabbi, uncomfortable — and I can understand how it might — I can only point out that Jesus is my sole
reason for defending the rabbi against the onslaughts of either fascist
politicians or liberal theologians who will not embrace him until he becomes «rational» or «enlightened» in other words, something less
than Jewish.
There is now no
reason, other
than childish point scoring (as
politicians constantly do) to fight fellow Gooners.
You have models in the case of road transport where the algorithms may be proprietary and not available, but they are being made to determine government policy nevertheless, because it is convenient for
politicians to say, «The
reasons we are building these roads is because the computer said so», rather
than — «I decided that we would have more roads because I want to see more roads.»
The media - savvy police commissioner about town was at the top of this last year and with good
reason: Mr. Bratton is many ways a better
politician than the mayor who hired him.
«I can't think of another
politician in this country who has engaged in more flip - flopping for political
reasons than Sadiq Khan.
She added: «I actually think that the British public are more sensible
than that, and they're going to realise that this is an individual
politician who has had a
reason to resign.
His
reason: «Let the activists, let the people decide» who the nominee will be, rather
than the
politicians.
But one
reason that has not happened is because too many
politicians — and not only in Washington — would rather play the issue for cheap and immediate political gain
than do the tough work we need to fix a broken system to make it easier for honest people of talent and ability.
Politicians don't necessarily know any more
than anyone else about «the big issues», and this is certainly not a valid
reason to renege on a referendum promise.
After all, there are still 36 % of Kiwi respondents who find
politicians alluring, citing such
reasons as `' Good value debate, good conversationalist» and `' they are usually driven, confident and more often
than not financially stable.»
If some teachers could earn improvements in their wages and working conditions from their own efforts rather
than from the efforts of their organized representatives or affiliated
politicians, then more - effective teachers would have little
reason to support the unions financially or politically.
Politicians find «economists» to suit their political ends, and they come up with complex
reasoning for why measured inflation is higher
than it should be, inequality is rising, etc..
Action brought against such people is fully justified, they are employed by Governments who need to face the wroth of those who are being ignored and set aside to pander to companies and self serving
politicians who have no other
reason to do what they do
than to worm their ideological claptrap to empower themselves at the expense of others they believe are nothing more
than acceptable collateral damage, to achieve their personal desires.
I see no
reason that
politicians will automatically make better decisions
than free people.