Not exact matches
The pellet will
immediately implode, reaching a temperature of more
than 100 million degrees at a pressure 100 billion times that of Earth's
atmosphere.
CO2 concentrations would start to fall
immediately since the ocean and terrestrial biosphere would continue to absorb more carbon
than they release as long as the CO2 level in the
atmosphere is higher
than pre-industrial levels (approximately).
The promising
atmosphere is perpetuated by an engrossing early sequence in which the central foursome debate the fates of three seemingly innocent bystanders, and yet it's equally clear that the movie begins to peter out almost
immediately following that electrifying interlude - as writer / director Berg's less -
than - cinematic visual choices result in a lack of thrills that grows more and more problematic as time progresses.
It's not
immediately obvious that a warmer
atmosphere behaves differently
than a cooler one.
Rather
than heating the entire
atmosphere evenly, our waste heat heats the
atmosphere immediately surrounding the points of consumption.
«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will warm the Earth's surface and
atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature under this condition will rise more
than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to
immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.
3) That energy can only get from the ocean to the
atmosphere (and then to space) when the skin layer is cooler
than the water
immediately below.
The warming effect from anything other
than increased pressure or higher solar input will be
immediately offset by the expansion of the
atmosphere reducing molecular density at the surface.
«CO2 concentrations would start to fall
immediately since the ocean and terrestrial biosphere would continue to absorb more carbon
than they release as long as the CO2 level in the
atmosphere is higher
than pre-industrial levels (approximately).
However, burning trees releases carbon into the
atmosphere immediately — more per unit of electricity generated
than coal — and any new trees planted won't reach maturity and absorb the same amount of carbon for decades, if ever.