Sentences with phrase «than the arguments of»

The most disingenuous aspect of creationism is that is alleges evidentiary problems with evolution (generally, nothing more than arguments of incredulity based in arguments of ignorance), but then invariably requires invocation of magic to patch up their «legitimate alternative.»

«Calculations» about whether or not to kill an innocent person become no more than arguments of advocacy based on hypothetical scenarios of the future.

The neutral facilitator helps the parents focus on what is most important to them (the children) rather than the arguments of the past.

To help the spouses look to the future and focus on what is most important (for example, the children) rather than the arguments of the past, a neutral facilitator with a mental health licensure is oftentimes brought in.

A neutral facilitator, who generally is licensed in a field of mental health, oftentimes helps the spouses focus on what is most important (such as the welfare of the children) rather than the arguments of the past.

In the most common collaborative divorce model that we use in Tampa Bay, a neutral facilitator, who generally has a mental health background, is retained to help the clients focus on the future and the issues (such as parenting) that are most important to them rather than the arguments of the past.

And the facilitator will work with you and your spouse to focus on the future rather than the arguments of the past.

A specially - trained facilitator is generally utilized to help the parties focus on what is most important to them (e.g., their children) rather than the arguments of the past.

A facilitator, who generally has a mental health license, is oftentimes utilized to ensure that the parties focus on what is most important to them (such as their children) rather than the arguments of the past, and a neutral financial professional is oftentimes used to cut costs on financial disclosure and ensure the parties have a personally - tailored financial solution.

A facilitator, who generally has a licensure in therapeutic services, is usually engaged to help the spouses reduce costs to focus on the what is most important to them (i.e., their children or their financial futures) rather than the arguments of the past.

Collaborative divorce often takes advantage of experts to focus on the future and the children rather than the arguments of the past, and helps parties develop budgets and financial scenarios to ease the transition from married to single life.

To help the spouses look to the future and focus on what is most important (for example, the children) rather than the arguments of the past, a neutral facilitator with a mental health licensure is oftentimes brought in.

The facilitator helps you and your spouse focus on your future rather than the arguments of the past.

Attorneys are solution - oriented rather than attack dogs, focus is placed on the future rather than the arguments of the past.

Parties utilize the expertise of outside experts, such as communication facilitators and financial professionals, as needed to ensure transparency and that the parties are focused on the future, rather than arguments of the past.

A neutral facilitator, who generally has a license in therapeutic services, is usually engaged to help the spouses reduce costs to focus on the what is most important to them (i.e., their children or their financial futures) rather than the arguments of the past.

Neutral professionals are oftentimes brought in to help the spouses communicate effectively and focus on the future rather than the arguments of the past.

Oftentimes, a neutral facilitator with a license in counseling or therapy is retained to help the spouses focus on what is most important to them (such as the health and well - being of their children) rather than the arguments of the past.

A neutral facilitator (who is often a trained mediator, psychologist, or other licensed mental health professional) is brought on board to ensure that discussions focus on the future of the family unit rather than the arguments of the past.

A neutral facilitator, who generally is licensed in a field of mental health, oftentimes helps the spouses focus on what is most important (such as the welfare of the children) rather than the arguments of the past.

The spouses agree to be open, honest, and transparent, and to focus on the future rather than the arguments of the past.

A specially - trained facilitator is generally utilized to help the parties focus on what is most important to them (e.g., their children) rather than the arguments of the past.

Not exact matches

While there's an argument to be made that AI is over-hyped as a technology, there's data to back up Sanwal's tongue - in - cheek advice: Mergers and acquisitions of AI startups increased by a factor of seven between 2011 and 2015, from five to more than 35 deals, according to the research firm.

But I've yet to see a really robust version of that argument, let alone an explanation of why firing makes more sense, ethically, that this punishment alone is the right one, ethically, than all those other outcomes, or — for those who believe this is true — why he deserves everything on the menu.

The essence of Chamorro - Premuzic's argument is that, a few very technical situations aside (and if you're involved in those, insufficient IQ probably isn't a major concern of yours), more real - world problems get solved with people skills than raw intelligence.

