The spot is 10 °C (50 °F) warmer
than the atmosphere near it.
Not exact matches
Conditions are otherwise favorable for intensification through Sunday, with a moist
atmosphere, light wind shear less
than 10 knots, and very warm ocean waters
near 30 °C (86 °F).
In the First Epistle of Peter the reader is aware of an
atmosphere which seems in some respects
nearer to that of the primitive Church, as we divine it behind the early chapters of Acts,
than anything else in the New Testament.
At night, when more VLF signals can pass through the Earth's
atmosphere, a French satellite called DEMETER measured more electrons
near the inner belt when a powerful transmitter in Australia was turned on
than when it was off.
Microclimate is the climate
near the ground which can be colder or warmer
than in the free
atmosphere, depending on local topography (e.g. north vs. south side of a hill, higher vs. lower elevation) and vegetation (e.g. young sparse vs. old dense forest).
HAARP,
near Gakona, Alaska, comprises radio transmitters and antennas that are used to heat up the ionosphere — the uppermost region of the
atmosphere — creating a laboratory in the sky for scientists.The facility has been used to produce an artificial aurora and to study how charged particles behave in the ionosphere, at a total cost of more
than $ 250 million to build and operate.
Co-author Dr Grant Wilson, from Energy2050 at the University of Sheffield, said: «Having a longer - term view, it is likely to prove vastly cheaper not to emit a tonne of CO2 into the
atmosphere over the
near - term, rather
than to have to take it back out of the
atmosphere after 2050.
On that same day, a 19 - meter - wide space rock plowed through the
atmosphere and exploded over southwestern Russia
near Chelyabinsk, shattering windows and causing more
than 1,600 injuries.
As the sun flushes heat into our
atmosphere at a mind - boggling rate of 175 quadrillion watts, the air
near the equator absorbs more energy
than the air
near the poles.
Looking at shows that the spatial resolution afforded by the TMT in the
near infrared (~ 1 - 5 µm) is more
than adequate to resolve the 11 km scale height of the Martian
atmosphere.
Interestingly, the extremely bright storm seen by the 10 - meter Keck II telescope in the
near infrared is not the one seen by the amateurs, which is much deeper in the
atmosphere than the one that initially caused all the excitement.
For example, 2005 is
near solar minimum in the 11 year cycle, and radiance now is about 1 - 2 W / m ^ 2 less
than a few years ago, which means Pluto and Mars are getting LESS solar radiance on the time scale of the
atmosphere and polar cap changes, EVEN IF the radiance averaged over the whole cycle was higher.
Natural variability is primarily controlled by exchange of heat between the ocean and the
atmosphere, but it is an extremely complex process and if we want to develop better
near - term predictive skills — which is looking not at what's going to happen in the next three months but what's going to happen between the next year and 10 years or 20 years or so — if we want to expand our understanding there, we have to understand natural variability better
than we do today.
While larger planets could have sufficient gravity to attract a massive hydrogen - helium
atmosphere, smaller planets — like Mars or Mercury that have less
than half the Earth's mass — located in or
near their star's habitable zone may lose their initial life - supporting
atmosphere because of low gravity and / or the lack of plate tectonics needed to recycle heat - retaining carbon dioxide gas back into the
atmosphere (Kasting et al, 1993).
This orbits places the planet
near the inner edge of its host star's habitable zone, where liquid water could exist in liquid form under favorable conditions such as an albedo of 0.52 with an orbital eccentricity of 0.11 and more
than 52 percent cloud cover under a sufficiently dense
atmosphere of water, carbon dioxide, and molecular nitrogen like Earth's (ESO science release; Pepe et al, 2011; and Kaltenegger et al, 2011 — more below).
For all its
atmosphere, Weathering does begin to meander aimlessly, suggesting it might be better at
nearer 200 pages
than 300.
Stalos is situated
near the popular beach resorts of Malia and Hersonissos, and offers a selection of golden sandy beaches and a more relaxed
atmosphere than its neighbouring resorts.
Argentea offers a family
atmosphere that is created through the introduction of parkland
near the residential precinct; there will be more
than 50 acres of green space and wildlife corridors throughout Argentea Palm Cove.
It's a game that wants you to embrace a more realistic
atmosphere, but allows players to park a tank in a bush, creating an invisible predator that's
near - impossible to detect; and of course it's a game that rewards patience, but includes a short - cut just in case you're looking to get a little bit of an edge sooner
than later.
In none of your model scenarios involving realistic
near - term Carbon releases (1000 gigatonnes or less, based on the consideration that the 1990 - 1999 release is estimated in IPCC TAR to be 6.3 gigatonnes per year) does more
than 20 % of the injected CO2 remain in the
atmosphere for 1000 years.
There may be far more carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere over the entire prior century
than in previous ones — but that hasn't translated into anywhere
near temp.
Likewise a perturbation to the T ^ 4 pattern that gradually decays downward into the
atmosphere may be necessary to balance the anomolous cooling
near TOA and some anomalous warming below that due to the darkness of space (the anomalous warming would be from the intensity in all directions downward from space not only being not more
than 0 but also being not less
than 0 — continuation of the T ^ 4 pattern would after all require negative values at some point).
Although this is an over simplified model, I believe it is closer to the truth
than the current idea that a change in the height of layer of
atmosphere near the tropopause, around 100 mb, can affect the temperature of the planet at the 1000 mb level.
Moreover, the seasonal, regional, and atmospheric patterns of rising temperatures — greater warming in winters
than summers, greater warming at high latitudes
than near the equator, and a cooling in the stratosphere while the lower
atmosphere is warmer — jibe with what computer models predict should happen with greenhouse heating.
At a given level in the
atmosphere, any low that is generally characterized by colder air
near its center
than around its periphery; the opposite of a warm low.
In addition, a combined analysis of the response at the surface and through the depth of the
atmosphere using HadCM3 and the solar reconstruction of Lean et al. (1995) concluded that the
near - surface temperature response to solar forcing over 1960 to 1999 is much smaller
than the response to greenhouse gases (Jones et al., 2003).
CO2 concentrations: — Are slightly higher
near the ground
than for instance 10 km up in the
atmosphere, in the size 10 ppm.
By measuring changes in winds, rather
than relying upon problematic temperature measurements, Robert J. Allen and Steven C. Sherwood of the Department of Geology and Geophysics at Yale estimated the atmospheric temperatures
near 10 km in the Tropics rose about 0.65 degrees Celsius per decade since 1970 — probably the fastest warming rate anywhere in Earth's
atmosphere.
This is because over the past three years, hundreds of new scientific field accounts of global warming's impacts, as well as improved peer - reviewed analyses of global warming itself in both the deep past and the very
near future, have depicted earth's
atmosphere as far more «sensitive» to the invisible CO2, methane and other human - sourced greenhouse gases
than had been hoped.
By measuring changes in winds, rather
than relying upon problematic temperature measurements, researchers estimated the atmospheric temperatures
near 10 km in the Tropics rose about 0.65 degrees Celsius per decade since 1970 — probably the fastest warming rate anywhere in Earth's
atmosphere.
So would this hypothetical
atmosphere be isothermal, or much
nearer to isothermal
than our real
atmosphere?
So the partial trapping of solar energy
near the Earth's surface by clouds and greenhouse gases does cause the
atmosphere to fill a volume greater
than it otherwise would at that temperature.
The United States is not only responsible for the current crisis because, as President Obama noted, it is the second highest emitter of ghg in the world behind China, it has historically emitted much more ghgs into the
atmosphere than any other country including China, it is currently
near the top of all nations in per capita ghg emissions, and the US has been responsible more
than any other developed nation for the failure of the international community to adopt meaningful ghg emissions reduction targets from the beginning of international climate negotiations in 1990 until the Obama administration.
Satellite radiometric soundings have also been used to provide temperature readings in layers in the
atmosphere from
near the surface up to about 25 km (16 miles) or so, although these measurements offer less vertical and spatial resolution
than in situ measurements.
And Mars drier
than anyplace on earth - it's a dry, very cold airless desert - and that in it's wetter and warmer areas:) Venus has such a huge
atmosphere that it holds about as much water vapor in it's
atmosphere that it has somewhere
near as much a earth does in it's
atmosphere.
It is my view that the
atmosphere will always find a way to lose energy to deep space by some means at or
near its top, and will thus always have a troposphere lapse rate which implies that the planetary body will always be warmer with an
atmosphere (regardless of gas mix)
than it would be without one.
This sounds wild, but really no wilder
than warming by a gas (CO2) that makes up a
near trivial portion of the
atmosphere.
There is a
near infinite supply of greenhouse gases available to the
atmosphere in the form of water vapor from the ocean to provide the greenhouse effect, but the relative humidity in the
atmosphere is much less
than one.
The world's climate is way too complex... with way too many significant global and regional variables (e.g., solar, volcanic and geologic activity, variations in the strength and path of the jet stream and major ocean currents, the seasons created by the tilt of the earth, and the concentration of water vapor in the
atmosphere, which by the way is many times more effective at holding heat
near the surface of the earth
than is carbon dioxide, a non-toxic, trace gas that all plant life must have to survive, and that produce the oxygen that WE need to survive) to consider for any so - called climate model to generate a reliable and reproducible predictive model.
It is lucky that it is denser
than air, if not then all the methane generated
near the surface of the terrasphere would whisk its way off into the
atmosphere.
Ridley: «The failure of the
atmosphere to warm anywhere
near as rapidly as predicted was a big reason: there has been less
than half a degree of global warming in four decades - and it has slowed down, not speeded up.»
As Lubos points out, the
atmosphere is hotter
near the ground
than in the high
atmosphere.
We have been adding more CO2 to the
atmosphere than the rate at which it increased in the
atmosphere by a factor
near two.
Further, there is little doubt (except from Bart and Salby and a few others) that humans are the cause of the CO2 increase in the
atmosphere, as humans emitted twice the total amount of CO2 in the
atmosphere than observed, which is in
near exact ratio to the human emissions:
Any additional heat in the
atmosphere, therefore, will tend to radiate out into space (an infinite heat - sink) or into the oceans (which, being 1000 times denser
than the
atmosphere and having an enormous volume, are a
near - infinite heat - sink).
-- The δ13C level of all CO2 from volcanoes of the world and from the oceans is higher
than of the
atmosphere, all CO2 measurements in the
atmosphere and the ocean surface give a steady decline in δ13C in
near perfect ratio to human emissions.
If the gas gets removed from the
atmosphere in less time
than that, it will tend to be found in higher concentrations
near its source and its concentration will be variable with place and time.
Upper
atmosphere water vapor is important because as reported in a previous guest post https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/06/nasa-satellite-data-shows-a-decline-in-water-vapor/ «A water vapor change in the 300 - 200 mb layer has 81 times the effect on OLR
than the same change in the 1013 - 850 mb
near - surface layer.»
Regarding heat flow between the ocean and
atmosphere, keep in mind that hte average surface temperature of the global oceans is about 17C, which is warmer
than the
near - surface
atmosphere (on average).
Fortunately, at least for a part of the day, CO2 levels
near the surface over land are average a lot higher
than in the bulk of the
atmosphere.