Now, you may or may not find that to be a persuasive argument about the state of income inequality in Canada — as our own Chris MacDonald has pointed out, determining the fairness of CEO pay is more complicated than it seems.

Once you understand what the market is paying, you need to build an argument for why you offer create more value for the business than they expect in an entry - level hire, said behavioral scientist Matt Wallaert, co-founder of fair - pay site GetRaised.

«Feel free to push the argument at the security line that a keyboard, portable battery or any other piece of electronics bigger than a smartphone (whichever size smartphone they decide upon) is considered a risk,» says Chris Roberts, a Chief Security Architect at security firm Acalvio.

But a closer examination of the argument reveals a mindset that seeks to punish women rather than create positive change.

«Any argument they make for keeping that in would result in the same kinds of legal challenges presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries been deemed more dangerous than others?»»

I wrote my thesis on the philosophy of history with the central argument that Industrial Civilization would collapse and either be replaced by a new emergent socio - economic revolution an order of magnitude higher than industrialization and agriculture combined, or we would go back to the stone age or extinct.

The episode made me far more famous among people who advocate the design argument than anything I could have without the participation of the atheists.

But that dynamic is likely on account of growth - minded economic policy in those countries rather than a specifically detrimental economic policy in the U.S.. Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have not made this argument.

As behavioral psychologist Susan Weinschenk explained on her blog recently (via a great personal story, of course), by putting us in their protagonists» shoes, stories manage to engage more of the brain than straight recitations of facts or dry arguments, leading to more arousal and interest.

That Monday's accident was the first fatal incident involving a fully autonomous vehicle indicates that arguments for their safety have merit, but much of that testing has occurred on highways, which are easier for self - driving cars to navigate than dense, urban environments.

On Hacker News, Y Combinator's message board, the post has more than 690 comments, many of them supportive of Altman's argument.

Redford did not make that argument, perhaps because she thought that 75,000 jobs still sounds better than a marginal decrease in the price of gasoline.

And even some of the Snap bulls admit that their arguments are often based less on logic or fundamentals than on wishful ideas of a faraway day when Snap will be profitable.

«Elliott has always behaved ethically in its disputes with corporate managements and boards, and it is regrettable and disappointing that certain parties adverse to us would choose to promote false allegations about us rather than engage on the merits of our arguments in good faith.»

She reiterated Trump's argument that the NFL protests, which began more than a year ago when 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick sat during the anthem in protest of police brutality, «disparage [s] the brave men and women in uniform» and American values more broadly.

Sanwal said he was surprised to find that most of the content being produced in his industry lacked any quantitative analysis; what he saw were primarily opinion pieces by experts trying to sell their arguments based on their industry reputations rather than any real data.

The judge declared that this was an argument of the «privileged» and said that Ulbricht was no different than a drug dealer from the Bronx.

GE calls the sharing concept the GE Store, and it's one of the company's main arguments for why its parts are more valuable together than separated.

The heart of this argument is simple arithmetic: Consumers and citizens, despite the labels, are the same creatures, and no less divided when they go to the mall than they are online or at the polls.

Anyway, if you work in one of the few organizations that haven't yet been bitten by this egregiously awful management fad, here are 16 solid arguments why private offices, working from home, and even cubicles are better for business than these glorified hotel lobbies.

With national security driving the debate, Democrats see a more powerful argument than simply advocating the need to curb gun violence in a country of 320 million that has more than 310 million weapons.

«In my experience people who assert statements like that are often immune to evidence or rational argument, and envision themselves as superior beings who are more enlightened than the rest of us.»

Its argument now is that breaking up EMC would provide shareholders more return — that the piece parts are worth more separately than they are as part of a semi-unified whole.

In fact, one of the arguments used by TransCanada to gain American support for the $ 7 - billion Keystone pipeline is the more than 250,000 jobs the project will create for the U.S. economy.

Compare a 4 % drop to the fact that unemployment grew across the country from around 4 % to almost 10 % in the same timeframe and you could make the argument that broker employment has actually held up better than that of most professions.